Cited by 19Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Mechanisms of postoperative atrial tachycardia following biatrial surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in relation to the surgical lesion sets

Takahashi, Kenta, Miyauchi, Yasushi, Hayashi, Meiso, Iwasaki, Yu-ki, Yodogawa, Kenji, Tsuboi, Ippei, Hayashi, Hiroshi, Oka, Eiichiro +3 more·2016·Heart Rhythm

Abstract

Background Atrial tachycardia (AT) may develop after biatrial surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. However, the mechanism has not been determined in detail.Objective We aimed to determine the mechanism and treatment of postoperative AT following biatrial surgical ablation in relation to the design and durability of the surgical lesion sets.Methods An electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation were performed in 34 consecutive patients (23 male, mean age of 63 ± 9.4 years) who were referred for AT that developed late after biatrial surgical ablation.Results The mechanism of a total of 53 ATs was macroreentry in 30, a focal mechanism in 20, and localized reentry in 1, and could not be determined in 2. The cause of the macroreentrant AT was residual conduction across a surgical lesion, most of which was located at the annular end of the mitral (n = 18) or tricuspid isthmus incision (n = 7), where cryoablation was applied during the surgery. We did not find any gaps across the cut-and-sew lesions. Radiofrequency (RF) applications to the gap, or an alternative site to transect the circuit, or the earliest activation site of the focus was effective for 48 ATs (91%). After a total of 1.3 ± 0.6 RF sessions, 27 patients (79%) were free of AT (n = 2) or AF (n = 5) during a follow-up period of 50 ± 49 months.Conclusions Macroreentry due to a gap in a surgical lesion and focal AT were the major mechanisms of AT in patients after biatrial surgical ablation. Radiofrequency ablation of those ATs is feasible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.12.033

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takahashi, K., Miyauchi, Y., Hayashi, M., Iwasaki, Y.-K., Yodogawa, K., Tsuboi, I., Hayashi, H., Oka, E., Ito Hagiwara, K., Fujimoto, Y., & Shimizu, W.
Affiliations
Nippon Medical School (JP)
Corresponding author
Miyauchi, Yasushi
Venue
Heart Rhythm
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
1059-1065
ISSN
1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2201094535
Cited by
19
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart Rhythm (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, macroreentry, focal atrial tachycardia, cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, atrial reentry
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Cryosurgery, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Body Surface Potential Mapping, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review