Cited by 135Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets

Open access
Liu, Junjun, Schneider, Tapio·2010·Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

Abstract

The giant planet atmospheres exhibit alternating prograde (eastward) and retrograde (westward) jets of different speeds and widths, with an equatorial jet that is prograde on Jupiter and Saturn and retrograde on Uranus and Neptune. The jets are variously thought to be driven by differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere or by intrinsic heat fluxes emanating from the deep interior. However, existing models cannot account for the different flow configurations on the giant planets in an energetically consistent manner. Here a three-dimensional general circulation model is used to show that the different flow configurations can be reproduced by mechanisms universal across the giant planets if differences in their radiative heating and intrinsic heat fluxes are taken into account. Whether the equatorial jet is prograde or retrograde depends on whether the deep intrinsic heat fluxes are strong enough that convection penetrates into the upper troposphere and generates strong equatorial Rossby waves there. Prograde equatorial jets result if convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies generated off the equator is sufficiently weak (Jupiter and Saturn). Retrograde equatorial jets result if either convective Rossby wave generation is weak or absent (Uranus) or low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies is sufficiently strong (Neptune). The different speeds and widths of the off-equatorial jets depend, among other factors, on the differential radiative heating of the atmosphere and the altitude of the jets, which are vertically sheared. The simulations have closed energy and angular momentum balances that are consistent with observations of the giant planets. They exhibit temperature structures closely resembling those observed and make predictions about as yet unobserved aspects of flow and temperature structures.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A three-dimensional general circulation model reproduces the contrasting giant-planet jet configurations by invoking universal mechanisms: convective Rossby wave generation near the equator and baroclinic eddy generation off the equator. Prograde equatorial jets occur when convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude eddy angular momentum flux divergence is weak; retrograde jets occur when convective Rossby wave generation is weak/absent or baroclinic eddy divergence is strong.

Key findings

  • The simulations reproduce equatorial superrotation on Jupiter and Saturn and equatorial subrotation on Uranus and Neptune, with Jupiter’s simulated equatorial jet at ~150 m s⁻¹ and Saturn’s at ~230 m s⁻¹; Neptune’s simulated equatorial jet at the shown level is ~240 m s⁻¹ but weaker than observed.
  • The paper attributes Jupiter/Saturn superrotation to strong convective Rossby wave generation near the equator, with rms Rossby wave source ~10⁻¹⁰ s⁻² for Jupiter and Saturn versus ~10⁻¹² s⁻² for Neptune.
  • Neptune control simulations show that enhancing the intrinsic heat flux to Saturn’s 2.01 W m⁻² (from Neptune’s 0.433 W m⁻²) or suppressing baroclinic eddy generation by uniform insolation both produce equatorial superrotation.
  • Simulated equator-to-pole brightness temperature contrasts are 10 K for Jupiter, 7 K for Saturn, 8 K for Uranus, and 2 K for Neptune, broadly consistent with observations; eddy-to-mean kinetic energy conversion rates are 0.09 and 0.026 W m⁻² for Jupiter and Saturn, about 0.6% of total atmospheric energy uptake.

Methods

  • The study uses a dry ideal-gas hydrostatic primitive-equation GCM in a thin spherical shell, with T85–T213 horizontal spectral resolution and 30 or 40 vertical levels; the lower boundary is at 3 bar, insolation is perpetual equinox without a diurnal cycle, and observed intrinsic heat fluxes are imposed (5.70, 2.01, 0.04, and 0.43 W m⁻² for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune).
  • Linear Rayleigh drag acts near the lower boundary outside an equatorial no-drag region extending to 33° latitude, representing deep MHD drag; simulations were spun up from an isothermal rest state for at least 40,000 Earth days, and statistics are averaged over 1500 days.
  • Control simulations vary the intrinsic heat flux, suppress baroclinic instability by imposing uniform insolation, and alter the drag formulation to test the proposed jet-formation mechanisms.

Limitations

  • The paper states that current computational resources prevent simulating deep giant-planet flows, so the model focuses on upper atmospheres with an artificial lower boundary; the drag formulation is poorly constrained by data or physics, and the convection scheme does not transport momentum (zero convective Prandtl number), an idealization that may affect results.
  • The paper also states that it ignores seasonal cycles and obliquity effects on insolation, and that solar optical properties of giant-planet atmospheres are not well constrained, so unconstrained parameters are set equal to Jupiter’s to minimize inter-simulation differences.
  • Evident from the text: the thin-shell domain, idealized gray radiative transfer, and imposed uniform intrinsic heat flux are simplifications; the authors argue these do not affect the qualitative jet-formation mechanisms but may affect quantitative aspects such as jet strength and vertical shear.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/2010jas3492.1

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 88 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The Uranus and Neptune simulations exhibit a single off-equatorial jet in each hemisphere.

    “The Uranus and Neptune simulations exhibit a single off-equatorial jet in each hemisphere.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The simulations exhibit temperature structures closely resembling those observed.

    “They exhibit temperature structures closely resembling those observed”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The simulations reproduce large-scale features of the observed flows in the upper atmosphere.

