Cited by 2Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

Early cardiologist input via LIFENET ECG transmission and pre-hospital thrombolysis achieves improved lysis times for STEMI in a rural setting

Open access
Elder, A., Dunkerton, S., Arnold, R., French, A., Amos, D., Ryan, E., Faddy, S., McMullen, M.·2016·Heart, Lung and Circulation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.627

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rate of failed fibrinolysis in rural areas is approximately 30%, requiring rescue PCI.

    “The rate of failed fibrinolysis in rural areas is approximately 30% [18,19], requiring rescue PCI.”

    From Rural and Remote Cardiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) Consensus Statement (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Methods/Results passage (page not provided) reports that 65 of 104 thrombolysed STEMI patients in Western NSW successfully reperfused, implying about 38% did not—rather than approximately 30%. It does not say that those patients required rescue PCI, and its regional cohort does not establish a rate for rural areas generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Early specialist input improves outcomes and delivers more cost-effective care closer to patients' homes.

    “Early specialist input improves outcomes and delivers more cost-effective care closer to patients' homes [18].”

    From Rural and Remote Cardiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) Consensus Statement (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Results and Conclusion (page not available) report shorter treatment times with pre-hospital thrombolysis and suggest that early cardiologist input could further improve treatment times and reduce mortality in rural STEMI patients. The observed treatment-time trend specifically associated with early cardiologist input was not statistically significant. The paper does not establish improved patient outcomes or assess cost-effectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elder, A., Dunkerton, S., Arnold, R., French, A., Amos, D., Ryan, E., Faddy, S., & McMullen, M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • NSW Ambulance (AU)
Corresponding author
Elder, A.
Venue
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
25
Pages
S269
ISSN
1443-9506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2501838964
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Heart Lung and Circulation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Keywords
ST-elevation myocardial infarction, prehospital thrombolysis, ECG transmission, paramedics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review