Cited by 3,379Management Theory and PracticeMining and Industrial ProcessesGeomechanics and Mining Engineering

Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting: An Examination of the Psychological Situation and Defences of a Work Group in Relation to the Social Structure and Technological Content of the Work System

Trist, E. L., Bamforth, K. W.·1951·Human Relations

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001872675100400101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W.
Venue
Human Relations
Published
1951-02
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
3-38
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-282X
OpenAlex
W2119748171
Cited by
3,379
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 682 · 2025: 253 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 89
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Mining and Industrial Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Geomechanics and Mining Engineering
Keywords
longwall mining, coal mining, social consequences, psychological impact, miners, occupational stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review