    “The simulations reproduce large-scale features of the observed flows in the upper atmosphere (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the equatorial region in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, the waves are organized into large wave packets.

    “In the equatorial region in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, the waves are organized into large wave packets (Fig. 3, left column).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The prograde equatorial jets in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations strengthen with depth.

    “The prograde equatorial jets in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations strengthen with depth (Fig. 5, left column).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 80
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Meridional gradients of both absolute vorticity and quasigeostrophic potential vorticity at the levels shown in Fig. 1 are small near zonal velocity minima and are reversed near some of them.

    “Indeed, meridional gradients of both absolute vorticity and quasigeostrophic potential vorticity at the levels at which the zonal velocities are shown in Fig. 1 are small near zonal velocity minima and are reversed near some of them (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Jupiter and Saturn simulations exhibit equatorial superrotation, and the Uranus and Neptune simulations exhibit equatorial subrotation.

    “The Jupiter and Saturn simulations exhibit equatorial superrotation, the Uranus and Neptune simulations equatorial subrotation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The equatorial jet in the Saturn simulation is stronger (about 230 m/s) and slightly wider than that in the Jupiter simulation, but it is weaker and narrower than the observed jet at a corresponding level on Saturn.

    “The equatorial jet in the Saturn simulation is stronger (;230 m s 21 ) and slightly wider than that in the Jupiter simulation, but it is weaker and narrower than the observed jet at a corresponding level on Saturn.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The overall structure of the jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations is roughly consistent with observations, but the equatorial jet in the Neptune simulation at the level shown (about 240 m/s) is considerably weaker than that observed.

    “The overall structure of the jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations is roughly consistent with observations, but the equatorial jet in the Neptune simulation at the level shown (;240 m s 21 ) is considerably weaker than that observed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The equatorial jet in the Jupiter simulation has similar strength (about 150 m/s) and width as the observed jet.

    “The equatorial jet in the Jupiter simulation has similar strength (;150 m s 21 ) and width as the observed jet.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In general, the prograde jets (or zonal velocity maxima) are sharper than the retrograde jets (or zonal velocity minima), consistent with the zonal velocity maxima being barotropically more stable.

    “In general, the prograde jets (or zonal velocity maxima) are sharper than the retrograde jets (or zonal velocity minima), consistent with the zonal velocity maxima being barotropically more stable (Rhines 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rhines 1994 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Jupiter and Saturn simulations exhibit alternating off-equatorial jets; they are broader than the observed jets but of similar strength.

    “The Jupiter and Saturn simulations exhibit alternating offequatorial jets; they are broader than the observed jets but of similar strength.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In the Saturn simulation, the equator-to-pole brightness temperature contrast is 7 K, consistent with observations.

    “In the Saturn simulation, the equator-topole brightness temperature contrast is 7 K, consistent with observations (Ingersoll 1990;Fletcher et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ingersoll 1990 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fletcher et al. 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the Saturn simulation, the prograde polar jet at 68 degrees N exhibits a wavenumber-8 or -9 undulation, with a zonal phase velocity of -24 m/s.

    “In the Saturn simulation, for example, the prograde polar jet at 688N exhibits a wavenumber-8 or -9 undulation (Fig. 4), with a zonal phase velocity of 224 m s 21 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In the equatorial upper troposphere in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, where the prograde jets strengthen with depth, temperatures decrease equatorward and have a minimum at the equator.

    “Therefore, in the equatorial upper troposphere in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, where the prograde jets strengthen with depth, temperatures decrease equatorward and have a minimum at the equator (Fig. 5, contours in right column).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In the Uranus and Neptune simulations, the equator-to-pole brightness temperature contrasts are 8 and 2 K, respectively, consistent with observations.

    “In the Uranus and Neptune simulations, the equator-to-pole brightness temperature contrasts are 8 and 2 K, respectively, consistent with observations (Ingersoll 1990).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ingersoll 1990 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Away from the equator, prograde jets generally weaken with depth and retrograde jets strengthen slightly or do not vary much with depth.

    “Away from the equator, prograde jets generally weaken with depth and retrograde jets strengthen slightly or do not vary much with depth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In the Jupiter simulation with an atmosphere of 3-bar thickness, the radiative time scale is about 10 Earth years; it is about 50 Earth years in the Saturn simulation.

    “In the Jupiter simulation with an atmosphere of 3-bar thickness, the radiative time scale is ;10 Earth years; it is ;50 Earth years in the Saturn simulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The large coherent vortices extend all the way to the bottom of the domain, with the magnitude of the vorticity decreasing weakly with depth: the peak vorticity at the bottom of the domain is about 80% of its maximum value in the column.

    “They extend all the way to the bottom of the domain, with the magnitude of the vorticity decreasing weakly with depth: the peak vorticity at the bottom of the domain is about 80% of its maximum value in the column.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The corresponding vertical shear of the zonal flow, about 1-2 x 10^-3 s^-1, is similar to that measured by the Galileo probe on Jupiter between 0.7 and 4 bar and to that inferred from Cassini data for Saturn between 0.05 and 0.8 bar.

