The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss
Open accessAbstract
The classic view of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is that the “primary” targets are hair cells, and that cochlear-nerve loss is “secondary” to hair cell degeneration. Our recent work in mouse and guinea pig has challenged that view. In noise-induced hearing loss, exposures causing only reversible threshold shifts (and no hair cell loss) nevertheless cause permanent loss of >50% of cochlear-nerve / hair-cell synapses. Similarly, in age-related hearing loss, degeneration of cochlear synapses precedes both hair cell loss and threshold elevation. This primary neural degeneration has remained hidden for three reasons: 1) the spiral ganglion cells, the cochlear neural elements commonly assessed in studies of SNHL, survive for years despite loss of synaptic connection with hair cells, 2) the synaptic terminals of cochlear nerve fibers are unmyelinated and difficult to see in the light microscope, and 3) the degeneration is selective for cochlear-nerve fibers with high thresholds. Although not required for threshold detection in quiet (e.g. threshold audiometry or auditory brainstem response threshold), these high-threshold fibers are critical for hearing in noisy environments. Our research suggests that 1) primary neural degeneration is an important contributor to the perceptual handicap in SNHL, and 2) in cases where the hair cells survive, neurotrophin therapies can elicit neurite outgrowth from spiral ganglion neurons and re-establishment of their peripheral synapses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RIBEYE, a Component of Synaptic Ribbons
Schmitz, F., Königstorfer, A., & Südhof, T. C. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00159-8 · Cited by 581
Cited by
Maladaptive plasticity in tinnitus — triggers, mechanisms and treatment
Shore, S. E., Roberts, L. E., & Langguth, B. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.12 · Cited by 474
Therapeutic approaches to the treatment of tinnitus
Langguth, B., Elgoyhen, A. B., & Cederroth, C. R. (2019) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021556 · Cited by 129
Efferent inhibition of the cochlea
Fuchs, P. A., & Lauer, A. M. (2019) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a033530 · Cited by 79
Ma, K., Wang, F., Song, X., Yang, H., Gao, X., Zhu, Y., Fu, B., She, X., & Cui, B. (2026) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.70368 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C.
- Venue
- Hearing Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 330
- Issue
- Pt B
- Pages
- 191-199
- ISSN
- 0378-5955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113747279
- Cited by
- 754
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.009
- The paper
- Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2015). Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.