The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) improve the growth and nutrient use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.) under water deficit conditions
Open accessAbstract
Drought is one of the major abiotic stresses that affects crop yield worldwide. An eco-friendly tool that can broadly improve plants' tolerance to water stress is bioionocula comprising plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). In this study, the effect of two PGPR Cupriavidus necator 1C2 (B1) and Pseudomonas fluorescens S3X (B2), singly and/or co-inoculated at two inocula sizes (S1 - 3 × 10 3 cells g −1 dry weight (dw) soil and S2 - 3 × 10 6 cells g −1 dw soil), on growth, nutrient uptake, and use efficiency was assessed in maize ( Zea mays L.) plants grown at three levels of irrigation (80% of water holding capacity (WHC) – well-watered, 60% of WHC - moderate water deficit stress, and 40% of WHC - severe water deficit stress) in a greenhouse experiment. The impact of water deficit and bioinoculants on soil microbial activity (fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis) was also evaluated. Moderate and severe water deficit negatively affected soil microbial activity, as well as, maize growth, by reducing plants' shoot biomass and increasing root/shoot ratio at 60 and 40% of WHC. Bioinoculants mitigated the negative effects on shoot biomass, especially when PGPR were co-inoculated, increasing up to 89% the aerial biomass of plants exposed to moderate water deficit. Bioinoculation also increased nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) use efficiency, which may have led to higher maize growth under water deficit conditions. The size of the inocula applied had marginal influence on biometric and nutrient parameters, although the higher concentration of the mixture of PGPR was the most effective in improving shoot biomass under moderate water deficit. This study shows that rhizobacterial strains are able to increase nutrient use efficiency and to alleviate water stress effects in crops with high water demands and have potential applications to keep up with productivity in water stress scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview
Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. (2013) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6 · Cited by 2,028 · cited 1×
“Drought hinders the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments often leading to a reduction in the plant's photosynthetic rates (Ashraf and Harris, 2013).”
Background
Cited by
Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: Limitations and opportunities
O'Callaghan, M., Ballard, R. A., & Wright, D. (2022) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12811 · Cited by 489
Physiological and molecular insight of microbial biostimulants for sustainable agriculture
Kaushal, P., Ali, N., Saini, S., Pati, P. K., & Pati, A. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1041413 · Cited by 104
Sarkar, D., Sankar, A., Devika, O. S., Singh, S., Shikha, Parihar, M., Rakshit, A., Sayyed, R. Z., Gafur, A., Ansari, M. J., et al. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-95092-6 · Cited by 99
Costa, S. D. A. D., Cardoso, A. F., Castro, G. L. S. D., Júnior, D. D. D. S., Silva, T. C. D., & Silva, G. B. D. (2022) · Applied and Environmental Soil Science · doi:10.1155/2022/3228594 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira, S. I. A., Abreu, D., Moreira, H., Vega, A., & Castro, P. M. L.
- Venue
- Heliyon
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e05106
- ISSN
- 2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3091996442
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) improve the growth and nutrient use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.) under water deficit conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05106
- The paper
- Pereira, S. I. A., Abreu, D., Moreira, H., Vega, A., & Castro, P. M. L. (2020). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) improve the growth and nutrient use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.) under water deficit conditions. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.