    “The corresponding vertical shear of the zonal flow, ;1-2 3 10 23 s 21 , is similar to that measured by the Galileo probe on Jupiter between 0.7 and 4 bar (Atkinson et al. 1998) and to that inferred from Cassini data for Saturn between 0.05 and 0.8 bar (Sanchez-Lavega et al. 2007; see also the zonal-flow observations at different levels in Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Atkinson et al. 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sanchez-Lavega et al. 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The large coherent vortices are cyclonic, with typical vorticities of magnitude about 2 x 10^-5 s^-1.

    “The large coherent vortices are cyclonic, with typical vorticities of magnitude ;2 3 10 25 s 21 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The retrograde equatorial jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations are strongest in the stratosphere and weaken with depth, consistent with inferences drawn from gravity measurements with the Voyager 2 spacecraft.

    “The retrograde equatorial jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations are strongest in the stratosphere and weaken with depth, consistent with inferences drawn from gravity measurements with the Voyager 2 spacecraft (Hubbard et al. 1991).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hubbard et al. 1991 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The jets are evident not only in long-term averages but also in instantaneous flow fields.

    “The jets are evident not only in long-term averages but also in instantaneous flow fields.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The large coherent vortices are advected by the flow in their environment and have a local temperature minimum at the center (about 10 K lower temperature than the environment).

    “They are advected by the flow in their environment and have a local temperature minimum at the center (;10 K lower temperature than the environment).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the global mean, the conversion rates are 0.09 and 0.026 W m^-2 in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, respectively, implying that the conversion rate in either simulation is about 0.6% of the total energy uptake of the atmosphere.

    “In the global mean, the conversion rates are 0.09 and 0.026 W m 22 in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, respectively, implying that the conversion rate in either simulation is about 0.6% of the total energy uptake of the atmosphere.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The off-equatorial jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations are situated in the stratosphere and are broader than those in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.

    “The off-equatorial jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations are situated in the stratosphere and are broader than those in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    This angular momentum transport has a baroclinic structure and, in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, is in structure and magnitude consistent with observations.

    “It has a baroclinic structure and, in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, is in structure and magnitude consistent with observations (cf.Ingersoll et al. 1981;Salyk et al. 2006;Del Genio et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ingersoll et al. 1981 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Salyk et al. 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Del Genio et al. 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The eddy angular momentum flux divergence at the stratospheric jet cores is not even of a consistent sign at all times but exhibits considerable low-frequency variability.

    “It is not even of a consistent sign at all times but exhibits considerable low-frequency variability, as indicated by the differences between the statistically identical hemispheres in the long-term (1500-day) averages shown in Fig. 7.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The jets become very weak below the tropopause and, particularly in the Uranus simulation, give way to a tropospheric zonal flow with smaller meridional scales.

    “The jets become very weak below the tropopause and, particularly in the Uranus simulation, give way to a tropospheric zonal flow with smaller meridional scales (Fig. 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Without intrinsic heat fluxes and the convection that they induce, a Jupiter simulation similar to the one here exhibits equatorial subrotation; the same is true for the Jupiter and Saturn simulations here.

    “In SL09, we demonstrated that without intrinsic heat fluxes and the convection that they induce, a Jupiter simulation similar to the one here exhibits equatorial subrotation; the same is true for the Jupiter and Saturn simulations here.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SL09

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The vorticity-mixing estimate is also roughly consistent with our simulations, although a state of homogenized absolute vorticity in the equatorial region of each hemisphere is not attained in the simulations.

    “It is also roughly consistent with our simulations, although a state of homogenized absolute vorticity in the equatorial region of each hemisphere is not attained in the simulations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    If the same enhanced drag is used at all latitudes, without an equatorial no-drag region, there is no large-scale prograde jet at the equator, while the off-equatorial flow is not substantially modified.

    “However, if the same enhanced drag is used at all latitudes, without an equatorial no-drag region, there is no large-scale prograde jet at the equator, while the off-equatorial flow is not substantially modified (Fig. 9c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In the Uranus simulation, the intrinsic heat flux is negligible, the atmosphere is stably stratified, and there is no substantial convective Rossby wave source near the equator.

    “In the Uranus simulation, the intrinsic heat flux is negligible, the atmosphere is stably stratified, and there is no substantial convective Rossby wave source near the equator.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In the Uranus simulation, the equatorial eddy kinetic energy is weak, and the equatorial flow is retrograde.

    “Consequently, the equatorial eddy kinetic energy is weak, and the equatorial flow is retrograde.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the Neptune simulation, the rms Rossby wave source R' in the upper troposphere near the equator is approximately 10^-12 s^-2, whereas for Jupiter and Saturn it is approximately 10^-10 s^-2.

    “the rms Rossby wave source R9 in the upper troposphere near the equator is ;10 212 s 22 for Neptune but ;10 210 s 22 for Jupiter and Saturn.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Because eddy angular momentum fluxes in our simulations generally diverge in retrograde tropospheric jets, or zonal velocity minima, and converge in prograde tropospheric jets, or zonal velocity maxima, the mean meridional mass flux in the off-equatorial upper troposphere is generally poleward in retrograde jets and equatorward in prograde jets.

