Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets
Open accessAbstract
The giant planet atmospheres exhibit alternating prograde (eastward) and retrograde (westward) jets of different speeds and widths, with an equatorial jet that is prograde on Jupiter and Saturn and retrograde on Uranus and Neptune. The jets are variously thought to be driven by differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere or by intrinsic heat fluxes emanating from the deep interior. However, existing models cannot account for the different flow configurations on the giant planets in an energetically consistent manner. Here a three-dimensional general circulation model is used to show that the different flow configurations can be reproduced by mechanisms universal across the giant planets if differences in their radiative heating and intrinsic heat fluxes are taken into account. Whether the equatorial jet is prograde or retrograde depends on whether the deep intrinsic heat fluxes are strong enough that convection penetrates into the upper troposphere and generates strong equatorial Rossby waves there. Prograde equatorial jets result if convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies generated off the equator is sufficiently weak (Jupiter and Saturn). Retrograde equatorial jets result if either convective Rossby wave generation is weak or absent (Uranus) or low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies is sufficiently strong (Neptune). The different speeds and widths of the off-equatorial jets depend, among other factors, on the differential radiative heating of the atmosphere and the altitude of the jets, which are vertically sheared. The simulations have closed energy and angular momentum balances that are consistent with observations of the giant planets. They exhibit temperature structures closely resembling those observed and make predictions about as yet unobserved aspects of flow and temperature structures.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
A three-dimensional general circulation model reproduces the contrasting giant-planet jet configurations by invoking universal mechanisms: convective Rossby wave generation near the equator and baroclinic eddy generation off the equator. Prograde equatorial jets occur when convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude eddy angular momentum flux divergence is weak; retrograde jets occur when convective Rossby wave generation is weak/absent or baroclinic eddy divergence is strong.
Key findings
- The simulations reproduce equatorial superrotation on Jupiter and Saturn and equatorial subrotation on Uranus and Neptune, with Jupiter’s simulated equatorial jet at ~150 m s⁻¹ and Saturn’s at ~230 m s⁻¹; Neptune’s simulated equatorial jet at the shown level is ~240 m s⁻¹ but weaker than observed.
- The paper attributes Jupiter/Saturn superrotation to strong convective Rossby wave generation near the equator, with rms Rossby wave source ~10⁻¹⁰ s⁻² for Jupiter and Saturn versus ~10⁻¹² s⁻² for Neptune.
- Neptune control simulations show that enhancing the intrinsic heat flux to Saturn’s 2.01 W m⁻² (from Neptune’s 0.433 W m⁻²) or suppressing baroclinic eddy generation by uniform insolation both produce equatorial superrotation.
- Simulated equator-to-pole brightness temperature contrasts are 10 K for Jupiter, 7 K for Saturn, 8 K for Uranus, and 2 K for Neptune, broadly consistent with observations; eddy-to-mean kinetic energy conversion rates are 0.09 and 0.026 W m⁻² for Jupiter and Saturn, about 0.6% of total atmospheric energy uptake.
Methods
- The study uses a dry ideal-gas hydrostatic primitive-equation GCM in a thin spherical shell, with T85–T213 horizontal spectral resolution and 30 or 40 vertical levels; the lower boundary is at 3 bar, insolation is perpetual equinox without a diurnal cycle, and observed intrinsic heat fluxes are imposed (5.70, 2.01, 0.04, and 0.43 W m⁻² for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune).
- Linear Rayleigh drag acts near the lower boundary outside an equatorial no-drag region extending to 33° latitude, representing deep MHD drag; simulations were spun up from an isothermal rest state for at least 40,000 Earth days, and statistics are averaged over 1500 days.
- Control simulations vary the intrinsic heat flux, suppress baroclinic instability by imposing uniform insolation, and alter the drag formulation to test the proposed jet-formation mechanisms.
Limitations
- The paper states that current computational resources prevent simulating deep giant-planet flows, so the model focuses on upper atmospheres with an artificial lower boundary; the drag formulation is poorly constrained by data or physics, and the convection scheme does not transport momentum (zero convective Prandtl number), an idealization that may affect results.
- The paper also states that it ignores seasonal cycles and obliquity effects on insolation, and that solar optical properties of giant-planet atmospheres are not well constrained, so unconstrained parameters are set equal to Jupiter’s to minimize inter-simulation differences.
- Evident from the text: the thin-shell domain, idealized gray radiative transfer, and imposed uniform intrinsic heat flux are simplifications; the authors argue these do not affect the qualitative jet-formation mechanisms but may affect quantitative aspects such as jet strength and vertical shear.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 88 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The Uranus and Neptune simulations exhibit a single off-equatorial jet in each hemisphere.
“The Uranus and Neptune simulations exhibit a single off-equatorial jet in each hemisphere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The simulations exhibit temperature structures closely resembling those observed.
“They exhibit temperature structures closely resembling those observed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The simulations reproduce large-scale features of the observed flows in the upper atmosphere.
“The simulations reproduce large-scale features of the observed flows in the upper atmosphere (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the equatorial region in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, the waves are organized into large wave packets.
“In the equatorial region in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, the waves are organized into large wave packets (Fig. 3, left column).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The prograde equatorial jets in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations strengthen with depth.
“The prograde equatorial jets in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations strengthen with depth (Fig. 5, left column).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingcitation
The tropopause in all simulations lies near 0.1 bar, as observed.
“The tropopause, recognizable as the level at which the vertical temperature lapse rate changes sign, in all simulations lies near 0.1 bar, likewise as observed (Simon-Miller -4.et al. 2006;Fletcher et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
The coherent polar vortices in the simulations are contained in the polar cap bounded by the highest-latitude prograde jet.
“The coherent polar vortices in our simulations are contained in the polar cap bounded by the highestlatitude prograde jet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In the Jupiter simulation, the equator-to-pole contrast in the brightness temperature of thermal radiation is 10 K, which is similar to, albeit larger than, the observed brightness temperature contrast or the observed temperature contrast near the emission level.
“In the Jupiter simulation, the equator-to-pole contrast in the brightness temperature of thermal radiation is 10 K, which is similar to, albeit larger than, the observed brightness temperature contrast or the observed temperature contrast near the emission level (Ingersoll et al. 1976;Ingersoll 1990;Ingersoll et al. 2004;Simon-Miller et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Animations of the flow fields show that the wave packets exhibit westward group propagation, as expected for long equatorial Rossby waves.
“Animations of the flow fields (available online at http://www.gps.caltech.edu/;tapio/pubs.html)show that the wave packets exhibit westward group propagation, as expected for long equatorial Rossby waves (Matsuno 1966;Gill 1982, chapter 11).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Matsuno 1966 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gill 1982
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In high latitudes in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, very large coherent vortices (10 degrees latitude by 20 degrees longitude) form spontaneously.
“In high latitudes in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, very large coherent vortices (108 latitude 3 208 longitude) form spontaneously (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
A similar equatorial temperature minimum is seen in observations of Jupiter and Saturn.
“A similar equatorial temperature minimum is seen in observations of Jupiter and Saturn (Simon-Miller et al. 2006;Fletcher et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Eddy generation preferentially occurs in the troposphere in the baroclinically more unstable prograde jets with enhanced temperature gradients and enhanced prograde vertical shear.
“Eddy generation preferentially occurs in the troposphere in the baroclinically more unstable prograde jets with enhanced temperature gradients and enhanced prograde vertical shear (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Consistent with a baroclinic eddy generation mechanism, off-equatorial eddy angular momentum fluxes and jets disappear in a Jupiter control simulation in which baroclinic instability is suppressed by imposing insolation uniformly at the top of the atmosphere.
“Consistent with a baroclinic eddy generation mechanism, off-equatorial eddy angular momentum fluxes and jets disappear in a Jupiter control simulation in which baroclinic instability is suppressed by imposing insolation uniformly at the top of the atmosphere (SL09).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SL09
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
Eddy generation results in angular momentum transport from retrograde into prograde tropospheric jets.
“It results in angular momentum transport from retrograde into prograde tropospheric jets (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The conversion rate of eddy to mean flow kinetic energy is of order 10^-5 W m^-3 in the upper tropospheres in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, as observed.
“The conversion rate of eddy to mean flow kinetic energy is of order 10 25 W m 23 in the upper tropospheres in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations-as observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Equatorial Rossby waves, organized into large-scale wave packets, are recognizable in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations in Fig. 3.
