Cited by 77Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsNursing care and researchIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Home discharge following critical illness: A qualitative analysis of family caregiver experience

Open access

Abstract

Background Few studies have longitudinally explored the experience and needs of family caregivers of ICU survivors after patients' home discharge.Methods Qualitative content analysis of interviews drawn from a parent study that followed family caregivers of adults ICU survivors for 4 months post-ICU discharge.Results Family caregivers (n = 20, all white, 80% woman) viewed home discharge as positive progress, but reported having insufficient time to transition from family visitor to the active caregiver role. Caregivers expressed feelings of relief during the steady recovery of family members' physical and cognitive function. However, the slow pace of improvement conflicted with their expectations. Even after patients achieved independent physical function, emotional needs persisted and these issues contributed to caregivers' anxiety, worry, and view that recovery was incomplete.Conclusion Family caregivers of ICU survivors need information and skills to help managing patients' care needs, pacing expectations with actual patients' progress, and caregivers' health needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.04.003

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The updated literature search identified no new RCTs but two meta-analyses comparing continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapies.

    “Our updated literature search identified no new RCTs but two meta-analysis comparing continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapies (503, 504).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [503]

    The Methods (Data Analysis; page unavailable) describe qualitative analysis of caregiver interviews, not an updated literature search. Searches of our copy for renal replacement therapies, RCTs, and the claimed meta-analyses found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Family caregivers of critically ill patients discharged home felt overwhelmed, unprepared, and had difficulty managing expectations.

    “Family caregivers of critically ill patients discharged home felt overwhelmed and unprepared and had difficulty managing expectations [593].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, J., Lingler, J. H., Donahoe, M. P., Happ, M. B., Hoffman, L. A., & Tate, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Choi, JiYeon
Venue
Heart & Lung
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
401-407
ISSN
0147-9563 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799482615
Cited by
77
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart & Lung (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (F32 NR 011271, T32 NR 008857)
  • Fellow Research Award from Rehabilitation Nursing Foundation (FEL-0905)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
family caregivers, intensive care unit survivors, home discharge, critical illness, caregiver experiences, caregiver anxiety, caregiver needs, caregiver education, post-ICU recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Family, Female, Patient Care, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Critical Illness, Caregivers, Survivors, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review