    “Because eddy angular momentum fluxes in our simulations generally diverge in retrograde tropospheric jets, or zonal velocity minima, and converge in prograde tropospheric jets, or zonal velocity maxima, the mean meridional mass flux in the off-equatorial upper troposphere is generally poleward in retrograde jets and equatorward in prograde jets (Fig. 7).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    This approach gave statistically steady states in which the angular momentum balance is closed in a manner that is physically plausible and consistent with observations.

    “This approach gave statistically steady states in which the angular momentum balance is closed in a manner that is physically plausible and consistent with observations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    In the statistically steady states, the global-mean outgoing thermal radiative flux is within 1% of the sum of the global-mean solar radiative flux and the imposed intrinsic heat flux.

    “In the statistically steady states, the global-mean outgoing thermal radiative flux is within 1% of the sum of the global-mean solar radiative flux and the imposed intrinsic heat flux.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the Jupiter simulation, the stratification at the corresponding level is nearly statically neutral, so potential vorticity is not well defined.

    “It is not shown for the Jupiter simulation because the stratification at the corresponding level is nearly statically neutral (cf.Fig.5below), so potential vorticity is not well defined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The simulations exhibit temperature structures that are broadly consistent with available observations, and they reproduce many details of the observed flows, for example, their vertical structure to the extent it is known and characteristic equatorial waves observed on Jupiter.

    “They exhibit temperature structures that are broadly consistent with available observations, and they reproduce many details of the observed flows, for example, their vertical structure to the extent it is known and characteristic equatorial waves observed on Jupiter.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Retrograde equatorial jets result if either convective Rossby wave generation is weak or absent, as on Uranus, or low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies is sufficiently strong, as on Neptune.

    “Retrograde equatorial jets result if either convective Rossby wave generation is weak or absent (Uranus) or low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies is sufficiently strong (Neptune).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The equatorial jet is prograde on Jupiter and Saturn and retrograde on Uranus and Neptune.

    “with an equatorial jet that is prograde on Jupiter and Saturn and retrograde on Uranus and Neptune.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Prograde equatorial jets result if convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies generated off the equator is sufficiently weak, as on Jupiter and Saturn.

    “Prograde equatorial jets result if convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies generated off the equator is sufficiently weak (Jupiter and Saturn).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Deep-flow models that posit intrinsic heat fluxes as the sole driver of the flow can generate equatorial superrotation, but they use heat fluxes more than 10^6 times larger than those observed.

    “For example, deep-flow models that posit intrinsic heat fluxes as the sole driver of the flow can generate equatorial superrotation, but they use heat fluxes more than 10 6 times larger than those observed (e.g., Heimpel and Aurnou 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heimpel and Aurnou 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Jupiter and Saturn have multiple off-equatorial jets in each hemisphere, while Uranus and Neptune have only a single off-equatorial jet in each hemisphere.

    “Jupiter and Saturn have multiple off-equatorial jets in each hemisphere; Uranus and Neptune have only a single off-equatorial jet in each hemisphere.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In SL09, the authors postulated that prograde equatorial jets on the giant planets occur when intrinsic heat fluxes are strong enough that Rossby waves generated convectively in the equatorial region transport angular momentum toward the equator.

    “In Schneider and Liu (2009, hereafter SL09), we postulated that prograde equatorial jets on the giant planets occur when intrinsic heat fluxes are strong enough that Rossby waves generated convectively in the equatorial region transport angular momentum toward the equator.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schneider and Liu (2009)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This total energy conversion rate is already about 4% of the total energy uptake of the atmosphere from intrinsic heat fluxes and absorption of solar radiation for Jupiter, or about 11% for Saturn.

    “This is already ;4% of the total energy uptake of the atmosphere from intrinsic heat fluxes and absorption of solar radiation for Jupiter, or ;11% for Saturn.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The observations of Jupiter and Saturn imply that eddy angular momentum fluxes cannot extend unabatedly over great depths and must have a baroclinic structure.

    “The observations of Jupiter and Saturn therefore imply that eddy angular momentum fluxes cannot extend unabatedly over great depths and must have a baroclinic structure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Uranus and Neptune have retrograde equatorial jets that peak at about 100 m/s and about 150-400 m/s.

    “Uranus and Neptune have retrograde equatorial jets (subrotation) that peak at ;100 m s 21 and ;150-400 m s 21 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Deep-flow models generate equatorial subrotation only with intrinsic heat fluxes even stronger than those for which they generate superrotation, although the intrinsic heat fluxes on Uranus and Neptune are weaker than those on Jupiter and Saturn.

    “They generate equatorial subrotation only with intrinsic heat fluxes even stronger than those for which they generate superrotation (Aurnou et al. 2007), although the intrinsic heat fluxes on the subrotating planets (Uranus and Neptune) are weaker than those on the superrotating planets (Jupiter and Saturn).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aurnou et al. 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The northern and southern hemispheres in the simulations are statistically identical, so differences between the hemispheres in figures showing long-term averages are indicative of the sampling variability of the averages.

