Cited by 45Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceTeam Dynamics and Performance

Do Agile Managed Information Systems Projects Fail Due to a Lack of Emotional Intelligence?

Open access
Luong, Tan Trung, Sivarajah, Uthayasankar, Weerakkody, Vishanth·2021·Information Systems Frontiers

Abstract

Agile development methodologies (ADM) have become a widely implemented project management approach in Information Systems (IS). Yet, along with its growing popularity, the amount of concerns raised in regard to human related challenges caused by applying ADM are rapidly increasing. Nevertheless, the extant scholarly literature has neglected to identify the primary origins and reasons of these challenges. The purpose of this study is therefore to examine if these human related challenges are related to a lack of Emotional Intelligence (EI) by means of a quantitative approach. From a sample of 194 agile practitioners, EI was found to be significantly correlated to human related challenges in agile teams in terms of anxiety, motivation, mutual trust and communication competence. Hence, these findings offer important new knowledge for IS-scholars, project managers and human resource practitioners, about the vital role of EI for staffing and training of agile managed IS-projects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10796-019-09962-6

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding how people deal with emotional challenges is crucial for AI systems to emulate human reasoning.

    “It is worth mention that emotional intelligence is not part of these systems although understanding how people deal with emotional challenges is crucial for AI systems to emulate human reasoning (Luong et al., 2021).”
  • Emotional intelligence is not part of these AI systems.

    “It is worth mention that emotional intelligence is not part of these systems although understanding how people deal with emotional challenges is crucial for AI systems to emulate human reasoning (Luong et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 141 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th edition ed.): Sage.
  2. Krakovsky, M. (2018). Artificial (Emotional). Intelligence., 61(4), 18.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luong, T. T., Sivarajah, U., & Weerakkody, V.
Affiliations
University of Bradford (GB)
Corresponding author
Luong, Tan Trung
Venue
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2019-11-07
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
415-433
ISSN
  • 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9419
OpenAlex
W2983989774
Cited by
45
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Systems Frontiers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Bradford Scholars (University of Bradford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Bradford
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
agile software development, emotional intelligence, IT project management, agile teams, anxiety, motivation, trust, communication competence, project failure, agile practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review