Cited by 115Extraction and Separation ProcessesChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

Precipitation behavior of Ca(OH)2, Mg(OH)2, and Mn(OH)2 from CaCl2, MgCl2, and MnCl2 in NaOH-H2O solutions and study of lithium recovery from seawater via two-stage precipitation process

Um, Namil, Hirato, Tetsuji·2014·Hydrometallurgy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.04.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Um, N., & Hirato, T.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Environmental Research (KR)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Um, Namil
Venue
Hydrometallurgy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
146
Pages
142-148
ISSN
0304-386X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031993195
Cited by
115
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Hydrometallurgy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
lithium recovery, seawater, precipitation behavior, calcium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, manganese hydroxide, lithium carbonate, chemical modeling, evaporative concentration, carbonation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review