Cited by 22Cognitive Science and MappingBehavioral Health and InterventionsComplex Systems and Decision Making

Dealing with complexity: How to use a hybrid approach to incorporate complexity in health behavior interventions

Open access
Mkhitaryan, Samvel, Giabbanelli, Philippe J., de Vries, Nanne K., Crutzen, Rik·2020·Intelligence-Based Medicine

Abstract

In the process of developing interventions targeting health behaviors (e.g., smoking cessation, safe sex, healthy nutrition), intervention planners interact with multiple types of information coming from various sources (e.g. theory, previous research, input from stakeholders). Intervention planners then need to meaningfully integrate this information into an analytical framework that guides the construction of the intervention components. Commonly used frameworks often oversimplify human behaviors despite acknowledging their inherent complexity. For instance, frameworks include chains of lists (in logic models) instead of richer structures considering loops and the dynamicity of relations between determinants. There is thus a lack of systematic approaches to effectively form such rich structures in health behavior interventions. While integrating many aspects of complexity in logic models may be possible, it also runs the risk of producing artifacts that become equally complex instead of equipping intervention planners and health researchers with decision-making tools to estimate the effects of interventions. Consequently, effective intervention development requires (i) techniques of systematic integration of information of different types and from various sources, which can account for (ii) the complex structure and functioning of interactions between the identified behavioral determinants, and (iii) will support the testing of intervention scenarios. In this paper, we show how a hybrid approach of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and machine learning may support various aspects of complexity in intervention design by meeting all three requirements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ibmed.2020.100008