“Equatorial Rossby waves, organized into large-scale wave packets, are recognizable in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations in Fig. 3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The eddy angular momentum flux divergence at the stratospheric jet cores is much weaker than that at the tropospheric jet cores in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.
“Indeed, the eddy angular momentum flux divergence at the stratospheric jet cores is much weaker than that at the tropospheric jet cores in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Jupiter simulation, the energy-containing zonal wavenumber is approximately 10, corresponding to the wavenumber of the wave packet envelope.
“In the Jupiter simulation, the energycontaining zonal wavenumber is ;10, corresponding to the wavenumber of the wave packet envelope.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The prograde off-equatorial jets disappear with the suppression of baroclinicity.
“The prograde off-equatorial jets disappear with the suppression of baroclinicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In the Neptune simulation, the intrinsic heat flux is strong enough that convection penetrates into the upper troposphere.
“In the Neptune simulation, the intrinsic heat flux is strong enough that convection penetrates into the upper troposphere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The width of the equatorial no-drag region does not primarily control the strength or width of the equatorial jet.
“However, the width of the equatorial no-drag region does not primarily control the strength or width of the equatorial jet, as evidenced by the relatively moderate changes in the flow in low latitudes in response to the factor 2 change in the width of the no-drag region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A control simulation in which baroclinic eddy generation was suppressed by imposing insolation uniformly at the top of the atmosphere (but keeping the global mean fixed) also exhibits equatorial superrotation.
“Conversely, a control simulation in which baroclinic eddy generation was suppressed by imposing insolation uniformly at the top of the atmosphere (but keeping the global mean fixed) FIG. 9. Mean flow fields in the latitude-pressure plane in Jupiter simulations with different drag formulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The strength and width of off-equatorial jets depend on the drag coefficient.
“That the strength and width of off-equatorial jets depend on the drag coefficient is directly illustrated by simulations in which we increased the off-equatorial drag coefficient further [Fig.9b, k 0 5 1/(10 days)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A control simulation with Neptune's physical parameters but in which the convective Rossby wave source was enhanced by enhancing the intrinsic heat flux-setting it to Saturn's 2.01 W m^-2 in place of Neptune's 0.433 W m^-2-exhibits equatorial superrotation.
“Indeed, a control simulation with Neptune's physical parameters but in which the convective Rossby wave source was enhanced by enhancing the intrinsic heat flux-setting it to Saturn's 2.01 W m 22 in place of Neptune's 0.433 W m 22 -exhibits equatorial superrotation (Fig. 8, left column).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Such an off-equatorial tropospheric layer with mean mass flux along M_V surfaces is clearly seen in our simulations, where M_V surfaces are vertical.
“As in Earth's atmosphere, such an off-equatorial tropospheric layer with mean mass flux along M V surfaces is clearly seen in our simulations, where M V surfaces are vertical (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The energy dissipated by the subgrid-scale hyperdiffusion amounts to less than 1% of the total energy uptake of the atmosphere in all simulations.
“However, it amounts to less than 1% of the total energy uptake of the atmosphere in all simulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Where exactly the MHD drag acts and how strong it is does not affect the essence of our results.
“However, as we have shown in section 4d, where exactly the MHD drag acts and how strong it is does not affect the essence of our results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The vertically integrated Rayleigh drag on the zonal flow approximately balances the vertically integrated total (mean plus eddy) angular momentum flux convergence.
“The vertically integrated Rayleigh drag on the zonal flow approximately balances the vertically integrated total (mean plus eddy) angular momentum flux convergence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The simulations reproduce many large-scale features of the observed flows, such as equatorial superrotation on Jupiter and Saturn and equatorial subrotation on Uranus and Neptune.
“The simulations reproduce many large-scale features of the observed flows, such as equatorial superrotation on Jupiter and Saturn and equatorial subrotation on Uranus and Neptune.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The equatorial Rossby waves responsible for the generation of the equatorial superrotation are recognizable in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.
“The equatorial Rossby waves (organized into large wave packets) that are responsible for the generation of the equatorial superrotation are recognizable in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The chosen solar optical properties (t_s0 = 3.0 at p0 = 3.0 bar) give a solar radiative flux qualitatively consistent with Galileo probe measurements in Jupiter.
“This gives a solar radiative flux qualitatively consistent with Galileo probe measurements in Jupiter (Sromovsky et al. 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sromovsky et al. 1998 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Variations in brightness temperature gradients off the equator may be weaker in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations than they are in observations, at least at some wavelengths.
“Variations in brightness temperature gradients off the equator may be weaker in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations than they are in observations, at least at some wavelengths(Ingersoll 1990; Ingersoll et al. 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ingersoll 1990 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ingersoll et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In our Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune simulations, a state with nearly convectively neutral interior tropospheres is attained outside a few degrees of the equator.
“In our Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune simulations, such a state with nearly convectively neutral interior tropospheres is indeed attained outside a few degrees of the equator (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The convective generation of Rossby waves on which the paper focuses occurs in the equatorial upper troposphere, where the vertical shear is relatively small.
“However, the convective generation of Rossby waves on which we focus occurs in the equatorial upper troposphere, where the vertical shear is relatively small (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Coherent vortices are clearly seen in the Jupiter and Uranus simulations.
“Coherent vortices are clearly seen in the Jupiter and Uranus simulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We have presented the first simulations of all four giant planets with closed energy and angular momentum balances that are consistent with observations.
“We have presented the first simulations of all four giant planets with closed energy and angular momentum balances that are consistent with observations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A three-dimensional general circulation model can reproduce the different flow configurations on the giant planets by mechanisms universal across the giant planets if differences in their radiative heating and intrinsic heat fluxes are taken into account.
“Here a three-dimensional general circulation model is used to show that the different flow configurations can be reproduced by mechanisms universal across the giant planets if differences in their radiative heating and intrinsic heat fluxes are taken into account.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Existing models cannot account for the different flow configurations on the giant planets in an energetically consistent manner.
“However, existing models cannot account for the different flow configurations on the giant planets in an energetically consistent manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Whether the equatorial jet is prograde or retrograde depends on whether the deep intrinsic heat fluxes are strong enough that convection penetrates into the upper troposphere and generates strong equatorial Rossby waves there.
“Whether the equatorial jet is prograde or retrograde depends on whether the deep intrinsic heat fluxes are strong enough that convection penetrates into the upper troposphere and generates strong equatorial Rossby waves there.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The different speeds and widths of the off-equatorial jets depend, among other factors, on the differential radiative heating of the atmosphere and the altitude of the jets, which are vertically sheared.
“The different speeds and widths of the off-equatorial jets depend, among other factors, on the differential radiative heating of the atmosphere and the altitude of the jets, which are vertically sheared.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Giant planet atmospheres exhibit alternating prograde and retrograde jets of different speeds and widths.
“The giant planet atmospheres exhibit alternating prograde (eastward) and retrograde (westward) jets of different speeds and widths”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
With current computational resources, it is not feasible to simulate flows deep in giant planet atmospheres while at the same time resolving the energy-containing eddies in the upper atmospheres.
“With current computational resources, it is not feasible to simulate flows deep in giant planet atmospheres, where radiative relaxation times are measured in centuries and millennia, while at the same time resolving the energy-containing eddies in the upper atmospheres.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The limited thermodynamic efficiency of atmospheres allows only a fraction of the total atmospheric energy uptake to be used to generate eddy kinetic energy.
“But the limited thermodynamic efficiency of atmospheres allows only a fraction of the total atmospheric energy uptake to be used to generate eddy kinetic energy (Lorenz 1955;Peixoto and Oort 1992).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lorenz 1955 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Peixoto and Oort 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Eddy angular momentum fluxes inferred from tracking cloud features in Jupiter's and Saturn's upper tropospheres indicate that the mean conversion rate from eddy to mean-flow kinetic energy is of order 10^-5 W m^-3.
“But the eddy angular momentum fluxes inferred from tracking cloud features in Jupiter's and Saturn's upper tropospheres indicate that the mean conversion rate from eddy to mean-flow kinetic energy is of order 10 25 W m 23 (Ingersoll et al. 1981;Salyk et al. 2006;Del Genio et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisenone given
Multiple off-equatorial jets form as a result of baroclinic instability owing to the differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere.