    “The northern and southern hemispheres in the simulations are statistically identical, so differences between the hemispheres in figures showing long-term averages are indicative of the sampling variability of the averages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Jupiter and Saturn have prograde equatorial jets that peak at about 100 m/s and about 200-400 m/s, depending on the vertical level considered.

    “Jupiter and Saturn have prograde equatorial jets (superrotation) that peak at ;100 m s 21 and ;200-400 m s 21 , depending on the vertical level considered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The simulations were run to statistically steady states after long spinup periods.

    “We show simulation results from statistically steady states, which were reached after long spinup periods; see the appendix for details.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    It is unclear in shallow-flow models what physical characteristics distinguish the superrotating planets from the subrotating planets.

    “It is unclear in those and other shallow-flow models (e.g., Scott and Polvani 2008) what physical characteristics distinguish the superrotating planets from the subrotating planets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scott and Polvani 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing models posit as the driver of the flow either the differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere or the intrinsic heat fluxes emanating from the deep interior.

    “Existing models posit as the driver of the flow either the differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere (e.g., Williams 1979Williams , 2003b) ) or the intrinsic heat fluxes emanating from the deep interior (e.g., Busse 1976;Heimpel et al. 2005;Aurnou et al. 2007;Chan and Mayr 2008;Kaspi et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Williams 1979 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Busse 1976 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Heimpel et al. 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The resolution in each simulation (T85 to T213 spectral resolution in the horizontal and 30 or 40 levels in the vertical) is sufficient to resolve baroclinic instability and the energy-containing eddies in the upper atmosphere.

    “The resolution in each simulation (T85 to T213 spectral resolution in the horizontal and 30 or 40 levels in the vertical) is sufficient to resolve baroclinic instability and the energy-containing eddies in the upper atmosphere.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shallow-flow models that posit differential radiative heating as the driver of the flow can generate equatorial superrotation, but they require artifices such as additional equatorial heat or wave sources that have no clear physical interpretation.

    “Similarly, shallow-flow models that posit differential radiative heating as the driver of the flow can generate equatorial superrotation, but they require artifices such as additional equatorial heat or wave sources that have no clear physical interpretation (e.g., Williams 2003a,b;Yamazaki et al. 2005;Lian and Showman 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Williams 2003a,b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yamazaki et al. 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lian and Showman 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Consistent with thermal wind balance, temperatures increase equatorward along isobars where prograde jets weaken with depth or retrograde jets strengthen with depth, and they decrease equatorward where the opposite is true.

    “Consistent with thermal wind balance, temperatures increase equatorward along isobars where prograde jets weaken with depth or retrograde jets strengthen with depth, and they decrease equatorward where the opposite is true.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The vorticity profiles indicate that barotropic instability limits the sharpening of the retrograde jets, though not to the degree that the statistically steady states of the flows would satisfy sufficient conditions for linear barotropic stability for unforced and nondissipative flows.

    “The vorticity profiles indicate that barotropic instability limits the sharpening of the retrograde jets, though not to the degree that the statistically steady states of the flows would satisfy sufficient 1.The quasigeostrophic potential vorticity is calculated analogously to Read et al. (2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The undulation is retrograde, and retrograde relative to the mean flow, consistent with the undulation being a Rossby wave.

    “This is retrograde, and retrograde relative to the mean flow, consistent with the undulation being a Rossby wave.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Coherent vortices preferentially exist in regions where absolute vorticity or potential vorticity gradients vanish, as they can then arise spontaneously in barotropic or quasigeostrophic flows and remain stable.

    “Coherent vortices preferentially exist in regions where absolute vorticity or potential vorticity gradients vanish, as they can then arise spontaneously in barotropic or quasigeostrophic flows and remain stable (e.g., McWilliams 1984;Marcus 1988Marcus , 1993)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites McWilliams 1984 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Marcus 1988 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Marcus 1993 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since the radiative time scale increases with pressure, it is longer for deeper atmospheres, which might explain why the observed coherent vortices such as the Great Red Spot on Jupiter are so long lived.

    “Since the radiative time scale increases with pressure, it is longer for deeper atmospheres, which might explain why the observed coherent vortices such as the Great Red Spot on Jupiter are so long lived.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These cyclonic vortices are long lived, with life spans apparently determined by the radiative time scale.

    “These cyclonic vortices are long lived, with life spans apparently determined by the radiative time scale (the time scale on which eddies can modify the mean flow).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Away from the equator, the differential radiative heating of the upper atmospheres produces meridional temperature gradients, which are baroclinically unstable and lead to eddy generation.

    “Away from the equator, the differential radiative heating of the upper atmospheres produces meridional temperature gradients, which are baroclinically unstable and lead to eddy generation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    More generally, entropy is constant along angular momentum surfaces, to achieve a state of neutrality with respect to slantwise convection.

