Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation

Mattingly, Victoria, Kraiger, Kurt·2019·Human Resource Management Review

Abstract

Abstract Human resource practitioners place value on selecting and training a more emotionally intelligent workforce. Despite this, research has yet to systematically investigate whether emotional intelligence can in fact be trained. This study addresses this question by conducting a meta-analysis to assess the effect of training on emotional intelligence, and whether effects are moderated by substantive and methodological moderators. We identified a total of 58 published and unpublished studies that included an emotional intelligence training program using either a pre-post or treatment-control design. We calculated Cohen's d to estimate the effect of formal training on emotional intelligence scores. The results showed a moderate positive effect for training, regardless of design. Effect sizes were larger for published studies than dissertations. Effect sizes were relatively robust over gender of participants, and type of EI measure (ability v. mixedmodel). Further, our effect sizes are in line with other meta-analytic studies of competency-based training programs. Implications for practice and future research on EI training are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.03.002

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 113 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. *Al-Faouri, 2014, The influence of emotional intelligence training on nurses? Job satisfaction among Jordanian nurses, European Journal of Scientific Research, 117, 486
  2. *Chapman, 2005, Emotional intelligence and coaching: An exploratory study, Vol. 1, 183
  3. *Khodayarifard, 2012, Efficacy of training components of emotional intelligence on social adjustment and social intimacy, Journal of Psychology, 15, 353
  4. *Krishnamurthi, 2008, Reception of emotional intelligence training by management students. ICFAI, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 7, 7
  5. *Zammuner, 2013, Assessing and training leaders' emotional intelligence, and testing its influence on leaders' employees, Journal of Management & Change, 30, 145
  6. Baglin, 2012, An experimental study evaluating error management training for learning to operate a statistical package in an introductory statistics course: Is less guidance more?, International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 48
  7. Jonassen, 1996, An outcomes-based taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation, and research, Training Research Journal, 2, 11

Cited by

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Mattingly, V., & Kraiger, K.
Venue
Human Resource Management Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
140-155
ISSN
1053-4822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2798172567
Cited by
420
References
113
FWCI
44.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.03.002
The paper
Mattingly, V., & Kraiger, K. (2019). Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation. Human Resource Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.03.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.