Cited by 123Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCongenital Heart Disease StudiesAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Ablation of atrial tachycardia after surgery for congenital and acquired heart disease using an electroanatomic mapping system: which circuits to expect in which substrate?

Lukac, Peter, Pedersen, Anders K., Mortensen, Peter T., Jensen, Henrik K., Hjortdal, Vibeke, Hansen, Peter S.·2005·Heart Rhythm

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare atrial tachycardia circuits after a range of cardiac operations.Background Knowledge of circuits occurring in a given postsurgical substrate should help to ablate these challenging tachycardias and develop potential preventive strategies.Methods We analyzed tachycardia circuits in 83 consecutive patients (60 males; median age 47 years, range 9-73) after atrial incisions undergoing ablation of atrial tachycardias. A combined strategy of electroanatomic (CARTO) and entrainment mapping was used. Fifty-two patients (63%) underwent operation for congenital and 31 (37%) for acquired heart disease. Patients were divided into subgroups based on the intervention performed in the atria: right lateral atriotomy (39 patients), left atrial (11) and superior transseptal (10) approach to the mitral valve, biatrial heart transplantation (8), Mustard (8) and Fontan (4) procedure, and other interventions (3).Results Most of the 119 tachycardias mapped were isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (66) and incisional tachycardia (30). Isthmus-dependent atrial flutter was the most frequent arrhythmia in all subgroups except for Fontan patients, in whom incisional tachycardia was most frequent. The distribution of tachycardia circuits did not differ significantly among groups.Conclusions The observed circuits did not differ among the postsurgical substrates. Isthmus-dependent atrial flutter should be the first circuit considered in patients after atrial incisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.10.034

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lukac, P., Pedersen, A. K., Mortensen, P. T., Jensen, H. K., Hjortdal, V., & Hansen, P. S.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Venue
Heart Rhythm
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
64-72
ISSN
1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028767597
Cited by
123
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart Rhythm (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
atrial tachycardia, electroanatomical mapping, isthmus-dependent atrial flutter, congenital heart disease, acquired heart disease, Fontan procedure, Mustard procedure, heart transplantation, entrainment mapping, ablation strategy
MeSH terms
Atrial Flutter, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Defects, Congenital, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Tachycardia, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry, Catheter Ablation, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review