Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Control of human gait stability through foot placement

Bruijn, Sjoerd M., van Dieën, Jaap H.·2018·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Abstract

During human walking, the centre of mass (CoM) is outside the base of support for most of the time, which poses a challenge to stabilizing the gait pattern. Nevertheless, most of us are able to walk without substantial problems. In this review, we aim to provide an integrative overview of how humans cope with an underactuated gait pattern. A central idea that emerges from the literature is that foot placement is crucial in maintaining a stable gait pattern. In this review, we explore this idea; we first describe mechanical models and concepts that have been used to predict how foot placement can be used to control gait stability. These concepts, such as for instance the extrapolated CoM concept, the foot placement estimator concept and the capture point concept, provide explicit predictions on where to place the foot relative to the body at each step, such that gait is stabilized. Next, we describe empirical findings on foot placement during human gait in unperturbed and perturbed conditions. We conclude that humans show behaviour that is largely in accordance with the aforementioned concepts, with foot placement being actively coordinated to body CoM kinematics during the preceding step. In this section, we also address the requirements for such control in terms of the sensory information and the motor strategies that can implement such control, as well as the parts of the central nervous system that may be involved. We show that visual, vestibular and proprioceptive information contribute to estimation of the state of the CoM. Foot placement is adjusted to variations in CoM state mainly by modulation of hip abductor muscle activity during the swing phase of gait, and this process appears to be under spinal and supraspinal, including cortical, control. We conclude with a description of how control of foot placement can be impaired in humans, using ageing as a primary example and with some reference to pathology, and we address alternative strategies available to stabilize gait, which include modulation of ankle moments in the stance leg and changes in body angular momentum, such as rapid trunk tilts. Finally, for future research, we believe that especially the integration of consideration of environmental constraints on foot placement with balance control deserves attention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsif.2017.0816

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 116

  1. 10.1098/rsif.2012.0999 · DOI
  2. 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.1.33 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-1-349-09148-5_31 · DOI
  4. 10.1152/jn.00730.2011 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0006-8993(86)91233-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0966-6362(96)82849-9 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/027836499000900206 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.1107799 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/02783649922066655 · DOI
  10. Kim M, 2013, Stabilization of a three-dimensional limit cycle walking model through step-to-step ankle control, IEEE Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robot, 2013, 6650437
  11. 10.1098/rsif.2014.0958 · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0073597 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1242/jeb.129338 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0021-9290(84)90080-0 · DOI
  15. 10.1123/kr.2017-0053 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00101-9 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.015 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.04.013 · DOI
  19. 10.1242/jeb.042572 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s00221-013-3655-5 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0021-9290(85)90042-9 · DOI
  22. Kajita S Tani K. 1991 Study of dynamic biped locomotion on rugged terrain-derivation and application of the linear inverted pendulum mode. In Proc. of 1991 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation Sacramento CA 9–11 April pp. 1405–1411. New York NY: IEEE. · DOI
  23. Pratt J Carff J Drakunov S Goswami A. 2006 Capture point: a step toward humanoid push recovery. In Proc. of 2006 6th IEEE-RAS Int. Conf. on Humanoid Robots Genova Italy 4–6 December pp. 200–207. New York NY: IEEE. · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00165-0 · DOI
  25. 10.1152/jn.00266.2005 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.004 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.025 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.04.003 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.027 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.010 · DOI
  31. 10.1115/1.2815334 · DOI
  32. 10.1115/1.4000193 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.011 · DOI
  34. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3637 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.humov.2007.04.003 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.humov.2007.08.003 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00169-5 · DOI
  38. 10.1115/1.1427703 · DOI
  39. 10.1177/0278364912452673 · DOI
  40. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1761 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.021 · DOI
  42. 10.1109/TBME.2007.901031 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.06.039 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.005 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.06.002 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.01.007 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.001 · DOI
  48. 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0405 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1098/rsos.160627 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.12.026 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.059 · DOI
  52. 10.1007/s002210050738 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s00221-010-2424-y · DOI
  54. 10.1007/s00221-013-3748-1 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90027-C · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.027 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.008 · DOI
  58. 10.1152/jn.00138.2014 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00197-2 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/s00221-014-3885-1 · DOI
  61. 10.1152/jn.00131.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.003 · DOI
  63. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0931s.x · DOI
  64. 10.1152/jn.01260.2003 · DOI
  65. 10.1097/00003677-200507000-00002 · DOI
  66. 10.1007/s00221-005-2364-0 · DOI
  67. 10.1097/00001756-200507130-00013 · DOI
  68. 10.1152/jn.00764.2006 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.017 · DOI
  70. 10.1007/s00221-001-0962-z · DOI
  71. 10.1152/jn.00551.2015 · DOI
  72. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6472-10.2011 · DOI
  73. 10.3758/BF03199297 · DOI
  74. 10.1152/jn.00516.2003 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.03.007 · DOI
  76. 10.1073/pnas.0607687103 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1007/s00221-014-4185-5 · DOI
  79. 10.1152/jn.00434.2015 · DOI
  80. 10.1152/jn.00103.2014 · DOI
  81. 10.1152/jn.00867.2015 · DOI
  82. 10.3200/JMBR.38.2.118-125 · DOI
  83. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00621.2011 · DOI
  84. 10.1152/jn.00843.2012 · DOI
  85. 10.1007/s00221-004-1854-9 · DOI
  86. 10.1002/mus.22265 · DOI
  87. 10.4085/1062-6050-49.5.07 · DOI
  88. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.610360 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.002 · DOI
  90. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00170 · DOI
  91. 10.1093/gerona/glr214 · DOI
  92. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.11.008 · DOI
  93. 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00104 · DOI
  94. 10.1152/jn.00744.2012 · DOI
  95. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00593 · DOI
  96. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.013 · DOI
  97. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb00946.x · DOI
  98. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.02.009 · DOI
  99. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.020 · DOI
  100. Sale P, 2013, The relation between Parkinson's disease and ageing. Comparison of the gait patterns of young Parkinson's disease subjects with healthy elderly subjects, Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med., 49, 161
  101. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.07.013 · DOI
  102. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.011 · DOI
  103. 10.1177/0898264307299308 · DOI
  104. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.005 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.047 · DOI
  106. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.02.013 · DOI
  107. 10.1007/s002210050867 · DOI
  108. Moraes R, 2004, Strategies and determinants for selection of alternate foot placement during human locomotion: influence of spatial and temporal constraints, Exp. Brain Res., 159, 1
  109. 10.1152/jn.00044.2006 · DOI
  110. 10.1098/rspb.2013.0700 · DOI
  111. 10.1037/a0033101 · DOI
  112. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.016 · DOI
  113. 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00062 · DOI
  114. 10.1186/s12984-015-0027-3 · DOI
  115. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.016 · DOI
  116. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.008 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Bruijn, S. M., & van Dieën, J. H.
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2018-06
Volume
15
Issue
143
Pages
20170816
ISSN
  • 1742-5689
  • 1742-5662
Cited by
424
References
2
Language
en
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.Vidi.178.014)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review