The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, neuropilin-1) are associated with worse outcome in breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor has been shown to be upregulated in breast cancers. VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 are the principal mediators of its effects. Together with VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, neuropilin-1 may act as a co-receptor for VEGF. Although VEGF exerts important effects on endothelial cells, VEGFRs are likely present on tumor cells as well. We used AQUA to analyze tumor-specific expression of VEGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and neuropilin-1 on a large cohort breast cancer tissue microarray. Two-fold redundant arrays were constructed from 642 cases of primary breast adenocarcinomas. Automated image analysis with AQUA was then performed to determine a quantitative expression score. Scores from redundant arrays were normalized and averaged. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that high levels of VEGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and neuropilin-1 were all significantly associated with survival (Miller Siegmeund corrected P value 0.0020, 0.0160, and 0.0320 respectively). In addition, VEGF and neuropilin-1 retained a significant association with survival independent of other standard prognostic factors. VEGF, VEGFR-1 and 2, and neuropilin-1 are expressed to varying degrees in primary breast cancers and have prognostic significance. Further study of the functional significance of this finding is warranted as well as the prognostic value of these biomarkers in other tumor microenvironment-specific compartments (e.g. vessels).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dangers of Using "Optimal" Cutpoints in the Evaluation of Prognostic Factors
Altman, D. G., Lausen, B., Sauerbrei, W., & Schumacher, M. (1994) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/86.11.829 · Cited by 1,143
Cited by
Angiogenic signaling pathways and anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer
Liu, Z.-L., Chen, H.-H., Zheng, L.-L., Sun, L.-P., & Shi, L. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01460-1 · Cited by 1,300
Goel, H. L., & Mercurio, A. M. (2013) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3627 · Cited by 1,253
Modi, S. J., & Kulkarni, V. M. (2019) · Medicine in Drug Discovery · doi:10.1016/j.medidd.2019.100009 · Cited by 320
Significance of immunohistochemistry in breast cancer
Zaha, D. C. (2014) · World Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.382 · Cited by 277
Prud’homme, G. J., & Glinka, Y. (2012) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.626 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghosh, S., Sullivan, C. A. W., Zerkowski, M. P., Molinaro, A. M., Rimm, D. L., Camp, R. L., & Chung, G. G.
- Venue
- Human Pathology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1835-1843
- ISSN
- 0046-8177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020709543
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, neuropilin-1) are associated with worse outcome in breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.humpath.2008.06.004
- The paper
- Ghosh, S., Sullivan, C. A. W., Zerkowski, M. P., Molinaro, A. M., Rimm, D. L., Camp, R. L., & Chung, G. G. (2008). High levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, neuropilin-1) are associated with worse outcome in breast cancer. Human Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2008.06.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.