Cited by 73Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Electromechanical coupling in patients with the short QT syndrome: Further insights into the mechanoelectrical hypothesis of the U wave

Open access
Schimpf, Rainer, Antzelevitch, Charles, Haghi, Dariush, Giustetto, Carla, Pizzuti, Alfredo, Gaita, Fiorenzo, Veltmann, Christian, Wolpert, Christian +1 more·2008·Heart Rhythm

Abstract

Background Patients with a short QT syndrome (SQTS) are at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). It is not known whether abbreviation of cardiac repolarization alters mechanical function in SQTS. Controversies persist regarding whether the U wave is a purely electrical or mechanoelectrical phenomenon.Objective The present study uses echocardiographic measurements to discriminate between the hypotheses for the origin of the U wave.Methods Diagnostic work-up including echocardiography and electrocardiogram was performed in 5 SQTS patients (39 +/- 19 years old) from 2 unrelated families with a history of SCD and 5 age-matched and gender-matched control subjects.Results QT intervals were 268 +/- 18 ms (QTc 285 +/- 28 ms) in SQTS versus 386 +/- 20 ms (QTc 420 +/- 22 ms) in control subjects (P < .005). In SQTS patients, the end of the T wave preceded aortic valve closure by 111 +/- 30 ms versus -12 +/- 11 ms in control subjects (P < .005). The interval from aortic valve closure to the beginning of the U wave was 8 +/- 4 ms in patients and 15 +/- 11 ms in control subjects (P = .25). Thus, the inscription of the U wave in SQTS patients coincided with aortic valve closure and isovolumic relaxation, supporting the hypothesis that the U wave is related to mechanical stretch.Conclusion Our data show for the first time a significant dissociation between the ventricular repolarization and the end of mechanical systole in SQTS patients. Coincidence of the U wave with termination of mechanical systole provides support for the mechanoelectrical hypothesis for the origin of the U wave.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.10.015

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In short QT syndrome patients, the inscription of the U wave coincided with aortic valve closure and isovolumic relaxation, supporting the hypothesis that the U wave is related to mechanical stretch.

    “Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic correlations 34 showed that the inscription of the U wave in SQTS patients coincided with aortic valve closure and isovolumic relaxation, supporting the hypothesis that the U wave is related to mechanical stretch.”

    From The Year of 2008 in Electrocardiology (2010) · cites this paper as [34]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]10. Surawicz B. Is the U wave in the electrocardiogram a mechano-electric phenomenon. In: Kohl P, Sachs F, Franz MR, editors. Cardiac Mechano-Electric Feedback and Arrhythmias. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2005, pp 179-190.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schimpf, R., Antzelevitch, C., Haghi, D., Giustetto, C., Pizzuti, A., Gaita, F., Veltmann, C., Wolpert, C., & Borggrefe, M.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE)
  • Masonic Medical Research Laboratory (US)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Schimpf, Rainer
Venue
Heart Rhythm
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
241-245
ISSN
1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976022862
Cited by
73
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart Rhythm (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL047678)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
short QT syndrome, U wave, sudden cardiac death, aortic valve closure, ventricular repolarization, isovolumic relaxation, echocardiography, electrocardiogram
MeSH terms
Adult, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Echocardiography, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Conduction System, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Stroke Volume, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Death, Sudden, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review