The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Public green space inequality in small towns in South Africa
Abstract
Abstract The distribution of public green space within towns is frequently uneven, and influenced by attributes such as its location relative to the commercial core, as well as the ethnicity and relative wealth and education of the residents. Yet most studies are from large cities in developed countries. In contrast, this study reports on the distribution of public green space across 9 small towns in a developing country, namely South Africa, which offers a unique case study because of its former racially defined settlement patterns. We do so using GIS analysis of aerial photographs focusing on 3 types of suburbs in each town, defined on the basis of wealth as well as race-based history under the previous apartheid regime. The more affluent suburbs, inhabited mainly by whites, have the lowest density of housing and the highest area of green space per capita. Proportionally, they have a similar area under public green space as to the previously racially defined townships, but because of the lower housing density, they have a greater area per person. The newly built low-cost housing areas (termed RDP suburbs), occupied largely by poor black South Africans, are poorly endowed with public green space, and fare worse than the other 2 suburb types on all attributes measured. This needs to be addressed in further low-cost housing developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nesbitt, L., Meitner, M. J., Girling, C., Sheppard, S. R. J., & Lu, Y. (2019) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.007 · Cited by 612
Rigolon, A., Browning, M., & Jennings, V. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.026 · Cited by 444
Exploring relationships between socioeconomic background and urban greenery in Portland, OR
Nesbitt, L., & Meitner, M. (2016) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f7080162 · Cited by 53
Socio-spatial legibility, discipline, and gentrification through favela upgrading in Rio de Janeiro
Comelli, T., Anguelovski, I., & Chu, E. (2018) · City · doi:10.1080/13604813.2018.1549205 · Cited by 26
Billions of people exposed to increasing heat but decreasing greenness from 2000 to 2022
Ye, T., Xu, R., Huang, W., Yang, Z., Yu, P., Yu, W., Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Wen, B., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100870 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthew McConnachie, M., & Shackleton, C. M.
- Venue
- Habitat International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244-248
- ISSN
- 0197-3975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983133270
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public green space inequality in small towns in South Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.09.009
- The paper
- Matthew McConnachie, M., & Shackleton, C. M. (2010). Public green space inequality in small towns in South Africa. Habitat International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.09.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.