Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 421

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid random forest with GeoDetector and RFE for factor optimization

Open access
Zhou, Xinzhi, Wen, Haijia, Zhang, Yalan, Xu, Jiahui, Zhang, Wengang·2021·Geoscience Frontiers

Abstract

The present study aims to develop two hybrid models to optimize the factors and enhance the predictive ability of the landslide susceptibility models. For this, a landslide inventory map was created with 406 historical landslides and 2030 non-landslide points, which was randomly divided into two datasets for model training (70%) and model testing (30%). 22 factors were initially selected to establish a landslide factor database. We applied the GeoDetector and recursive feature elimination method (RFE) to address factor optimization to reduce information redundancy and collinearity in the data. Thereafter, the frequency ratio method, multicollinearity test, and interactive detector were used to analyze and evaluate the optimized factors. Subsequently, the random forest (RF) model was used to create a landslide susceptibility map with original and optimized factors. The resultant hybrid models GeoDetector-RF and RFE-RF were evaluated and compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy. The accuracy of the two hybrid models (0.868 for GeoDetector-RF and 0.869 for RFE-RF) were higher than that of the RF model (0.860), indicating that the hybrid models with factor optimization have high reliability and predictability. Both RFE-RF GeoDetector-RF had higher AUC values, respectively 0.863 and 0.860, than RF (0.853). These results confirm the ability of factor optimization methods to improve the performance of landslide susceptibility models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101211

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 421

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, X., Wen, H., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., & Zhang, W.
Venue
Geoscience Frontiers
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
101211
ISSN
1674-9871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159603761
Cited by
421
References
2
FWCI
66.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.