“Multiple off-equatorial jets, by contrast, form as a result of baroclinic instability owing to the differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
None of these models can account for the existence of equatorial superrotation on Jupiter and Saturn and equatorial subrotation on Uranus and Neptune with radiative heating, intrinsic heat fluxes, and other physical parameters consistent with observations.
“However, none of these models can account for the existence of equatorial superrotation on Jupiter and Saturn and equatorial subrotation on Uranus and Neptune with radiative heating, intrinsic heat fluxes, and other physical parameters consistent with observations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Despite decades of study, it has remained obscure how the different flow configurations of the giant planets come about.
“Despite decades of study with a variety of flow models, it has remained obscure how these different flow configurations come about (Vasavada and Showman 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vasavada and Showman 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The simulations have closed energy and angular momentum balances that are consistent with observations of the giant planets.
“The simulations have closed energy and angular momentum balances that are consistent with observations of the giant planets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The meridional eddy fluxes of angular momentum per unit volume in deep-flow models have a barotropic structure, extending roughly along cylinders concentric with the planet's spin axis over the entire depth of the fluid, typically to pressures of order 10^6 bar.
“Their meridional eddy fluxes of angular momentum per unit volume (taking density variations into account) have a barotropic structure: they extend roughly along cylinders concentric with the planet's spin axis over the entire depth of the fluid, typically to pressures of order 10 6 bar (e.g., Kaspi et al. 2009, their Fig.10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kaspi et al. 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The changing magnitude of the vorticity gradients between zonal velocity maxima and minima gives rise to a staircase pattern of absolute vorticity and potential vorticity as a function of latitude.
“The changing magnitude of the vorticity gradients between zonal velocity maxima and minima gives rise to a staircase pattern of absolute vorticity and potential vorticity as a function of latitude (McIntyre 1982;Dritschel and McIntyre 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McIntyre 1982 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dritschel and McIntyre 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Meridional enthalpy transport in all simulations substantially reduces the much greater radiative-convective equilibrium temperature contrasts near the emission levels.
“That is, meridional enthalpy transport in all simulations substantially reduces the (much greater) radiativeconvective equilibrium temperature contrasts near the emission levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Since the planetary vorticity gradient vanishes at the poles, formation of coherent vortices in high latitudes may require less vorticity mixing in the environment than it does at lower latitudes.
“Since the planetary vorticity gradient vanishes at the poles, formation of coherent vortices in high latitudes may require less vorticity mixing in the environment than it does at lower latitudes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
It does not appear necessary to invoke meridional mixing deep in the atmosphere to account for the smallness of the observed brightness temperature contrasts.
“It does not appear necessary to invoke meridional mixing deep in the atmosphere to account for the smallness of the observed brightness temperature contrasts (cf.Ingersoll 1976;Ingersoll and Porco 1978).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ingersoll 1976
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ingersoll and Porco 1978
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
In the Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune simulations, the atmosphere is close to statically neutrally stratified below the statically stable layer near the tropopause because of vigorous convection driven by intrinsic heat fluxes.
“In the Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune simulations, the atmosphere is close to statically neutrally stratified below the statically stable layer near the tropopause because of vigorous convection driven by intrinsic heat fluxes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
In the Uranus simulation, the entire atmosphere is stably stratified (or close to it) because convection and intrinsic heat fluxes are weak.
“In the Uranus simulation, the entire atmosphere is stably stratified (or close to it) because convection and intrinsic heat fluxes are weak (Fig. 5, colors in right column).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Hence, the meridional potential temperature distribution at lower levels is the same as that near the top of the neutrally stratified layer, except near the equator where the atmosphere has a weak positive static stability.
“Hence, the meridional potential temperature distribution at lower levels is the same as that near the top of the neutrally stratified layer, except near the equator where the atmosphere has a weak positive static stability (Fig. 6b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Eddies in rapidly rotating atmospheres generally transport angular momentum from their dissipation (breaking) region into their generation region.
“Eddies in rapidly rotating atmospheres generally transport angular momentum from their dissipation (breaking) region into their generation region (Held 1975;Andrews andMcIntyre 1976, 1978;Rhines 1994;Held 2000;Vallis 2006, chapter 12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
If eddies are preferentially generated in prograde jets, they lead to angular momentum transport from retrograde into prograde jets, which can maintain the jets against dissipation.
“If they are preferentially generated in prograde jets, they lead to angular momentum transport from retrograde into prograde jets, which can maintain the jets against dissipation (e.g., Vallis 2006;O'Gorman and Schneider 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Vallis 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites O'Gorman and Schneider 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
This implies that meridional temperature gradients off the equator increase with pressure, as temperature and potential temperature are related by T = theta (p/p0)^k.
“But this implies that meridional temperature gradients off the equator increase with pressure, as temperature T and potential temperature u are related by T 5 u(p/p 0 ) k , where p is pressure and p 0 a constant reference pressure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because the atmosphere is close to statically neutrally stratified below the upper troposphere, entropy (potential temperature) there is constant in the vertical.
“Because the atmosphere is close to statically neutrally stratified below the upper troposphere, entropy (potential temperature) there is constant in the vertical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Such angular momentum transport from retrograde into prograde jets has indeed been observed on Jupiter and Saturn.
“Such angular momentum transport from retrograde into prograde jets has indeed been observed on Jupiter and Saturn (Ingersoll et al. 1981;Salyk et al. 2006;Del Genio et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
This angular momentum transport maintains the off-equatorial tropospheric jets in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations against dissipation at depth.
“This angular momentum transport maintains the off-equatorial tropospheric jets in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations against dissipation at depth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The off-equatorial jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations appear broader because only the longest waves generated at lower levels are able to reach the stratosphere.
“They appear to be broader because only the longest waves generated at lower levels are able to reach the stratosphere (Charney and Drazin 1961).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Charney and Drazin 1961
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The thermal structure and vertical shear do not exhibit smaller-scale variations because smaller-scale eddy transports of angular momentum and heat in the stratosphere are weak.
“The latter do not exhibit smaller-scale variations because smaller-scale eddy transports of angular momentum and heat in the stratosphere are weak.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The retrograde tilt of the waves' phase lines away from the equator, clearly seen in the Jupiter simulation, indicates that they transport angular momentum toward the equator.
“The retrograde tilt of the waves' phase lines away from the equator, clearly seen in the Jupiter simulation (Fig. 3), indicates that they transport angular momentum toward the equator (cf.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peixoto and Oort 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The dominant balance in the thermodynamic equation is the weak temperature gradient (WTG) balance.
“That is, the dominant balance in the thermodynamic equation is the weak temperature gradient (WTG) balance (Sobel et al. 2001”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sobel et al. 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Convective Rossby wave generation near the equator is the key process responsible for superrotation in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.
“Convective Rossby wave generation near the equator is the key process responsible for superrotation in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The jets are primarily a manifestation of the thermal structure and of the vertical shear of the zonal flow implied by it.
“The jets are primarily a manifestation of the thermal structure and of the vertical shear of the zonal flow implied by it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The flow configurations in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations differ qualitatively from those in the Uranus and Neptune simulations because the relative strengths of baroclinic eddy generation away from the equator and convective Rossby wave generation near the equator differ.
“The flow configurations in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations differ qualitatively from those in the Uranus and Neptune simulations because the relative strengths of baroclinic eddy generation away from the equator and convective Rossby wave generation near the equator differ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Convective Rossby wave generation is what causes the superrotating equatorial jets on Jupiter and Saturn.
“Therefore, we suggest that convective Rossby wave generation is what causes the superrotating equatorial jets on Jupiter and Saturn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The equatorial jet on Saturn may be stronger and wider than that on Jupiter because the gravity wave speed is larger.
“That is, the equatorial jet on Saturn may be stronger and wider than that on Jupiter because the gravity wave speed is larger.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
When convective Rossby wave generation produces equatorial superrotation, it produces a jet whose halfwidth L_s is similar to the scale of equatorial Rossby waves: the equatorial Rossby radius L_b = sqrt(c/beta).
“When convective Rossby wave generation produces equatorial superrotation, it produces a jet whose halfwidth L s is similar to the scale of equatorial Rossby waves: the equatorial Rossby radius L b 5 ffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi c/b p , with gravity wave speed c and planetary vorticity gradient b.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
To the extent that the vorticity-mixing bound is attained, the jet speed increases quadratically with the jet width.