    “[More generally, entropy is constant along angular momentum surfaces, to achieve a state of neutrality with respect to slantwise convection; see Emanuel (1983) and Thorpe and Rotunno (1989).]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Emanuel (1983) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Thorpe and Rotunno (1989)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The fundamental reason for the different flow and temperature structures in the giant planet simulations lies in the different strengths of the differential radiative heating and the intrinsic heat flux and in the different ways in which the two can lead to the generation of the eddies that maintain the jets.

    “The fundamental reason lies in the different strengths of the differential radiative heating and the intrinsic heat flux and in the different ways in which the two can lead to the generation of the eddies that maintain the jets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There are no observations of entropy or temperature distributions below the upper troposphere for the giant planets, but the authors expect them to behave similarly as in their simulations.

    “There are no observations of entropy or temperature distributions below the upper troposphere for the giant planets, but we expect them to behave similarly as in our simulations, for the reasons discussed in section 5c below.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although temperature contrasts at the emission level are generally small, equator-to-pole temperature contrasts at higher or lower levels of the simulated atmospheres differ, and the same is likely true for the actual planets.

    “However, although temperature contrasts at the emission level are generally small, equator-to-pole temperature contrasts at higher or lower levels of the simulated atmospheres differ, and the same is likely true for the actual planets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fluctuations in convective heating are primarily balanced by vertical motion and, at the level of the convective outflows, by horizontal divergence of mass fluxes, as in the tropics of Earth's atmosphere.

    “Fluctuations in convective heating are primarily balanced by vertical motion and, at the level of the convective outflows, by horizontal divergence of mass fluxes, as in the tropics of Earth's atmosphere.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sobel et al. 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because the planetary vorticity vanishes at the equator, the Rossby wave source R' typically has largest amplitude just off the equator, but it does not necessarily vanish at the equator or where the absolute vorticity vanishes because absolute vorticity advection by the divergent flow may not vanish.

    “Because the planetary vorticity vanishes at the equator, the Rossby wave source R9 typically has largest amplitude just off the equator, but it does not necessarily vanish at the equator or where the absolute vorticity vanishes because absolute vorticity advection by the divergent flow may not vanish.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fluctuations in the horizontal divergence are a source of equatorial Rossby waves, and the fluctuating vorticity source R' can be taken to be the Rossby wave source.

    “As discussed in Sardeshmukh and Hoskins (1988), fluctuations in the horizontal divergence are a source of equatorial Rossby waves, and the fluctuating vorticity source”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sardeshmukh and Hoskins (1988)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Fluctuations in convective heating lead to horizontal divergence fluctuations, which can generate equatorial Rossby waves through stretching of absolute vorticity or advection of absolute vorticity by the divergent flow.

    “Thus, fluctuations in convective heating lead to horizontal divergence fluctuations (1), which can generate equatorial Rossby waves through stretching of absolute vorticity z a or advection of absolute vorticity by the divergent flow v x (2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The angular momentum transport toward the equatorial region by convectively generated Rossby waves leads to equatorial superrotation if it is sufficiently strong and drag on the zonal flow is sufficiently weak.

    “The angular momentum transport toward the equatorial region by convectively generated Rossby waves leads to equatorial superrotation if it is sufficiently strong and drag on the zonal flow is sufficiently weak (SL09).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SL09

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Convectively generated Rossby waves transport angular momentum toward the equatorial region because this is where they are preferentially generated.

    “This is generally to be expected for such convectively generated Rossby waves: they transport angular momentum toward the equatorial region because this is where they are preferentially generated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The structure of the stratospheric jets implies that they interact only weakly with the drag at the lower boundary, so only weak eddy angular momentum flux divergence is necessary to maintain them.

    “The structure of the stratospheric jets implies that they interact only weakly with the drag at the lower boundary, so only weak eddy angular momentum flux divergence is necessary to maintain them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Rossby wave source R' owing to horizontally divergent flow has largest amplitude in the equatorial region because only there will convective heating fluctuations necessarily lead to horizontal divergence fluctuations on large scales; away from the equator, the WTG approximation does not hold.

    “The Rossby wave source R9 owing to horizontally divergent flow has largest amplitude in the equatorial region because only there will convective heating fluctuations necessarily lead to horizontal divergence fluctuations on large scales; away from the equator, the WTG approximation (1) of the thermodynamic equation does not hold.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SL09

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Off-equatorial baroclinic eddy generation implies angular momentum flux convergence in the off-equatorial generation regions and divergence in lower latitudes, and hence a tendency toward retrograde equatorial flow.

    “Off-equatorial baroclinic eddy generation implies angular momentum flux convergence in the off-equatorial generation regions and divergence in lower latitudes, and hence a tendency toward retrograde equatorial flow.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Vorticity mixing arguments give an estimate for the maximum strength of the equatorial jet: if the end state of vorticity mixing is a state in which the absolute vorticity is homogenized across the equatorial jet in each hemisphere separately, with a barotropically stable jump at the equator, and if the jet half-width L_s is similar to the equatorial Rossby radius L_b, the jet speed at the equator

    “Vorticity mixing arguments give an estimate for the maximum strength of the equatorial jet (Rhines 1994; SL09): If the end state of vorticity mixing is a state in which the absolute vorticity is homogenized across the equatorial jet in each hemisphere separately, with a barotropically stable jump at the equator, and if the jet half-width L s is similar to the equatorial Rossby radius L b , the jet”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rhines 1994 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SL09

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Neptune's intrinsic heat flux only needs to be larger by an O(1) factor for Neptune's atmosphere to develop equatorial superrotation, implying that Neptune may have been superrotating earlier in its history, when intrinsic heat fluxes were stronger.

