Cited by 22Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasECG Monitoring and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a magnetocardiography-based algorithm for discrimination between ventricular arrhythmias originating from the right ventricular outflow tract and those originating from the aortic sinus cusp: A pilot study

Ito, Yoko, Shiga, Keisuke, Yoshida, Kentaro, Ogata, Kuniomi, Kandori, Akihiko, Inaba, Takeshi, Nakazawa, Yoko, Sekiguchi, Yukio, Tada, Hiroshi, Sekihara, Kensuke, Aonuma, Kazutaka·2014·Heart Rhythm

Abstract

Background Although several reports address characteristic 12-lead electrocardiographic findings of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OT-VAs), the accuracy of electrocardiogram-based algorithms to predict the OT-VA origin is sometimes limited. Objective This study aimed to develop a magnetocardiography (MCG)-based algorithm using a novel adaptive spatial filter to differentiate between VAs originating from the aortic sinus cusp (ASC-VAs) and those originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT-VAs). Methods This study comprised 51 patients with an OT-VA as the target of catheter ablation. An algorithm was developed by correlating MCG findings with the successful ablation site. The arrhythmias were classified as RVOT-VAs or ASC-VAs. Three parameters were obtained from 3-dimensional MCG imaging: depth of the origin of the OT-VA in the anteroposterior direction; distance between the earliest atrial activation site, that is, sinus node, and the origin of the OT-VA; and orientation of the arrhythmia propagation at the QRS peak. The distance was indexed to the patient's body surface area (in mm/m2). Results Origins of ASC-VAs were significantly deeper (81 ± 6 mm/m(2) vs. 68 ± 8 mm/m(2); P < .01) and farther from the sinus node (55 ± 9 mm/m2 vs. 41 ± 9 mm/m(2); P < .01) than those of RVOT-VAs. ASC-VA propagation had a tendency toward rightward axis. Receiver operating characteristic analyses determined that the depth of the origin was the most powerful predictor, with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 73% (area under the curve = 0.90; P < .01). Discriminant analysis combining all 3 parameters revealed the accuracy of the localization to be 94%. Conclusion This MCG-based algorithm appeared to precisely discriminate ASC-VAs from RVOT-VAs. Further investigation is required to validate the clinical value of this technique.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.05.032

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For 3D localization accuracy of the arrhythmogenic site of origin, MCG 3D EAI is more competitive than ECGi.

    “Might MCG 3D EAI be more competitive? For 3D localization accuracy of the arrhythmogenic site of origin, surely yes (181, 246, 247, 249).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ito, Y., Shiga, K., Yoshida, K., Ogata, K., Kandori, A., Inaba, T., Nakazawa, Y., Sekiguchi, Y., Tada, H., Sekihara, K., & Aonuma, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
  • Hitachi (Japan) (JP)
  • University of Fukui (JP)
Corresponding author
Yoshida, Kentaro
Venue
Heart Rhythm
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
1605-1612
ISSN
1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130780535
Cited by
22
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart Rhythm (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
magnetocardiography, ventricular arrhythmias, right ventricular outflow tract, arrhythmia localization, adaptive spatial filter, catheter ablation, sinoatrial node
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Sinus of Valsalva, Catheter Ablation, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Magnetocardiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review