Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Typical, atypical, and asymptomatic presentations of new-onset atrial fibrillation in the community: Characteristics and prognostic implications

Open access
Siontis, Konstantinos C., Gersh, Bernard J., Killian, Jill M., Noseworthy, Peter A., McCabe, Pamela, Weston, Susan A., Roger, Veronique L., Chamberlain, Alanna M.·2016·Heart Rhythm

Abstract

Background The prognostic significance of the clinical presentation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is poorly defined. Objective We aimed to determine the frequency, associations, and prognostic impact of different clinical presentations of new-onset AF. Methods One thousand patients with incident AF in Olmsted County, MN, were randomly selected (2000-2010). Patients with AF that was complicated at presentation [heart failure (n=71), thromboembolism (n=24)], provoked (n=346), or unable to determine symptoms (n=83) were excluded. In the remaining patients, characteristics and prognosis associated with different types of symptoms were examined. Results Among 476 patients, 193 had typical (palpitations), 122 had atypical (other non-palpitation symptoms), and 161 had asymptomatic AF presentation. Patients with typical presentation had lower CHA2DS2-VASc scores (mean 2.3±2) compared to atypical and asymptomatic presentation (mean 3.2±1.8 and 3.3±1.9, respectively; p<0.001). Fifty-nine cerebrovascular events (CVE) and 149 deaths (n=49 cardiovascular) were documented over median 5.6 and 6.0 years, respectively. Atypical and asymptomatic AF conferred higher risks of CVE compared to typical AF after adjustment for CHA2DS2-VASc score and age (hazard ratio (HR) 3.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-7.48 and HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.29-5.66, respectively), and associations remained statistically significant after further adjustments including comorbidities and warfarin use. Asymptomatic AF was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.50-6.45) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.89-4.64) compared to typical AF after adjustment for CHA2DS2-VASc score and age. Conclusion The type of clinical presentation may have important implications for the prognosis of new-onset AF in the community.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Siontis, K. C., Gersh, B. J., Killian, J. M., Noseworthy, P. A., McCabe, P., Weston, S. A., Roger, V. L., & Chamberlain, A. M.
Venue
Heart Rhythm
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
1418-1424
ISSN
1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2289502982
Cited by
178
References
5
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Typical, atypical, and asymptomatic presentations of new-onset atrial fibrillation in the community: Characteristics and prognostic implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.003
The paper
Siontis, K. C., Gersh, B. J., Killian, J. M., Noseworthy, P. A., McCabe, P., Weston, S. A., Roger, V. L., & Chamberlain, A. M. (2016). Typical, atypical, and asymptomatic presentations of new-onset atrial fibrillation in the community: Characteristics and prognostic implications. Heart Rhythm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.