The three-dimensional structure of Saturn’s equatorial jet at cloud level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The corresponding vertical shear of the zonal flow, about 1-2 x 10^-3 s^-1, is similar to that measured by the Galileo probe on Jupiter between 0.7 and 4 bar and to that inferred from Cassini data for Saturn between 0.05 and 0.8 bar.
“The corresponding vertical shear of the zonal flow, ;1-2 3 10 23 s 21 , is similar to that measured by the Galileo probe on Jupiter between 0.7 and 4 bar (Atkinson et al. 1998) and to that inferred from Cassini data for Saturn between 0.05 and 0.8 bar (Sanchez-Lavega et al. 2007; see also the zonal-flow observations at different levels in Fig. 1).”
From Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets (2010) · cites this paper as Sanchez-Lavega et al. 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Sánchez-Lavega, A., Hueso, R., & Pérez-Hoyos, S.
- Affiliations
- University of the Basque Country (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Sánchez-Lavega, A.
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 510-519
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038770131
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Icarus (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
- Keywords
- Saturn, equatorial jet, cloud tracking, stratospheric haze, methane absorption bands, radiative transfer modeling, Cassini Imaging Science Subsystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
