Effect of late medication non-compliance on outcome after heart transplantation: A 5-year follow-up
Abstract
Background Although non-compliance with immunosuppression therapy is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation (HTX), evidence for this association is limited to 1 prospective study that assessed medication non-compliance in the early post-HTX period and used self-report. The current prospective HTX cohort study explores the predictive value of late non-compliance (>1 year after HTX) during a 5-year follow-up using the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) for compliance assessment. Methods We categorized 101 patients (86% men; aged 55 +/- 10 years; time after HTX at inclusion, 1,253 +/- 534 days) as medication non-compliers (n = 17) or compliers (n = 84) based on the MEMS. Late acute rejections, transplant coronary artery disease (TxCAD), retransplantation, and death were registered during the 5-year follow-up. Results Non-compliers had significantly more TxCAD (p = 0.025). Non-compliers also had a greater rate of late acute rejection (11.8% vs 2.4%) and retransplantation (13.3% vs 2.5%)), although these differences were not statistically significant. Mortality rates were similar. Kaplan Meier analysis showed that non-compliers had a significantly shorter clinical-event-free time compared with compliers (mean, 1,318 vs 1,612 days; p = 0.043). Cox regression analysis showed that the adjusted relative risk associated with non-compliance was 2.03 (p = 0.0582), after controlling for other known transplant-related risk factors for poor clinical outcome. Conclusion The current study demonstrates that medication non-compliance in the late post-transplant period doubles the risk for an untoward clinical event. Non-compliance is a continuous risk factor after heart transplantation that should be targeted by compliance-enhancing interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For heart transplant patients, non-adherence assessed by MEMS was associated with unfavorable outcomes.
“For heart transplant patients, non-adherence assessed by MEMS was associated with unfavorable outcomes[21].”
From Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Patient Adherence and Medical Treatment Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
Robin DiMatteo, M., Giordani, P. J., Lepper, H. S., & Croghan, T. W. (2002) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200209000-00009 · Cited by 1,490 · see citing works
Weight, Weight Change, and Coronary Heart Disease in Women: Risk Within the 'Normal' Weight Range
Willett, W. C. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520300035033 · Cited by 924 · see citing works
Farmer, K. C. (1999) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0149-2918(99)80026-5 · Cited by 889 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rasmussen, J. N., Chong, A., & Alter, D. A. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.2.177 · Cited by 975 · see citing works
Kavey, R.-E. W., Allada, V., Daniels, S. R., Hayman, L. L., McCrindle, B. W., Newburger, J. W., Parekh, R. S., & Steinberger, J. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.179568 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
Dobbels, F., Vanhaecke, J., Dupont, L., Nevens, F., Verleden, G., Pirenne, J., & De Geest, S. (2009) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e3181a440ae · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationThe challenges of using medication event monitoring technology with pediatric transplant patients
Shellmer, D. A., & Zelikovsky, N. (2007) · Pediatric Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3046.2007.00681.x · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Intensifying Therapy for Hypertension Despite Suboptimal Adherence
Rose, A. J., Berlowitz, D. R., Manze, M., Orner, M. B., & Kressin, N. R. (2009) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.133389 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation
Bertram, A., Fuge, J., Suhling, H., Tudorache, I., Haverich, A., Welte, T., & Gottlieb, J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226167 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“For heart transplant patients, non-adherence assessed by MEMS was associated with unfavorable outcomes[21].”
Background
- Authors
- Dobbels, F., De Geest, S., van Cleemput, J., Droogne, W., & Vanhaecke, J.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- ORCID
- Dobbels, Fabienne
- Venue
- The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1245-1251
- ISSN
- 1053-2498 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098046549
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Keywords
- heart transplantation, medication non-adherence, immunosuppression, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, late acute rejection, retransplantation, mortality, medication event monitoring system, clinical outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Rejection, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Heart Transplantation, Treatment Refusal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review