The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative analyses of rider position according to skill levels during walk and trot in Jeju horse
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rider position at walk and trot as a function of rider skill level by analyzing joint angles. Participants included three advanced riders and six beginners, and training was conducted for one hour, twice a week for 24 weeks. In the walk stage of the beginners' group, the elbows and shoulders sustained postures comparable to those of the advanced riders group; the trunk tilted forwards at first, but later it tilted slightly behind the vertical. The knee, ankle, and left-right angle kept stable postures after 12 weeks of training (p<.05). The front-rear (FR) angle of the beginners group improved during training, but it was still lower than the advanced riders group after 24 weeks of training (p<.05). At trot, while the knee angle measurement of the beginners' group was similar to the advanced riders, the ankle joint sustained a forward point posture. The ankle joint maintained dorsiflexion posture with 83.9°±5.3 in the advanced riders group, while the beginners group had plantar flexion posture with 98.7°±6.0. This study suggested that the correlation between the joint and body segment angles could be an important indicator in the evaluation of rider proficiency.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Universally, equestrian does not define or outline a consistent approach to riding or horse-handling capabilities, levels or skills due to the complexity of the horse-rider relationship.
“Universally, equestrian does not define or outline a consistent approach [47,48] to riding or horse-handling capabilities, levels or skills due to the complexity of the horse-rider relationship [49,50].”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Clayton, 2005, Strain gauge measurement of rein tension during riding: A pilot study, Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology, 2, 203, 10.1079/ECP200553 · DOI
- Keshner, 2003, Head–trunk coordination during linear anterior–posterior translations, Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 1891, 10.1152/jn.00836.2001 · DOI
- Lovett, 2004, A preliminary investigation of rider position during walk, trot and canter, Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology, 2, 71, 10.1079/ECP200444 · DOI
- Panni, 1994, Analysis of the movements involved in horse riding, Journal of Sports Traumatology and Related Research, 16, 196
- Peham, 2004, Influence of the rider on the variability of the equine gait, Human Movement Science, 23, 663, 10.1016/j.humov.2004.10.006 · DOI
- Schils, 1993, Kinematic analysis of the equestrian–walk, posting trot and sitting trot, Human Movement Science, 12, 693, 10.1016/0167-9457(93)90011-D · DOI
- Terada, 2006, Stabilization of wrist position during horseback riding at trot, Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology, 3, 179, 10.1017/S1478061506337255 · DOI
- Witte, 2009, Motion pattern analysis of gait in horseback riding by means of principal component analysis, Human Movement Science, 28, 394, 10.1016/j.humov.2009.04.002 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, O.-D., Ryu, Y.-C., Ryew, C.-C., Oh, W.-Y., Lee, C.-E., & Kang, M.-S.
- Venue
- Human Movement Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 956-963
- ISSN
- 0167-9457
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
