Cited by 61Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesMachine Learning in HealthcareECG Monitoring and Analysis

How will machine learning inform the clinical care of atrial fibrillation?

Open access
Siontis, Konstantinos C., Yao, Xiaoxi, Pirruccello, James P., Philippakis, Anthony A., Noseworthy, Peter A.·2020·Circulation Research

Abstract

Machine learning applications in cardiology have rapidly evolved in the past decade. With the availability of machine learning tools coupled with vast data sources, the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), a common chronic disease with significant associated morbidity and socioeconomic impact, is undergoing a knowledge and practice transformation in the increasingly complex healthcare environment. Among other advances, deep-learning machine learning methods, including convolutional neural networks, have enabled the development of AF screening pathways using the ubiquitous 12-lead ECG to detect asymptomatic paroxysmal AF in at-risk populations (such as those with cryptogenic stroke), the refinement of AF and stroke prediction schemes through comprehensive digital phenotyping using structured and unstructured data abstraction from the electronic health record or wearable monitoring technologies, and the optimization of treatment strategies, ranging from stroke prophylaxis to monitoring of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. Although the clinical and population-wide impact of these tools continues to be elucidated, such transformative progress does not come without challenges, such as the concerns about adopting black box technologies, assessing input data quality for training such models, and the risk of perpetuating rather than alleviating health disparities. This review critically appraises the advances of machine learning related to the care of AF thus far, their potential future directions, and its potential limitations and challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circresaha.120.316401

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML tools for optimizing care outcomes have been used in critical care for optimizing sepsis management, management of chronic conditions, and optimizing surgical outcomes.

    “ML tools for optimizing care outcomes have been used in various settings, including critical care for optimizing sepsis management (27), management of chronic conditions (28), and optimizing surgical outcomes (29).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siontis, K. C., Yao, X., Pirruccello, J. P., Philippakis, A. A., & Noseworthy, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
127
Issue
1
Pages
155-169
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W3036926534
Cited by
61
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, machine learning, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, AF screening, 12-lead ECG, cryptogenic stroke, stroke risk prediction, digital phenotyping, electronic health records, wearable monitoring, antiarrhythmic therapy, stroke prevention, health disparities, model interpretability, data quality
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review