Cited by 28COVID-19 and healthcare impactsCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsHealthcare Systems and Challenges

Consensus Guidelines for Interventional Cardiology Services Delivery During COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia and New Zealand

Open access
Lo, S.T.H., Yong, A.S., Sinhal, A., Shetty, S., McCann, A., Clark, D., Galligan, L., El-Jack, S. +16 more·2020·Heart, Lung and Circulation

Abstract

The global coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic poses an unprecedented stress on healthcare systems internationally. These Health system-wide demands call for efficient utilisation of resources at this time in a fair, consistent, ethical and efficient manner would improve our ability to treat patients. Excellent co-operation between hospital units (especially intensive care unit [ICU], emergency department [ED] and cardiology) is critical in ensuring optimal patient outcomes. The purpose of this document is to provide practical guidelines for the effective use of interventional cardiology services in Australia and New Zealand. The document will be updated regularly as new evidence and knowledge is gained with time. Goals Considerations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.04.002

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CSANZ guidelines recommend full PPE for cardiac catheterisation procedures in STEMI, and in patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19.

    “CSANZ guidelines recommend full PPE for cardiac catheterisation procedures in STEMI, and in patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19.”

    From Rural and Remote Cardiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) Consensus Statement (2020) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Practical Considerations section recommends level C PPE for catheterisation patients at high COVID-19 exposure risk, a category that includes suspected and confirmed cases. But it specifies level B PPE for low-risk patients, including those presenting with STEMI; it does not recommend full PPE for every STEMI catheterisation procedure. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Cascella M. Rajnik M. Cuomo A. Dulebohn S. Napoli RD Features, evaluation and treatment coronavirus (COVID-19) StatPearls [Internet] 2020 StatPearls Publishing Treasure Island (FL) 32150360

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lo, S. T. H., Yong, A. S., Sinhal, A., Shetty, S., McCann, A., Clark, D., Galligan, L., El-Jack, S., Sader, M., Tan, R., Hallani, H., Barlis, P., Sechi, R., Dictado, E., Walton, A., Starmer, G., Bhagwandeen, R., Leung, D. Y., Juergens, C. P., Bhindi, R., Muller, D. W. M., Rajaratnum, R., French, J. K., & Kritharides, L.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Austin Hospital (AU)
  • Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
  • Canberra Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Cairns Hospital (AU)
  • John Hunter Hospital (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Lo, S.T.H.
Venue
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
e69-e77
ISSN
1443-9506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022985243
Cited by
28
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart Lung and Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medtronic
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Edwards Lifesciences
  • Pfizer
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Bayer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, interventional cardiology, healthcare resource allocation, triage, intensive care unit, emergency department, interhospital collaboration, clinical guidelines, Australia, New Zealand
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Australia, Cardiology, Critical Care, Humans, Intensive Care Units, New Zealand, Pneumonia, Viral, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Coronavirus Infections, Consensus, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review