The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement
Ting, L. H., & McKay, J. L. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.01.002 · Cited by 514
A Review on Lower Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Robots
Shi, D., Zhang, W., Zhang, W., & Ding, X. (2019) · Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1186/s10033-019-0389-8 · Cited by 508
Dynamic Principles of Gait and Their Clinical Implications
Kuo, A. D., & Donelan, J. M. (2010) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20090125 · Cited by 485
Self-citationGaze and the Control of Foot Placement When Walking in Natural Terrain
Matthis, J. S., Yates, J. L., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.008 · Cited by 424
Control of human gait stability through foot placement
Bruijn, S. M., & van Dieën, J. H. (2018) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0816 · Cited by 424
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuo, A. D.
- Venue
- Human Movement Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 617-656
- ISSN
- 0167-9457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149464084
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.humov.2007.04.003
- The paper
- Kuo, A. D. (2007). The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective. Human Movement Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.04.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
