Physicians’ attitudes and knowledge toward artificial intelligence in medicine: Benefits and drawbacks
Open accessAbstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field is increasing and is expected to shape future clinical practice and job security. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the opinions and attitudes of practicing physicians in Bahrain regarding the benefits and drawbacks of AI for their future daily practice. A cross-sectional survey of practicing physicians with a minimum of five years' experience across the main secondary and tertiary care hospitals in Bahrain was conducted. An online questionnaire was used to collect data on demographics, knowledge of AI, attitudes towards the use of AI in 10 tasks of daily clinical practice, and opinions on the benefits and drawbacks of AI. A total of 114 physicians participated in the survey. Among them, 43 (37.7%) were registered psychiatrists, 15 (13.2%) were pathologists, 17 (14.9%) were radiologists, and 39 (34.2%) were surgical specialists. The participants' attitudes were overall positive towards AI. Pathologists were particularly in favor of using AI to "Formulate personalized medication and/or treatment plans for patients" and to "Interview patients in a range of settings to obtain medical history." Most participants agreed that AI would reduce the time needed to establish a diagnosis and negatively affect employment rates. There were no correlations between the responses and the participants' age, gender, years of experience, or AI knowledge. This study demonstrates that the attitudes towards the use of AI in medicine among practicing physicians in Bahrain are similar to those of physicians in developed countries in that they are positive and welcoming of AI implementation in practice. However, the potential effects of AI on job security are a major concern.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Al-Medfa et al. (2023) found that concerns regarding job security exist.
“concerns regarding job security exist.”
From Impacts of generative artificial intelligence on the future of labor market: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Al-Medfa et al. (2023)
Al-Medfa et al. (2023) reported that doctors have a largely positive attitude towards the use of AI in their daily work, particularly those with multiple specialties.
“Al-Medfa et al. (2023) reported that doctors, particularly those with multiple specialties, have a positive attitude towards the use of AI in their daily work.”
From Impacts of generative artificial intelligence on the future of labor market: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Al-Medfa et al. (2023)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Al-Medfa, M. K., Al-Ansari, A. M. S., Darwish, A. H., Qreeballa, T. A., & Jahrami, H.
- Affiliations
- Arabian Gulf University (BH)
- Salmaniya Medical Complex (BH)
- Corresponding author
- Al-Ansari, Ahmed M.S.
- Venue
- Heliyon
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e14744
- ISSN
- 2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10073828
- OpenAlex
- W4353051702
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in healthcare, physician attitudes, advantages and disadvantages of AI, job security, AI and employment, Bahrain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review