    “Interestingly, our simulations suggest that Neptune's intrinsic heat flux only needs to be larger by an O(1) factor for Neptune's atmosphere to develop equatorial superrotation, implying that Neptune may have been superrotating earlier in its history, when intrinsic heat fluxes were stronger.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The vorticity-mixing estimate is roughly consistent with observations of Jupiter and Saturn, although the maximum equatorial jet speed on Saturn is not known for lack of observations deeper in the atmosphere.

    “This is roughly consistent with observations of Jupiter and Saturn (but the maximum equatorial jet speed on Saturn is not known for lack of observations deeper in the atmosphere).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The same pattern of eddy angular momentum fluxes and mean meridional mass flux is almost certainly true on Jupiter and Saturn, where similar eddy angular momentum fluxes in the upper troposphere have been observed.

    “The same is almost certainly true on Jupiter and Saturn, where similar eddy angular momentum fluxes in the upper troposphere have been observed (Salyk et al. 2006;Del Genio et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Salyk et al. 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Del Genio et al. 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Neither the precise functional form of the drag, nor the magnitude of the drag coefficient where it is nonzero, nor the width of the no-drag region appears to be essential for our results-as long as there is an equatorial region with no or sufficiently low drag such that a large-scale prograde jet can form.

    “However, neither the precise functional form of the drag, nor the magnitude of the drag coefficient where it is nonzero, nor the width of the no-drag region appears to be essential for our results-as long as there is an equatorial region with no or sufficiently low drag such that a large-scale prograde jet can form.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Convection tends to homogenize entropy along columns in the direction of the planet's spin axis (in deep atmospheres) or in the vertical (in thin atmospheres); however, it does not constrain entropy gradients in perpendicular directions.

    “Therefore, convection tends to homogenize entropy along columns in the direction of the planet's spin axis (in deep atmospheres) or in the vertical (in thin atmospheres); however, it does not constrain entropy gradients in perpendicular directions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Convection in general does not homogenize entropy in directions perpendicular to angular momentum surfaces, so an isentropic interior cannot be assumed a priori.

    “However, convection in general does not homogenize entropy in directions perpendicular to angular momentum surfaces, so an isentropic interior cannot be assumed a priori.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The WTG approximation holds where the Rossby number satisfies Ro << 1 and the Froude number satisfies Fr << 1.

    “The WTG approximation holds where the Rossby number satisfies Ro U/jfLj * 1 and the Froude number satisfies Fr 5 UV/(gH) ( 1, where U is a zonal velocity scale, V a meridional or eddy velocity scale, L a length scale of flow variations, and H the scale height(Charney 1963; SL09).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Charney 1963 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SL09

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The thermal optical depths t_l0 at pressure p0 are chosen such that the observed thermal emission levels of the giant planets approximately correspond to t_l = 1.

    “The thermal optical depths t l0 at pressure p 0 are chosen such that the observed thermal emission levels (e.g., Ingersoll 1990) of the giant planets approximately correspond to t l 5 1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ingersoll 1990 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The depth of that layer can be expected to affect quantitative aspects such as the vertical shear of the zonal flow, but we do not expect it to affect the qualitative aspects and large-scale flow features on which we have focused.

    “The depth of that layer can be expected to affect quantitative aspects such as the vertical shear of the zonal flow, but we do not expect it to affect the qualitative aspects and large-scale flow features on which we have focused.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Equatorial superrotation is generated if convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies generated off the equator is sufficiently weak (Jupiter and Saturn); equatorial subrotation results if either convective Rossby wave generation is weak or absent (Uranus) or low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclin-

    “We have demonstrated that equatorial superrotation is generated if convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies generated off the equator is sufficiently weak (Jupiter and Saturn); equatorial subrotation results if either convective Rossby wave generation is weak or absent (Uranus) or low-latitude angular momentum flux”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    To the extent that vertical shear and convective momentum fluxes cannot be neglected, they may amplify the superrotation in the upper troposphere in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.

    “But to the extent that the vertical shear and convective momentum fluxes cannot be neglected, they may amplify the superrotation in the upper troposphere in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, as the equatorial zonal flow in those simulations is stronger at depth than in the upper troposphere, so that convection can be expected to transport momentum upward.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The convection scheme assumes a convective Prandtl number of zero (does not transport momentum).
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the interiors of Jupiter and Saturn, the conductivity of molecular hydrogen increases with depth and becomes approximately constant where hydrogen becomes metallic at ~1.4 Mbar.