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Loef MW. The combined effects of healthy lifestyle behaviors on all cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2012:163-70. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.06.017. · DOI
  2. Eldredge LKB, Markham CM, Ruiter RA, Fern andez ME, Kok G, Parcel GS. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
  3. Ruiter RA, Crutzen R. Core processes: how to use evidence, theories, and research in planning behavior change interventions. Front Public Health 2020;8:247.
  4. Frood S, Johnston LM, Matteson CL, Finegood DT. Obesity, complexity, and the role of the health system. Current obesity reports 2013;2(4):320-6.
  5. Finegood DM. The complex systems science of obesity. In: Cawley J, editor. Oxford handbook of the social science of obesity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 208-36.
  6. Mooney SJ. Systems thinking in population health research and policy. In: El- Sayed Aa, editor. Systems science and population health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 49-60.
  7. Barbrook-Johnson P, Schimpf C, Castellani B. Reflections on the use of complexity- appropriate computational modeling for public policy evaluation in the UK. J Pol Complex Syst 2019;5(1):55-70.
  8. Hong SL, Hain SJ. Complicated vs. Complex, disease vs. Illness: rethinking diagnosis, therapy, and restoring health. In: The value of systems and complexity sciences for healthcare. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 29-37.
  9. Katerndahl DA. Viewing mental health through the lens of complexity science. In: The value of systems and complexity sciences for healthcare. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 133-45.
  10. Camorlinga P, Camorlinga S. Leading the emergency department as a complex adaptive system. In: The value of systems and complexity sciences for healthcare. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 205-16.
  11. Fink DS, Keyes KM. When simple interpretations create complex problems. In: El- Sayed Aa, editor. Systems science and population health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 25-36.
  12. Giabbanelli PJ. Analyzing the complexity of behavioural factors influencing weight in adults. In: Advanced data analytics in health. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 163-81.
  13. Giabbanelli PJ, Baniukiewicz M. Navigating complex systems for policymaking using simple software tools. In: Advanced data analytics in health. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 21-40.
  14. Verigin TG. Supporting a systems approach to healthy weight interventions in british columbia by modeling weight and well-being. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Simulation Symposium . Pasadena: Society for Computer Simulation International; 2016.
  15. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Psychology press; 2011.
  16. Dub e L, Addy NA, Blouin C, Drager N. From policy coherence to 21st century convergence: a whole-of-society paradigm of human and economic development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2014;1331:201-15.
  17. Dub e L, Pingali P, Webb P. Paths of convergence for agriculture, health, and wealth. Proc Natl Acad Sci Unit States Am 2012;109(31):12294-301.
  18. Fink DS, Keyes KM, Cerd a M. Social determinants of population health: a systems sciences approach. Current epidemiology reports 2016;3(1):98-105.
  19. Orr MZ. Systems of behavior and population health. In: A. A. El-sayed, systems Science and population health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 167-80.
  20. Resnicow K, Page SE. Embracing chaos and complexity: a quantum change for public health. Am J Public Health 2008;98(8):1382-9.
  21. Giabbanelli PJ, Crutzen R. Using agent-based models to develop public policy about food behaviours: future directions and recommendations. Comput Math Methods Med 2017;2017:5742629.
  22. Papageorgiou EI. Learning algorithms for fuzzy cognitive maps-a review study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 2011;42(2):150-63.
  23. Davis CG, Giabbanelli PJ, Jetter AJ. The intersection of agent based models and fuzzy cognitive maps: a review of an emerging hybrid modeling practice. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference. National Harbor. Maryland: IEEE/ACM; 2019.
  24. Davies R. Representing theories of change: technical challenges with evaluation consequences. J Dev Effect 2018:438-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 19439342.2018.1526202. · DOI
  25. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social-cognitive view. Acad Manag Rev 1987:169-71. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538. · DOI
  26. Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychol Rev 1985:548-73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Geyer R, Rihani S. Complexity and public policy: a new approach to 21st century politics, policy and society. London: Routledge; 2012.
  28. Lewin K. Principles of topological psychology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc; 1936.
  29. Green LW. Public health asks of systems science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? Am J Publ Health 2006:406-9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.066035. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Richard LG. Ecological models revisited: their uses and evolution in health promotion over two decades. Annu Rev Publ Health 2011;32:307-26.
  31. Carey Ga. Systems change for the social determinants of health. BMC Publ Health 2015;15(1):662.
  32. Johnston LM. Systems science and obesity policy: a novel framework for analyzing and rethinking population-level planning. Am J Public Health 2014;104(7):1270-8.
  33. Malhi LK. Places to intervene to make complex food systems more healthy, green, fair, and affordable. J Hunger Environ Nutr 2009;4(3-4):466-76.