“To the extent that this bound is attained (at the level of maximum equatorial jet speed), the jet speed increases quadratically with the jet width.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Uranus and Neptune exhibit equatorial subrotation because baroclinic eddy generation away from the equator is strong compared with convective Rossby wave generation near the equator.
“We suggest, then, that Uranus and Neptune exhibit equatorial subrotation because baroclinic eddy generation away from the equator is strong compared with convective Rossby wave generation near the equator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune have sufficiently strong intrinsic heat fluxes to lead to convection in their tropospheres.
“Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune have sufficiently strong intrinsic heat fluxes to lead to convection in their tropospheres (Guillot et al. 2004;Guillot 2005), as in our simulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Guillot et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Guillot 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Better fits to observations can be obtained if different drag formulations are used for the different giant planets.
“The simulations with different drag formulations show that better fits to observations can be obtained if different drag formulations are used for the different giant planets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Insofar as the eddy angular momentum fluxes in the upper atmosphere control the dissipation at depth, one may speak of 'downward control' of the mean meridional circulation and zonal flow at depth.
“Insofar as the eddy angular momentum fluxes in the upper atmosphere control the dissipation at depth, one may speak of ''downward control'' of the mean meridional circulation and zonal flow at depth (Haynes et al. 1991).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haynes et al. 1991 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
In a statistically steady state, any mean mass flux across an M_V surface associated with eddy angular momentum flux divergences in the upper troposphere must be balanced by an equal and opposite mean mass flux across the same M_V surface somewhere else, to obtain closed circulation cells.
“In a statistically steady state, any mean mass flux across an M V surface associated with eddy angular momentum flux divergences in the upper troposphere must be balanced by an equal and opposite mean mass flux across the same M V surface somewhere else, to obtain closed circulation cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Under conditions of small convective Rossby number and negligible viscous momentum dissipation and thermal diffusion, convective plumes are columns aligned with M_V surfaces because rapid rotation inhibits motion perpendicular to M_V surfaces in the absence of viscous or other stresses.
“Under these circumstances, convective plumes are columns aligned with M V surfaces because, as above, rapid rotation inhibits motion perpendicular to M V surfaces in the absence of viscous or other stresses (e.g., Busse 1976Busse , 1978;;Kaspi et al. 2009;Jones et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Away from the equator, the Rossby number is generally small in the tropospheres of the giant planets if zonal-flow velocities at depth do not substantially exceed those observed on Jupiter and Saturn, or those seen in the tropospheres of Uranus and Neptune in our simulations.
“Away from the equator, the Rossby number is generally small in the tropospheres of the giant planets if zonal-flow velocities at depth do not substantially exceed those observed on Jupiter and Saturn, or those seen in the tropospheres of Uranus and Neptune in our simulations (see SL09 and footnote 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SL09
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Taking a density-weighted integral of the angular momentum balance (8) along M_V surfaces and using mass conservation shows that any net divergence or convergence of eddy angular momentum fluxes on an M_V surface must be balanced by a zonal drag force on the same M_V surface.
“Taking a density-weighted integral of the angular momentum balance (8) along M V surfaces and using mass conservation shows that any net divergence or convergence of eddy angular momentum fluxes on an M V surface must be balanced by a zonal drag force on the same M V surface,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In any atmosphere, regardless of its constitutional law, the balance of angular momentum around the planet's spin axis can be written as equation (4).
“In any atmosphere, regardless of its constitutional law, the balance of angular momentum around the planet's spin axis can be written as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peixoto and Oort 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
In a statistically steady state, upon averaging temporally and zonally, the angular momentum balance becomes equation (5).
“In a statistically steady state, upon averaging temporally and zonally (azimuthally), the angular momentum balance becomes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If eddy angular momentum flux convergence occurs in the upper troposphere in prograde jets, and divergence in retrograde jets, and if this is the dominant eddy angular momentum flux convergence/divergence on an M_V surface, the mean zonal flow where the drag acts must be of the same sign as the flow in the upper troposphere on the same M_V surface.
“To the extent that the drag force locally retards the mean zonal flow, it follows that, if eddy angular momentum flux convergence occurs in the upper troposphere in prograde jets, and divergence in retrograde jets, and if this is the dominant eddy angular momentum flux convergence/ divergence on an M V surface, the mean zonal flow where the drag acts must be of the same sign as the flow in the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Zonal jets must extend to wherever drag acts, irrespective of its depth, even if the eddy angular momentum fluxes are confined to the upper troposphere.
“That is, zonal jets must extend to wherever drag acts, irrespective of its depth, even if the eddy angular momentum fluxes are confined to the upper troposphere”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites O'Gorman and Schneider (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Convective momentum fluxes do not alter the results substantially.
“So one may expect that convective momentum fluxes do not alter our results substantially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The convection scheme assumes a convective Prandtl number of zero (does not transport momentum).
- Study design and conductown data
The simulated flows appeared not to be sensitive to variations of the convective relaxation time up to a factor of 2 smaller and a factor of 4 larger.
“We experimented with convective relaxation times up to a factor of 2 smaller and a factor of 4 larger in preliminary simulations; the simulated flows appeared not to be sensitive to such variations of the relaxation time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Simulations of only thin atmospheric shells can have closed energy and angular momentum balances that are physically plausible and consistent with observations of the giant planets.
“The preceding discussion shows that simulations of only thin atmospheric shells can have closed energy and angular momentum balances that are physically plausible and consistent with observations of the giant planets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Drag at depth closes the balances in a physically plausible manner (e.g., without assuming excessive viscous stresses in the planetary interior).
“Drag at depth closes the balances in a physically plausible manner (e.g., without assuming excessive viscous stresses in the planetary interior).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The convection scheme represents an idealization that may affect the results.
“Prandtl numbers for dry convection are usually greater than zero, so this represents an idealization, which may affect our results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Prandtl numbers for dry convection are usually greater than zero.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The convection scheme assumes a convective Prandtl number of zero (does not transport momentum).
- Interpretationreasoning
It is very unlikely that the interiors of the giant planets are isentropic.
“It hence is very unlikely that the interiors of the giant planets are isentropic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Considerations of the angular momentum balance have shown that the zonal jets should extend-generally with shear-to the depth where drag acts on them and balances the angular momentum flux divergences and convergences in the upper troposphere.
“However, considerations of the angular momentum balance have shown that the zonal jets should extend-generally with shear-to the depth where drag acts on them and balances the angular momentum flux divergences and convergences in the upper troposphere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A model domain of sufficient depth to take into account the absorption of solar radiation in the upper atmosphere is essential to obtain baroclinic flows with an energy balance that is consistent with observations.
“A model domain of sufficient depth to take into account the absorption of solar radiation in the upper atmosphere is essential to obtain baroclinic flows with an energy balance that is consistent with observations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Resolving baroclinic eddy fluxes of angular momentum in the upper atmosphere is essential to obtain an angular momentum balance that is consistent with observations.
“Resolving baroclinic eddy fluxes of angular momentum in the upper atmosphere is essential to obtain an angular momentum balance that is consistent with observations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Outside a few degrees latitude of the equator, the upper-tropospheric dynamics are linked to the flow and any drag at depth along cylindrical M_V surfaces.
“Outside a few degrees latitude of the equator, the upper-tropospheric dynamics are linked to the flow and any drag at depth along cylindrical M V surfaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Coupling of the flow at depths at which the atmosphere is electrically conducting to the magnetic field is a plausible mechanism that generates MHD drag.
“On the other hand, coupling of the flow at depths at which the atmosphere is electrically conducting to the magnetic field is a plausible mechanism that generates MHD drag (Liu et al. 2008; see also the appendix).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al. 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The jet formation mechanisms discussed in the paper are not affected by the inability to resolve the flow and drag at depth.
“Though quantitative aspects (e.g., jet strength and shear) may be affected by our inability to resolve the flow and drag at depth, the jet formation mechanisms that we discussed are not affected by it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Drag acts on the zonal flow at depth.
“That drag acts on the zonal flow at depth is suggested by observations of eddy angular momentum fluxes on Jupiter and Saturn, and a plausible MHD drag mechanism exists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Given that significant eddy angular momentum flux divergences in the upper tropospheres have been observed at least on Jupiter and Saturn, it is very unlikely that the zonal drag, which depends on the zonal flow, can balance the net eddy angular momentum flux divergence on an M_V surface without any shear of the zonal flow in the direction of the spin axis.
