Dendrochronological dating and provenancing of timber used as foundation piles under historic buildings in The Netherlands
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Robust Juniperus spp. tree-ring chronologies from Kültepe, Acemhöyük, and Karahöyük Konya securely crossdate following standard dendrochronological methods and evaluation, both within and between sites, and combine into a robust floating 300-year MBA juniper chronology.
“Robust Juniperus spp. tree-ring chronologies from three Middle Bronze Age (MBA) sites in Anatolia (Fig 2)–Kültepe (KUL) and Acemhöyük (ACM), plus one other site, Karahöyük Konya (KBK) [20, 23, 31] (and see Section A in S1 File)–do securely crossdate following standard dendrochronological methods and evaluation [32–39], both within and between sites with no doubt as to veracity”
From Integrated Tree-Ring-Radiocarbon High-Resolution Timeframe to Resolve Earlier Second Millennium BCE Mesopotamian Chronology (2016) · cites this paper as [35]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe part of the chronology linking Gordion and Porsuk contains very low sample depth-just 1 or 2 trees in the Gordion chronology-too few for any secure crossdating following standard dendrochronological methods, making the best available match highly tentative at best.
“First, the part of the chronology linking Gordion and Porsuk contains very low sample depth–with just 1 or 2 trees in the Gordion chronology (Fig 3, Figures A, B in S1 File)–too few for any secure crossdating following standard dendrochronological methods [32–35]”
From Integrated Tree-Ring-Radiocarbon High-Resolution Timeframe to Resolve Earlier Second Millennium BCE Mesopotamian Chronology (2016) · cites this paper as [35]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Manning, S. W., Griggs, C. B., Lorentzen, B., Barjamovic, G., Ramsey, C. B., Kromer, B., & Wild, E. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157144 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“First, the part of the chronology linking Gordion and Porsuk contains very low sample depth–with just 1 or 2 trees in the Gordion chronology (Fig 3, Figures A, B in S1 File)–too few for any secure crossdating following standard dendrochronological methods [32–35], which makes the best available match, whether statisti…”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Sass-Klaassen, U., Vernimmen, T., & Baittinger, C.
- Affiliations
- National Museum of Denmark (DK)
- ORCID
- Baittinger, Claudia
- Venue
- International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 96-105
- ISSN
- 0964-8305 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100292189
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
- Keywords
- dendrochronology, historic buildings, felling dates, tree origin, local timber, short time series, bacterial degradation, timber deterioration, Netherlands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
