CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106Technostress in Professional Settingsscientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analyzing the evolution of technostress: A science mapping approach

Open access
Salazar-Concha, Cristian, Ficapal-Cusí, Pilar, Boada-Grau, Joan, Camacho, Luis J.·2021·Heliyon
DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06726PMC PMC8065288
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper analyzes the scientific map of technostress and the scientific production on this topic between 1982 and 2017, highlighting its structure, evolution, and trends in this field. A literature review based on bibliometric analysis of 246 records indexed in Scopus database was conducted. These publications were analyzed according to bibliometric indicators and through science maps with SciMAT. Co-occurrence of terms by grouping techniques was implemented. In addition, elaboration of maps of science and performance analysis for periods was executed. The main contribution of this work is to provide the first scientific map of technostress and a detailed understanding of the scientific production that predicts the directions of future research. The bibliometric analyses permit an overview of the growth, extent and distribution of the scientific literature related to the technostress and the study of the scientific production of an institution, country, author or research group.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06726

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The strategic diagram. Source (Cobo et al., 2011b):
Figure 1 The strategic diagram. Source (Cobo et al., 2011b):CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Published items and appointments for each year.
Figure 2 Published items and appointments for each year.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Accumulated graph of publications and citations.
Figure 3 Accumulated graph of publications and citations.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Citations average value per published document per year.
Figure 4 Citations average value per published document per year.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Accumulated citations by types of scientific work.
Figure 5 Accumulated citations by types of scientific work.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Publication citation evolution in period 1982–2003.
Figure 6 Publication citation evolution in period 1982–2003.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Publication citation evolution in period 2004–2011.
Figure 7 Publication citation evolution in period 2004–2011.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 8 Publication citation evolution in period 2012–2014.
Figure 8 Publication citation evolution in period 2012–2014.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 9 Publication citation evolution in period 2015–2017.
Figure 9 Publication citation evolution in period 2015–2017.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 10 Therm overlapping map in the scientific production of technostress, indexed in Scopus the period 1982–2017. Data were retrieved on August 17, 2018 and processed in SciMat V. 1.1.04.
Figure 10 Therm overlapping map in the scientific production of technostress, indexed in Scopus the period 1982–2017. Data were retrieved on August 17, 2018 and processed in SciMat V. 1.1.04.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 11 Strategic diagram of the scientific production on technostress, indexed in Scopus, for periods 1982–2003, 2004–2011, 2012–2014 and 2015–2017 (The quadrants correspond to Figure 1).
Figure 11 Strategic diagram of the scientific production on technostress, indexed in Scopus, for periods 1982–2003, 2004–2011, 2012–2014 and 2015–2017 (The quadrants correspond to Figure 1).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 12 Thematic evolution for periods of study.
Figure 12 Thematic evolution for periods of study.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 13 Thematic network associated to the topic technostress.
Figure 13 Thematic network associated to the topic technostress.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brillhart, 2004, Technostress in the workplace: managing stress in the electronic workplace, J. Am. Acad. Bus., 5, 302
  2. Goodman, 2007, Update on Scopus and web of science, Charlest. Advis., 8, 15
  3. Martínez, 2018, What is happening in social work according the web of science?, Cuad. Trab. Soc., 30, 125

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–106 of 106

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Salazar-Concha, C., Ficapal-Cusí, P., Boada-Grau, J., & Camacho, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Austral University of Chile (CL)
  • Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Salazar-Concha, Cristian
ORCID
Venue
Heliyon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
e06726
ISSN
2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06726
PMC
PMC8065288
OpenAlex
W3156819183
Cited by
106
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 3
FWCI
16.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rovira & Virgili repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • The Oberta in Open Access (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Universidad Austral de Chile
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
technostress, science mapping, research trends, research output, research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review