“Given that significant eddy angular momentum flux divergences in the upper tropospheres have been observed at least on Jupiter and Saturn, it is very unlikely that the zonal drag, which depends on the zonal flow, can balance the net eddy angular momentum flux divergence on an M V surface without any shear of the zonal flow in the direction of the spin axis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This MHD drag can close the angular momentum balance integrated over M_V surfaces.
“This MHD drag can close the angular momentum balance integrated over M V surfaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Outside the tangent cylinder that just grazes the region of substantial MHD drag in the equatorial plane, the upper-tropospheric flow cannot be linked to drag at depth.
“Therefore, outside the tangent cylinder that just grazes the region of substantial MHD drag in the equatorial plane, the upper-tropospheric flow cannot be linked to drag at depth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The depth of the nearly inviscid interior layer in which there are no significant heat sources and where D~0 and S~0 is immaterial for the mechanisms we discussed.
“However, the depth of the nearly inviscid interior layer in which there are no significant heat sources and where D ' 0 and S ' 0 is immaterial for the mechanisms we discussed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The same arguments may also explain the formation of prograde equatorial jets in Scott and Polvani's (2008) simulations with an essentially frictionless shallow-water model.
“The same arguments may also explain the formation of prograde equatorial jets inScott and Polvani's (2008) simulations with an essentially frictionless shallow-water model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scott and Polvani's (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The WTG approximation holds within ~4° of the equator in Jupiter's upper troposphere.
“In SL09, we showed that the WTG approximation holds within ;48 of the equator in Jupiter's upper troposphere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SL09
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
For Uranus' and Neptune's upper tropospheres, with the tropospheric velocity scales from the simulations, the WTG approximation holds within ~5° of the equator.
“For Uranus' and Neptune's upper tropospheres, no flow data are available, but with the tropospheric velocity scales from our simulations, the WTG approximation holds within ;58 of the equator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Analogous scale analysis suggests the WTG approximation holds within ~7° of the equator in Saturn's upper troposphere.
“Analogous scale analysis suggests the WTG approximation holds within ;78 of the equator in Saturn's upper troposphere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 80
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMeridional gradients of both absolute vorticity and quasigeostrophic potential vorticity at the levels shown in Fig. 1 are small near zonal velocity minima and are reversed near some of them.
“Indeed, meridional gradients of both absolute vorticity and quasigeostrophic potential vorticity at the levels at which the zonal velocities are shown in Fig. 1 are small near zonal velocity minima and are reversed near some of them (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Jupiter and Saturn simulations exhibit equatorial superrotation, and the Uranus and Neptune simulations exhibit equatorial subrotation.
“The Jupiter and Saturn simulations exhibit equatorial superrotation, the Uranus and Neptune simulations equatorial subrotation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe equatorial jet in the Saturn simulation is stronger (about 230 m/s) and slightly wider than that in the Jupiter simulation, but it is weaker and narrower than the observed jet at a corresponding level on Saturn.
“The equatorial jet in the Saturn simulation is stronger (;230 m s 21 ) and slightly wider than that in the Jupiter simulation, but it is weaker and narrower than the observed jet at a corresponding level on Saturn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe overall structure of the jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations is roughly consistent with observations, but the equatorial jet in the Neptune simulation at the level shown (about 240 m/s) is considerably weaker than that observed.
“The overall structure of the jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations is roughly consistent with observations, but the equatorial jet in the Neptune simulation at the level shown (;240 m s 21 ) is considerably weaker than that observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe equatorial jet in the Jupiter simulation has similar strength (about 150 m/s) and width as the observed jet.
“The equatorial jet in the Jupiter simulation has similar strength (;150 m s 21 ) and width as the observed jet.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn general, the prograde jets (or zonal velocity maxima) are sharper than the retrograde jets (or zonal velocity minima), consistent with the zonal velocity maxima being barotropically more stable.
“In general, the prograde jets (or zonal velocity maxima) are sharper than the retrograde jets (or zonal velocity minima), consistent with the zonal velocity maxima being barotropically more stable (Rhines 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rhines 1994 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Jupiter and Saturn simulations exhibit alternating off-equatorial jets; they are broader than the observed jets but of similar strength.
“The Jupiter and Saturn simulations exhibit alternating offequatorial jets; they are broader than the observed jets but of similar strength.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn the Saturn simulation, the equator-to-pole brightness temperature contrast is 7 K, consistent with observations.
“In the Saturn simulation, the equator-topole brightness temperature contrast is 7 K, consistent with observations (Ingersoll 1990;Fletcher et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Saturn simulation, the prograde polar jet at 68 degrees N exhibits a wavenumber-8 or -9 undulation, with a zonal phase velocity of -24 m/s.
“In the Saturn simulation, for example, the prograde polar jet at 688N exhibits a wavenumber-8 or -9 undulation (Fig. 4), with a zonal phase velocity of 224 m s 21 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn the equatorial upper troposphere in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, where the prograde jets strengthen with depth, temperatures decrease equatorward and have a minimum at the equator.
“Therefore, in the equatorial upper troposphere in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, where the prograde jets strengthen with depth, temperatures decrease equatorward and have a minimum at the equator (Fig. 5, contours in right column).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn the Uranus and Neptune simulations, the equator-to-pole brightness temperature contrasts are 8 and 2 K, respectively, consistent with observations.
“In the Uranus and Neptune simulations, the equator-to-pole brightness temperature contrasts are 8 and 2 K, respectively, consistent with observations (Ingersoll 1990).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ingersoll 1990 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAway from the equator, prograde jets generally weaken with depth and retrograde jets strengthen slightly or do not vary much with depth.
“Away from the equator, prograde jets generally weaken with depth and retrograde jets strengthen slightly or do not vary much with depth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn the Jupiter simulation with an atmosphere of 3-bar thickness, the radiative time scale is about 10 Earth years; it is about 50 Earth years in the Saturn simulation.
“In the Jupiter simulation with an atmosphere of 3-bar thickness, the radiative time scale is ;10 Earth years; it is ;50 Earth years in the Saturn simulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe large coherent vortices extend all the way to the bottom of the domain, with the magnitude of the vorticity decreasing weakly with depth: the peak vorticity at the bottom of the domain is about 80% of its maximum value in the column.
“They extend all the way to the bottom of the domain, with the magnitude of the vorticity decreasing weakly with depth: the peak vorticity at the bottom of the domain is about 80% of its maximum value in the column.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe corresponding vertical shear of the zonal flow, about 1-2 x 10^-3 s^-1, is similar to that measured by the Galileo probe on Jupiter between 0.7 and 4 bar and to that inferred from Cassini data for Saturn between 0.05 and 0.8 bar.
“The corresponding vertical shear of the zonal flow, ;1-2 3 10 23 s 21 , is similar to that measured by the Galileo probe on Jupiter between 0.7 and 4 bar (Atkinson et al. 1998) and to that inferred from Cassini data for Saturn between 0.05 and 0.8 bar (Sanchez-Lavega et al. 2007; see also the zonal-flow observations at different levels in Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe large coherent vortices are cyclonic, with typical vorticities of magnitude about 2 x 10^-5 s^-1.
“The large coherent vortices are cyclonic, with typical vorticities of magnitude ;2 3 10 25 s 21 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe retrograde equatorial jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations are strongest in the stratosphere and weaken with depth, consistent with inferences drawn from gravity measurements with the Voyager 2 spacecraft.
“The retrograde equatorial jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations are strongest in the stratosphere and weaken with depth, consistent with inferences drawn from gravity measurements with the Voyager 2 spacecraft (Hubbard et al. 1991).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hubbard et al. 1991 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe jets are evident not only in long-term averages but also in instantaneous flow fields.
“The jets are evident not only in long-term averages but also in instantaneous flow fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe large coherent vortices are advected by the flow in their environment and have a local temperature minimum at the center (about 10 K lower temperature than the environment).
“They are advected by the flow in their environment and have a local temperature minimum at the center (;10 K lower temperature than the environment).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the global mean, the conversion rates are 0.09 and 0.026 W m^-2 in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, respectively, implying that the conversion rate in either simulation is about 0.6% of the total energy uptake of the atmosphere.
