Cited by 1,260Evaluation and Performance AssessmentHealth Policy Implementation SciencePublic Health Policies and Education

The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health

Open access
Rutter, Harry, Savona, Natalie, Glonti, Ketevan, Bibby, Jo, Cummins, Steven, Finegood, Diane T, Greaves, Felix, Harper, Laura +7 more·2017·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31267-9

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The traditional action research cycle of needs assessment, development, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation suggests a logical, causal process that is difficult to identify in a complex school system initiative where changes interact with each other and with contextual aspects.

    “Traditionally, many action researchers in school interventions have followed the cycle of needs assessment, development, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of change [23,24]. However, the limitation of following these steps is that they suggest a logical, causal process, which is difficult to identify in a complex school system initiative [25], where changes are interacting with each other”
  • Randomization is neither desirable nor feasible in this study.

    “Since randomization is neither desirable nor feasible here [26], a quasi-experimental study design is used.”
  • Thinking about systems helps us understand the interaction between an intervention and the context in which it is implemented in a dynamic way.

    “Thinking about systems helps us understand the interaction between an intervention and the context in which it is implemented in a dynamic way.22”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rutter, H., Savona, N., Glonti, K., Bibby, J., Cummins, S., Finegood, D. T., Greaves, F., Harper, L., Hawe, P., Moore, L., Petticrew, M., Rehfuess, E., Shiell, A., Thomas, J., & White, M.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Health Foundation (GB)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Rutter, Harry
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
390
Issue
10112
Pages
2602-2604
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2626277945
Cited by
1,260
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 149 · 2020: 193 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 24
FWCI
102.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12017/14)
  • Chief Scientist Office (SPHSU14)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
complex systems, public health evidence, evidence-based public health, causal inference, public health interventions, intervention implementation
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Theoretical, Public Health, Public Health Administration, Systems Analysis, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review