    “In the interior of Jupiter and Saturn, the conductivity of molecular hydrogen increases with depth and becomes approximately constant where hydrogen becomes metallic at ;1.4 Mbar (Nellis et al. 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nellis et al. 1996 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the high-conductivity interior, the interaction of the magnetic field and the fluid flow produces Ohmic dissipation and retards the flow.

    “In the high-conductivity interior, the interaction of the magnetic field and the fluid flow produces Ohmic dissipation and retards the flow (Liu et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liu et al. 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Where the convective Rossby number is not necessarily small, convective plumes are aligned with angular momentum (M) surfaces.

    “More generally, where the convective Rossby number is not necessarily small, convective plumes are aligned with angular momentum (M) surfaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Where latent heat release in phase changes of water is dynamically important, a moist entropy can be expected to be homogenized in the direction of the spin axis.

    “Where latent heat release in phase changes of water is dynamically important, a moist entropy rather than a dry entropy should be considered, and such a moist entropy can be expected to be homogenized in the direction of the spin axis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    If entropy deviations from an isentropic reference state are not small so that the anelastic approximation cannot be made, the thermal wind balance becomes more complicated.

    “If entropy deviations from an isentropic reference state are not small so that the anelastic approximation cannot be made, the thermal wind balance (13) becomes more complicated(Kaspi et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kaspi et al. 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All parameter choices are constrained by knowledge of the physical properties of the planets and material properties of their atmospheres, as well as by observations where available.

    “All parameter choices are constrained by knowledge of the physical properties of the planets and material properties of their atmospheres, as well as by observations where available.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Latent heat release in phase changes of water does not represent an external heat source, merely a conversion between forms of energy, and hence it does not affect the integrated energy balance.

    “Latent heat release in phase changes of water may play a role in that layer, but it does not represent an external heat source, merely a conversion between forms of energy, and hence it does not affect the integrated energy balance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    This does not affect the qualitative considerations on which the paper's conclusions are based.

    “But this does not affect the qualitative considerations on which our conclusions are based.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the interiors of Uranus and Neptune, the conductivity of the gas envelope increases with depth and is determined by the conductivity of hydrogen and water ice.

    “In the interior of Uranus and Neptune, the conductivity of the gas envelope likewise increases with depth and is determined by the conductivity of hydrogen and water ice (Nellis et al. 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nellis et al. 1997 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    By choosing drag formulations that differ from planet to planet, better fits to observations could be obtained.

    “By choosing drag formulations that differ from planet to planet, better fits to observations could be obtained (cf.section 4d).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
94 of 94
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The solar optical properties of the giant planet atmospheres are not well constrained.

    “The solar optical properties of the giant planet atmospheres are not well constrained.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Prandtl numbers for dry convection are usually greater than zero.

    “Prandtl numbers for dry convection are usually greater than zero”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The drag formulation at the artificial lower boundary of the GCM is poorly constrained by data or physics.

    “However, the drag formulation at the artificial lower boundary of the GCM is poorly constrained by data or physics.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The convection scheme assumes a convective Prandtl number of zero (does not transport momentum).

    “The convection scheme does not transport momentum; that is, it assumes a convective Prandtl number of zero.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Linear (Rayleigh) drag acts near the GCM's lower boundary, but only outside an equatorial latitude band.

    “We assume linear (Rayleigh) drag acts near the GCM's lower boundary, but only outside an equatorial latitude band (see SL09 and section 5d).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The drag formulation represents the MHD drag the flow experiences in the interior of the planets.

    “It represents the MHD drag the flow experiences in the interior of the planets.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alternating jets on gas giant planets are either shallow, existing above about 10 bars, or deep, extending to tens of thousands of bars.

    “on one hand, the alternating jets on gas giant planets are 'shallow', existing above 10 bars or so [15-17]; on the other hand, zonal jets are 'deep', extending to tens of thousands of bars [18-22].”

    From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [17]

    The citation is attached to the deep-jet clause, not the shallow-jet clause. The Conclusions (page not provided) say zonal jets should extend to the depth where drag acts, and the General circulation model section places the proposed deep drag at pressures above about 10^5 bar. The paper presents this depth as an inference rather than an observed extent, and it does not give the claimed figure of tens of thousands of bars. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The latitudinal difference in jet and vortex structure is likely driven by the topographical beta effect, which is stronger near the equator and promotes axisymmetric jets, while at higher latitudes the beta effect decreases and the system approaches a rotating plane layer where giant vortices are favored.

    “This is likely driven by the topographical β effect, due to the spherical shell geometry, which is stronger near the equator, promoting strong axisymmetric jets, while, at higher latitudes, the β -effect decreases and the system approaches a rotating plane layer where the formation of giant vortices is favored”

    From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [17]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, J., & Schneider, T.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
67
Issue
11
Pages
3652-3672
ISSN
  • 0022-4928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0469
OpenAlex
W2141312495
Cited by
135
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts
  • AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #42
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX10AQ05G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Keywords
giant planet atmospheres, equatorial jet, convection, Rossby waves, baroclinic eddies, vertical shear, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, global climate models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review