  34. Korbx K, Nicholson A. Bayesian artificial intelligence. CRC Press; 2004.
  35. Gray SA, Zanre E, Gray S. Fuzzy cognitive maps as representations of mental models and group beliefs. In: Fuzzy cognitive maps for applied sciences and engineering. . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2014. p. 29-48.
  36. Firmansyah HS, Supangkat SH, Arman AA, Giabbanelli PJ. Identifying the components and interrelationships of smart cities in Indonesia: supporting policymaking via fuzzy cognitive systems. IEEE Access; 2019. p. 46136-51.
  37. Amirkhani A, Papageorgiou E, Mohseni A, Mosavi M. A review of fuzzy cognitive maps in medicine: taxonomy, methods, and applications. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 2017:129-45.
  38. Glykas M. Fuzzy cognitive maps: advances in theory, methodologies, tools and applications. Springer; 2010.
  39. Papageorgiou EI, Salmeron JL. A review of fuzzy cognitive maps research during the last decade. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2012:66-79.
  40. Giabbanelli PJ. Modelling the spatial and social dynamics of insurgency. Secur Inf 2014;3(1):2.
  41. Harvey N, Holmes CA. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. Int J Nurs Pract 2012;18(2):188-94.
  42. Reddy T, Giabbanelli PJ, Mago VK. The artificial facilitator: guiding participants in developing causal maps using voice-activated technologies. Cham: Springer; 2019.
  43. Li Z, Zhang X. On fuzzy logic and chaos theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2007.
  44. Groumpos PP. Fuzzy cognitive maps. In: Glykas, Fuzzy cognitive maps: basic theories and their application to complex systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. p. 1-22.
  45. Felix G, N apoles G, Falcon R, Froelich W, Vanhoof K, Bello R. A review on methods and software for fuzzy cognitive maps. Artif Intell Rev 2019:1707-37.
  46. Stach W, Kurgan L, Pedrycz W. Data-driven nonlinear Hebbian learning method for fuzzy cognitive maps. IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence; 2008, June. p. 1975-81.
  47. Koulouriotis DE, Diakoulakis IE, Emiris DM. May). Learning fuzzy cognitive maps using evolution strategies: a novel schema for modeling and simulating high-level behavior. In: Evolutionary computation, 2001. Proceedings of the 2001 congress. IEEE; 2001. p. 364-71.
  48. Voinov A, Jenni K, Gray S, Kolagani N, Glynn PD, Bommel P, et al. Tools and methods in participatory modeling: selecting the right tool for the job. Environ Model Software 2018;109:232-55.
  49. Felix G, N apoles G, Falcon R, Froelich W, Vanhoof K, Bello R. A review on methods and software for fuzzy cognitive maps. Artif Intell Rev 2017:1-31.
  50. Harmati I A, K oczy LT. Notes on the dynamics of hyperbolic tangent fuzzy cognitive maps. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE). IEEE; 2019, June. p. 1-6.
  51. Wu K, Liu J, Chi Y. Wavelet fuzzy cognitive maps. Neurocomputing 2017;232: 94-103.
  52. Papageorgiou Konstantinos, Singh Pramod K. Elpiniki Papageorgiou, harpalsinh chudasama, dionysis bochtis, and george stamoulis. "Fuzzy cognitive map-based sustainable socio-economic development planning for rural communities. Sustainability 2020;12(1):305.
  53. Lynch CJ, Diallo SY. A taxonomy for classifying terminologies that describe simulations with multiple models. In: Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). IEEE; 2015, December. p. 1621-32.
  54. Mustafee N, Powell J, Brailsford SC, Diallo S, Padilla J, Tolk A. Hybrid simulation studies and hybrid simulation systems: definitions, challenges, and benefits. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE; 2015, December. p. 1678-92.
  55. Powell J, Mustafee N. Soft OR approaches in problem formulation stage of a hybrid M&S study. In: Proceedings of the 2014 winter simulation conference. IEEE Press; 2014, December. p. 1664-75.
  56. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical Research. Br Med J 2015;350:h1258.
  57. Harkaway JE. Obesity and systems research: the complexity of studying complexities. Fam Syst Health 2000;18(1):55.
  58. Giabbanelli PJ, Gray SA, Aminpour P. Combining fuzzy cognitive maps with agent- based modeling: frameworks and pitfalls of a powerful hybrid modeling approach to understand human-environment interactions. Environ Model Software 2017;95: 320-5.
  59. Carley KM, Morgan G, Lanham M, Pfeffer J. Multi-modeling and sociocultural complexity. In: Schmorrow, & nicholson, advances in design for cross-cultural activities Part II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2012. p. 128-37.
  60. Giabbanelli PJ, Voinov AA, Castellani B, T€ ornberg P. Ideal, best, and emerging practices in creating artificial societies. In: Proceedings of the Annual Simulation Symposium (p. 2). Society for Computer Simulation International; 2019, April.
  61. Giabbanelli P, Fattoruso M, Norman ML. Confluences: simulating the spread of social influences via a hybrid agent-based/fuzzy cognitive maps architecture. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSIM conference on principles of advanced discrete simulation (pp. 71-82). ACM; 2019, May.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mkhitaryan, S., Giabbanelli, P. J., de Vries, N. K., & Crutzen, R.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Miami University (US)
Corresponding author
Mkhitaryan, Samvel
Venue
Intelligence-Based Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
3-4
Pages
100008
ISSN
2666-5212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095686160
Cited by
22
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Intelligence-Based Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
Keywords
health behavior interventions, intervention design, complexity, fuzzy cognitive maps, machine learning, logic model, behavioral factors, stakeholder feedback, intervention planning, intervention scenarios

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review