“In the global mean, the conversion rates are 0.09 and 0.026 W m 22 in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, respectively, implying that the conversion rate in either simulation is about 0.6% of the total energy uptake of the atmosphere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe off-equatorial jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations are situated in the stratosphere and are broader than those in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.
“The off-equatorial jets in the Uranus and Neptune simulations are situated in the stratosphere and are broader than those in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThis angular momentum transport has a baroclinic structure and, in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, is in structure and magnitude consistent with observations.
“It has a baroclinic structure and, in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, is in structure and magnitude consistent with observations (cf.Ingersoll et al. 1981;Salyk et al. 2006;Del Genio et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe eddy angular momentum flux divergence at the stratospheric jet cores is not even of a consistent sign at all times but exhibits considerable low-frequency variability.
“It is not even of a consistent sign at all times but exhibits considerable low-frequency variability, as indicated by the differences between the statistically identical hemispheres in the long-term (1500-day) averages shown in Fig. 7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe jets become very weak below the tropopause and, particularly in the Uranus simulation, give way to a tropospheric zonal flow with smaller meridional scales.
“The jets become very weak below the tropopause and, particularly in the Uranus simulation, give way to a tropospheric zonal flow with smaller meridional scales (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationWithout intrinsic heat fluxes and the convection that they induce, a Jupiter simulation similar to the one here exhibits equatorial subrotation; the same is true for the Jupiter and Saturn simulations here.
“In SL09, we demonstrated that without intrinsic heat fluxes and the convection that they induce, a Jupiter simulation similar to the one here exhibits equatorial subrotation; the same is true for the Jupiter and Saturn simulations here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SL09
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe vorticity-mixing estimate is also roughly consistent with our simulations, although a state of homogenized absolute vorticity in the equatorial region of each hemisphere is not attained in the simulations.
“It is also roughly consistent with our simulations, although a state of homogenized absolute vorticity in the equatorial region of each hemisphere is not attained in the simulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIf the same enhanced drag is used at all latitudes, without an equatorial no-drag region, there is no large-scale prograde jet at the equator, while the off-equatorial flow is not substantially modified.
“However, if the same enhanced drag is used at all latitudes, without an equatorial no-drag region, there is no large-scale prograde jet at the equator, while the off-equatorial flow is not substantially modified (Fig. 9c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn the Uranus simulation, the intrinsic heat flux is negligible, the atmosphere is stably stratified, and there is no substantial convective Rossby wave source near the equator.
“In the Uranus simulation, the intrinsic heat flux is negligible, the atmosphere is stably stratified, and there is no substantial convective Rossby wave source near the equator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn the Uranus simulation, the equatorial eddy kinetic energy is weak, and the equatorial flow is retrograde.
“Consequently, the equatorial eddy kinetic energy is weak, and the equatorial flow is retrograde.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Neptune simulation, the rms Rossby wave source R' in the upper troposphere near the equator is approximately 10^-12 s^-2, whereas for Jupiter and Saturn it is approximately 10^-10 s^-2.
“the rms Rossby wave source R9 in the upper troposphere near the equator is ;10 212 s 22 for Neptune but ;10 210 s 22 for Jupiter and Saturn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBecause eddy angular momentum fluxes in our simulations generally diverge in retrograde tropospheric jets, or zonal velocity minima, and converge in prograde tropospheric jets, or zonal velocity maxima, the mean meridional mass flux in the off-equatorial upper troposphere is generally poleward in retrograde jets and equatorward in prograde jets.
“Because eddy angular momentum fluxes in our simulations generally diverge in retrograde tropospheric jets, or zonal velocity minima, and converge in prograde tropospheric jets, or zonal velocity maxima, the mean meridional mass flux in the off-equatorial upper troposphere is generally poleward in retrograde jets and equatorward in prograde jets (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThis approach gave statistically steady states in which the angular momentum balance is closed in a manner that is physically plausible and consistent with observations.
“This approach gave statistically steady states in which the angular momentum balance is closed in a manner that is physically plausible and consistent with observations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn the statistically steady states, the global-mean outgoing thermal radiative flux is within 1% of the sum of the global-mean solar radiative flux and the imposed intrinsic heat flux.
“In the statistically steady states, the global-mean outgoing thermal radiative flux is within 1% of the sum of the global-mean solar radiative flux and the imposed intrinsic heat flux.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Jupiter simulation, the stratification at the corresponding level is nearly statically neutral, so potential vorticity is not well defined.
“It is not shown for the Jupiter simulation because the stratification at the corresponding level is nearly statically neutral (cf.Fig.5below), so potential vorticity is not well defined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe simulations exhibit temperature structures that are broadly consistent with available observations, and they reproduce many details of the observed flows, for example, their vertical structure to the extent it is known and characteristic equatorial waves observed on Jupiter.
“They exhibit temperature structures that are broadly consistent with available observations, and they reproduce many details of the observed flows, for example, their vertical structure to the extent it is known and characteristic equatorial waves observed on Jupiter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRetrograde equatorial jets result if either convective Rossby wave generation is weak or absent, as on Uranus, or low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies is sufficiently strong, as on Neptune.
“Retrograde equatorial jets result if either convective Rossby wave generation is weak or absent (Uranus) or low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies is sufficiently strong (Neptune).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe equatorial jet is prograde on Jupiter and Saturn and retrograde on Uranus and Neptune.
“with an equatorial jet that is prograde on Jupiter and Saturn and retrograde on Uranus and Neptune.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPrograde equatorial jets result if convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies generated off the equator is sufficiently weak, as on Jupiter and Saturn.
“Prograde equatorial jets result if convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies generated off the equator is sufficiently weak (Jupiter and Saturn).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep-flow models that posit intrinsic heat fluxes as the sole driver of the flow can generate equatorial superrotation, but they use heat fluxes more than 10^6 times larger than those observed.
“For example, deep-flow models that posit intrinsic heat fluxes as the sole driver of the flow can generate equatorial superrotation, but they use heat fluxes more than 10 6 times larger than those observed (e.g., Heimpel and Aurnou 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heimpel and Aurnou 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenJupiter and Saturn have multiple off-equatorial jets in each hemisphere, while Uranus and Neptune have only a single off-equatorial jet in each hemisphere.
“Jupiter and Saturn have multiple off-equatorial jets in each hemisphere; Uranus and Neptune have only a single off-equatorial jet in each hemisphere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn SL09, the authors postulated that prograde equatorial jets on the giant planets occur when intrinsic heat fluxes are strong enough that Rossby waves generated convectively in the equatorial region transport angular momentum toward the equator.
“In Schneider and Liu (2009, hereafter SL09), we postulated that prograde equatorial jets on the giant planets occur when intrinsic heat fluxes are strong enough that Rossby waves generated convectively in the equatorial region transport angular momentum toward the equator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schneider and Liu (2009)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis total energy conversion rate is already about 4% of the total energy uptake of the atmosphere from intrinsic heat fluxes and absorption of solar radiation for Jupiter, or about 11% for Saturn.
“This is already ;4% of the total energy uptake of the atmosphere from intrinsic heat fluxes and absorption of solar radiation for Jupiter, or ;11% for Saturn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe observations of Jupiter and Saturn imply that eddy angular momentum fluxes cannot extend unabatedly over great depths and must have a baroclinic structure.
“The observations of Jupiter and Saturn therefore imply that eddy angular momentum fluxes cannot extend unabatedly over great depths and must have a baroclinic structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenUranus and Neptune have retrograde equatorial jets that peak at about 100 m/s and about 150-400 m/s.
“Uranus and Neptune have retrograde equatorial jets (subrotation) that peak at ;100 m s 21 and ;150-400 m s 21 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep-flow models generate equatorial subrotation only with intrinsic heat fluxes even stronger than those for which they generate superrotation, although the intrinsic heat fluxes on Uranus and Neptune are weaker than those on Jupiter and Saturn.
“They generate equatorial subrotation only with intrinsic heat fluxes even stronger than those for which they generate superrotation (Aurnou et al. 2007), although the intrinsic heat fluxes on the subrotating planets (Uranus and Neptune) are weaker than those on the superrotating planets (Jupiter and Saturn).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aurnou et al. 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe northern and southern hemispheres in the simulations are statistically identical, so differences between the hemispheres in figures showing long-term averages are indicative of the sampling variability of the averages.
