Cited by 9Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsCoagulation and Flocculation Studies

MnO2 decoration onto the guava leaves: A sustainable and cost-effective material for methylene blue dye removal

Open access
Komby Abdulla, Noufal, Alzahrani, Elham A., Dwivedi, Poonam, Goel, Shruti, Hafeez, Sumbul, Khulbe, Mihir, Ilahi Siddiqui, Sharf, Oh, Seungdae·2024·Heliyon

Abstract

Excessive number of dyes in water is becoming the main cause of water pollution, which is very important to remove because it is harmful. Dye contaminated water is being treated by various methods. Adsorption method can be considered best for the study of dye removal due to several technological reasons. The adsorption method has also been emphasized in this study. In the present work, a nano-bio-composite was fabricated by growing manganese oxide nanoparticles on abundant cellulosic guava leaf powder. This allows nanocomposite to be prepared in large quantities at nominal cost. The characterization technique confirmed the irregular growth of manganese oxide nanoparticles onto the guava leaf powder. The electrostatic and non-electrostatic interactions was confirmed in between manganese oxide nanoparticles and the carbon structure of guava leaf powder. The massive functional groups were found to be in the prepared nano-bio-composite. The grain size of prepared material was in nano range. The developed nano-bio-composite was used to remove methylene blue from water. This showed a very good adsorptive capacity for methylene blue. The analyzed adsorption data was modelled through isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics models. The nature of the adsorption process was determined to be spontaneous and exothermic. The reusability test was carried out for five adsorption-desorption cycles. The reusability results suggested the better removal efficiency (%) in the first two cycles with only 20 % reduction in removal efficiency (%). The leaching test result revealed the good stability of MnO2/GL at neutral pH. It was a unique and cheap adsorbent of its kind, which had not been noticed anywhere before.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34267

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent improvements in the integration of nanomaterials with other substances have enhanced their adsorption effectiveness and decreased manufacturing costs, hence increasing their accessibility for large-scale applications.

    “Recent improvements in the integration of nanomaterials with other substances have enhanced their adsorption effectiveness and decreased manufacturing costs, hence increasing their accessibility for large-scale applications.114”

    From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [114]

    The Introduction says combining nanoparticles with other materials can reduce cost and increase production and adsorption efficiency. It also describes biomass as affordable and available in bulk, but does not establish that these improvements have increased accessibility for large-scale applications. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]Ahamad A. Siddiqui S.E. Singh P. Contamination of water: health risk assessment and treatment strategies 2021 Elsevier
  2. [9]Bistas E. Sanghavi D.K. StatPearls Methylene Blue 2024 Jan StatPearls Publishing Treasure Island (FL) [Updated 2023 Jun 26] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557593/ 32491525
  3. [40]Hafeez S. Sulfur-based advance nanomaterials for water treatment Contamination of Water 2021 Academic Press, Elsevier 405 416

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Komby Abdulla, N., Alzahrani, E. A., Dwivedi, P., Goel, S., Hafeez, S., Khulbe, M., Ilahi Siddiqui, S., & Oh, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Ha'il (SA)
  • University of Delhi (IN)
  • Villanova University (US)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Corresponding author
Oh, Seungdae
Venue
Heliyon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
10
Issue
14
Pages
e34267
ISSN
2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400495890
Cited by
9
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Environment
  • Ministry of Education, India
  • Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
Keywords
manganese oxide nanoparticles, methylene blue adsorption, dye removal, low-cost adsorbent, adsorption isotherms, adsorption kinetics, adsorption thermodynamics, adsorbent reusability, leaching stability, water pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review