Cited by 122Medication Adherence and ComplianceTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Effect of late medication non-compliance on outcome after heart transplantation: A 5-year follow-up

Dobbels, Fabienne, De Geest, Sabina, van Cleemput, Johan, Droogne, Walter, Vanhaecke, Johan·2004·The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

Abstract

Background Although non-compliance with immunosuppression therapy is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation (HTX), evidence for this association is limited to 1 prospective study that assessed medication non-compliance in the early post-HTX period and used self-report. The current prospective HTX cohort study explores the predictive value of late non-compliance (>1 year after HTX) during a 5-year follow-up using the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) for compliance assessment. Methods We categorized 101 patients (86% men; aged 55 +/- 10 years; time after HTX at inclusion, 1,253 +/- 534 days) as medication non-compliers (n = 17) or compliers (n = 84) based on the MEMS. Late acute rejections, transplant coronary artery disease (TxCAD), retransplantation, and death were registered during the 5-year follow-up. Results Non-compliers had significantly more TxCAD (p = 0.025). Non-compliers also had a greater rate of late acute rejection (11.8% vs 2.4%) and retransplantation (13.3% vs 2.5%)), although these differences were not statistically significant. Mortality rates were similar. Kaplan Meier analysis showed that non-compliers had a significantly shorter clinical-event-free time compared with compliers (mean, 1,318 vs 1,612 days; p = 0.043). Cox regression analysis showed that the adjusted relative risk associated with non-compliance was 2.03 (p = 0.0582), after controlling for other known transplant-related risk factors for poor clinical outcome. Conclusion The current study demonstrates that medication non-compliance in the late post-transplant period doubles the risk for an untoward clinical event. Non-compliance is a continuous risk factor after heart transplantation that should be targeted by compliance-enhancing interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.healun.2003.09.016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dobbels, F., De Geest, S., van Cleemput, J., Droogne, W., & Vanhaecke, J.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Venue
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
1245-1251
ISSN
1053-2498 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098046549
Cited by
122
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Keywords
heart transplantation, medication non-adherence, immunosuppression, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, late acute rejection, retransplantation, mortality, medication event monitoring system, clinical outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Rejection, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Heart Transplantation, Treatment Refusal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review