“The northern and southern hemispheres in the simulations are statistically identical, so differences between the hemispheres in figures showing long-term averages are indicative of the sampling variability of the averages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenJupiter and Saturn have prograde equatorial jets that peak at about 100 m/s and about 200-400 m/s, depending on the vertical level considered.
“Jupiter and Saturn have prograde equatorial jets (superrotation) that peak at ;100 m s 21 and ;200-400 m s 21 , depending on the vertical level considered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe simulations were run to statistically steady states after long spinup periods.
“We show simulation results from statistically steady states, which were reached after long spinup periods; see the appendix for details.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIt is unclear in shallow-flow models what physical characteristics distinguish the superrotating planets from the subrotating planets.
“It is unclear in those and other shallow-flow models (e.g., Scott and Polvani 2008) what physical characteristics distinguish the superrotating planets from the subrotating planets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scott and Polvani 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExisting models posit as the driver of the flow either the differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere or the intrinsic heat fluxes emanating from the deep interior.
“Existing models posit as the driver of the flow either the differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere (e.g., Williams 1979Williams , 2003b) ) or the intrinsic heat fluxes emanating from the deep interior (e.g., Busse 1976;Heimpel et al. 2005;Aurnou et al. 2007;Chan and Mayr 2008;Kaspi et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe resolution in each simulation (T85 to T213 spectral resolution in the horizontal and 30 or 40 levels in the vertical) is sufficient to resolve baroclinic instability and the energy-containing eddies in the upper atmosphere.
“The resolution in each simulation (T85 to T213 spectral resolution in the horizontal and 30 or 40 levels in the vertical) is sufficient to resolve baroclinic instability and the energy-containing eddies in the upper atmosphere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationShallow-flow models that posit differential radiative heating as the driver of the flow can generate equatorial superrotation, but they require artifices such as additional equatorial heat or wave sources that have no clear physical interpretation.
“Similarly, shallow-flow models that posit differential radiative heating as the driver of the flow can generate equatorial superrotation, but they require artifices such as additional equatorial heat or wave sources that have no clear physical interpretation (e.g., Williams 2003a,b;Yamazaki et al. 2005;Lian and Showman 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Williams 2003a,b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yamazaki et al. 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lian and Showman 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningConsistent with thermal wind balance, temperatures increase equatorward along isobars where prograde jets weaken with depth or retrograde jets strengthen with depth, and they decrease equatorward where the opposite is true.
“Consistent with thermal wind balance, temperatures increase equatorward along isobars where prograde jets weaken with depth or retrograde jets strengthen with depth, and they decrease equatorward where the opposite is true.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe vorticity profiles indicate that barotropic instability limits the sharpening of the retrograde jets, though not to the degree that the statistically steady states of the flows would satisfy sufficient conditions for linear barotropic stability for unforced and nondissipative flows.
“The vorticity profiles indicate that barotropic instability limits the sharpening of the retrograde jets, though not to the degree that the statistically steady states of the flows would satisfy sufficient 1.The quasigeostrophic potential vorticity is calculated analogously to Read et al. (2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe undulation is retrograde, and retrograde relative to the mean flow, consistent with the undulation being a Rossby wave.
“This is retrograde, and retrograde relative to the mean flow, consistent with the undulation being a Rossby wave.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCoherent vortices preferentially exist in regions where absolute vorticity or potential vorticity gradients vanish, as they can then arise spontaneously in barotropic or quasigeostrophic flows and remain stable.
“Coherent vortices preferentially exist in regions where absolute vorticity or potential vorticity gradients vanish, as they can then arise spontaneously in barotropic or quasigeostrophic flows and remain stable (e.g., McWilliams 1984;Marcus 1988Marcus , 1993)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSince the radiative time scale increases with pressure, it is longer for deeper atmospheres, which might explain why the observed coherent vortices such as the Great Red Spot on Jupiter are so long lived.
“Since the radiative time scale increases with pressure, it is longer for deeper atmospheres, which might explain why the observed coherent vortices such as the Great Red Spot on Jupiter are so long lived.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese cyclonic vortices are long lived, with life spans apparently determined by the radiative time scale.
“These cyclonic vortices are long lived, with life spans apparently determined by the radiative time scale (the time scale on which eddies can modify the mean flow).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAway from the equator, the differential radiative heating of the upper atmospheres produces meridional temperature gradients, which are baroclinically unstable and lead to eddy generation.
“Away from the equator, the differential radiative heating of the upper atmospheres produces meridional temperature gradients, which are baroclinically unstable and lead to eddy generation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMore generally, entropy is constant along angular momentum surfaces, to achieve a state of neutrality with respect to slantwise convection.
“[More generally, entropy is constant along angular momentum surfaces, to achieve a state of neutrality with respect to slantwise convection; see Emanuel (1983) and Thorpe and Rotunno (1989).]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Emanuel (1983) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thorpe and Rotunno (1989)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe fundamental reason for the different flow and temperature structures in the giant planet simulations lies in the different strengths of the differential radiative heating and the intrinsic heat flux and in the different ways in which the two can lead to the generation of the eddies that maintain the jets.
“The fundamental reason lies in the different strengths of the differential radiative heating and the intrinsic heat flux and in the different ways in which the two can lead to the generation of the eddies that maintain the jets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThere are no observations of entropy or temperature distributions below the upper troposphere for the giant planets, but the authors expect them to behave similarly as in their simulations.
“There are no observations of entropy or temperature distributions below the upper troposphere for the giant planets, but we expect them to behave similarly as in our simulations, for the reasons discussed in section 5c below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough temperature contrasts at the emission level are generally small, equator-to-pole temperature contrasts at higher or lower levels of the simulated atmospheres differ, and the same is likely true for the actual planets.
“However, although temperature contrasts at the emission level are generally small, equator-to-pole temperature contrasts at higher or lower levels of the simulated atmospheres differ, and the same is likely true for the actual planets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFluctuations in convective heating are primarily balanced by vertical motion and, at the level of the convective outflows, by horizontal divergence of mass fluxes, as in the tropics of Earth's atmosphere.
“Fluctuations in convective heating are primarily balanced by vertical motion and, at the level of the convective outflows, by horizontal divergence of mass fluxes, as in the tropics of Earth's atmosphere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sobel et al. 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause the planetary vorticity vanishes at the equator, the Rossby wave source R' typically has largest amplitude just off the equator, but it does not necessarily vanish at the equator or where the absolute vorticity vanishes because absolute vorticity advection by the divergent flow may not vanish.
“Because the planetary vorticity vanishes at the equator, the Rossby wave source R9 typically has largest amplitude just off the equator, but it does not necessarily vanish at the equator or where the absolute vorticity vanishes because absolute vorticity advection by the divergent flow may not vanish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFluctuations in the horizontal divergence are a source of equatorial Rossby waves, and the fluctuating vorticity source R' can be taken to be the Rossby wave source.
“As discussed in Sardeshmukh and Hoskins (1988), fluctuations in the horizontal divergence are a source of equatorial Rossby waves, and the fluctuating vorticity source”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sardeshmukh and Hoskins (1988)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFluctuations in convective heating lead to horizontal divergence fluctuations, which can generate equatorial Rossby waves through stretching of absolute vorticity or advection of absolute vorticity by the divergent flow.
“Thus, fluctuations in convective heating lead to horizontal divergence fluctuations (1), which can generate equatorial Rossby waves through stretching of absolute vorticity z a or advection of absolute vorticity by the divergent flow v x (2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe angular momentum transport toward the equatorial region by convectively generated Rossby waves leads to equatorial superrotation if it is sufficiently strong and drag on the zonal flow is sufficiently weak.
“The angular momentum transport toward the equatorial region by convectively generated Rossby waves leads to equatorial superrotation if it is sufficiently strong and drag on the zonal flow is sufficiently weak (SL09).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SL09
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningConvectively generated Rossby waves transport angular momentum toward the equatorial region because this is where they are preferentially generated.
“This is generally to be expected for such convectively generated Rossby waves: they transport angular momentum toward the equatorial region because this is where they are preferentially generated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe structure of the stratospheric jets implies that they interact only weakly with the drag at the lower boundary, so only weak eddy angular momentum flux divergence is necessary to maintain them.
“The structure of the stratospheric jets implies that they interact only weakly with the drag at the lower boundary, so only weak eddy angular momentum flux divergence is necessary to maintain them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe Rossby wave source R' owing to horizontally divergent flow has largest amplitude in the equatorial region because only there will convective heating fluctuations necessarily lead to horizontal divergence fluctuations on large scales; away from the equator, the WTG approximation does not hold.
“The Rossby wave source R9 owing to horizontally divergent flow has largest amplitude in the equatorial region because only there will convective heating fluctuations necessarily lead to horizontal divergence fluctuations on large scales; away from the equator, the WTG approximation (1) of the thermodynamic equation does not hold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SL09
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOff-equatorial baroclinic eddy generation implies angular momentum flux convergence in the off-equatorial generation regions and divergence in lower latitudes, and hence a tendency toward retrograde equatorial flow.
“Off-equatorial baroclinic eddy generation implies angular momentum flux convergence in the off-equatorial generation regions and divergence in lower latitudes, and hence a tendency toward retrograde equatorial flow.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVorticity mixing arguments give an estimate for the maximum strength of the equatorial jet: if the end state of vorticity mixing is a state in which the absolute vorticity is homogenized across the equatorial jet in each hemisphere separately, with a barotropically stable jump at the equator, and if the jet half-width L_s is similar to the equatorial Rossby radius L_b, the jet speed at the equator
“Vorticity mixing arguments give an estimate for the maximum strength of the equatorial jet (Rhines 1994; SL09): If the end state of vorticity mixing is a state in which the absolute vorticity is homogenized across the equatorial jet in each hemisphere separately, with a barotropically stable jump at the equator, and if the jet half-width L s is similar to the equatorial Rossby radius L b , the jet”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rhines 1994 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SL09
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNeptune's intrinsic heat flux only needs to be larger by an O(1) factor for Neptune's atmosphere to develop equatorial superrotation, implying that Neptune may have been superrotating earlier in its history, when intrinsic heat fluxes were stronger.
“Interestingly, our simulations suggest that Neptune's intrinsic heat flux only needs to be larger by an O(1) factor for Neptune's atmosphere to develop equatorial superrotation, implying that Neptune may have been superrotating earlier in its history, when intrinsic heat fluxes were stronger.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe vorticity-mixing estimate is roughly consistent with observations of Jupiter and Saturn, although the maximum equatorial jet speed on Saturn is not known for lack of observations deeper in the atmosphere.
“This is roughly consistent with observations of Jupiter and Saturn (but the maximum equatorial jet speed on Saturn is not known for lack of observations deeper in the atmosphere).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe same pattern of eddy angular momentum fluxes and mean meridional mass flux is almost certainly true on Jupiter and Saturn, where similar eddy angular momentum fluxes in the upper troposphere have been observed.
“The same is almost certainly true on Jupiter and Saturn, where similar eddy angular momentum fluxes in the upper troposphere have been observed (Salyk et al. 2006;Del Genio et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNeither the precise functional form of the drag, nor the magnitude of the drag coefficient where it is nonzero, nor the width of the no-drag region appears to be essential for our results-as long as there is an equatorial region with no or sufficiently low drag such that a large-scale prograde jet can form.
“However, neither the precise functional form of the drag, nor the magnitude of the drag coefficient where it is nonzero, nor the width of the no-drag region appears to be essential for our results-as long as there is an equatorial region with no or sufficiently low drag such that a large-scale prograde jet can form.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningConvection tends to homogenize entropy along columns in the direction of the planet's spin axis (in deep atmospheres) or in the vertical (in thin atmospheres); however, it does not constrain entropy gradients in perpendicular directions.
“Therefore, convection tends to homogenize entropy along columns in the direction of the planet's spin axis (in deep atmospheres) or in the vertical (in thin atmospheres); however, it does not constrain entropy gradients in perpendicular directions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenConvection in general does not homogenize entropy in directions perpendicular to angular momentum surfaces, so an isentropic interior cannot be assumed a priori.
“However, convection in general does not homogenize entropy in directions perpendicular to angular momentum surfaces, so an isentropic interior cannot be assumed a priori.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe WTG approximation holds where the Rossby number satisfies Ro << 1 and the Froude number satisfies Fr << 1.
“The WTG approximation holds where the Rossby number satisfies Ro U/jfLj * 1 and the Froude number satisfies Fr 5 UV/(gH) ( 1, where U is a zonal velocity scale, V a meridional or eddy velocity scale, L a length scale of flow variations, and H the scale height(Charney 1963; SL09).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Charney 1963 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SL09
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe thermal optical depths t_l0 at pressure p0 are chosen such that the observed thermal emission levels of the giant planets approximately correspond to t_l = 1.
“The thermal optical depths t l0 at pressure p 0 are chosen such that the observed thermal emission levels (e.g., Ingersoll 1990) of the giant planets approximately correspond to t l 5 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ingersoll 1990 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe depth of that layer can be expected to affect quantitative aspects such as the vertical shear of the zonal flow, but we do not expect it to affect the qualitative aspects and large-scale flow features on which we have focused.
“The depth of that layer can be expected to affect quantitative aspects such as the vertical shear of the zonal flow, but we do not expect it to affect the qualitative aspects and large-scale flow features on which we have focused.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEquatorial superrotation is generated if convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies generated off the equator is sufficiently weak (Jupiter and Saturn); equatorial subrotation results if either convective Rossby wave generation is weak or absent (Uranus) or low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclin-
“We have demonstrated that equatorial superrotation is generated if convective Rossby wave generation is strong and low-latitude angular momentum flux divergence owing to baroclinic eddies generated off the equator is sufficiently weak (Jupiter and Saturn); equatorial subrotation results if either convective Rossby wave generation is weak or absent (Uranus) or low-latitude angular momentum flux”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTo the extent that vertical shear and convective momentum fluxes cannot be neglected, they may amplify the superrotation in the upper troposphere in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations.
“But to the extent that the vertical shear and convective momentum fluxes cannot be neglected, they may amplify the superrotation in the upper troposphere in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, as the equatorial zonal flow in those simulations is stronger at depth than in the upper troposphere, so that convection can be expected to transport momentum upward.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The convection scheme assumes a convective Prandtl number of zero (does not transport momentum).
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the interiors of Jupiter and Saturn, the conductivity of molecular hydrogen increases with depth and becomes approximately constant where hydrogen becomes metallic at ~1.4 Mbar.
“In the interior of Jupiter and Saturn, the conductivity of molecular hydrogen increases with depth and becomes approximately constant where hydrogen becomes metallic at ;1.4 Mbar (Nellis et al. 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nellis et al. 1996 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the high-conductivity interior, the interaction of the magnetic field and the fluid flow produces Ohmic dissipation and retards the flow.
“In the high-conductivity interior, the interaction of the magnetic field and the fluid flow produces Ohmic dissipation and retards the flow (Liu et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al. 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWhere the convective Rossby number is not necessarily small, convective plumes are aligned with angular momentum (M) surfaces.
“More generally, where the convective Rossby number is not necessarily small, convective plumes are aligned with angular momentum (M) surfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWhere latent heat release in phase changes of water is dynamically important, a moist entropy can be expected to be homogenized in the direction of the spin axis.
“Where latent heat release in phase changes of water is dynamically important, a moist entropy rather than a dry entropy should be considered, and such a moist entropy can be expected to be homogenized in the direction of the spin axis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIf entropy deviations from an isentropic reference state are not small so that the anelastic approximation cannot be made, the thermal wind balance becomes more complicated.
“If entropy deviations from an isentropic reference state are not small so that the anelastic approximation cannot be made, the thermal wind balance (13) becomes more complicated(Kaspi et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kaspi et al. 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenAll parameter choices are constrained by knowledge of the physical properties of the planets and material properties of their atmospheres, as well as by observations where available.
“All parameter choices are constrained by knowledge of the physical properties of the planets and material properties of their atmospheres, as well as by observations where available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningLatent heat release in phase changes of water does not represent an external heat source, merely a conversion between forms of energy, and hence it does not affect the integrated energy balance.
“Latent heat release in phase changes of water may play a role in that layer, but it does not represent an external heat source, merely a conversion between forms of energy, and hence it does not affect the integrated energy balance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis does not affect the qualitative considerations on which the paper's conclusions are based.
“But this does not affect the qualitative considerations on which our conclusions are based.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the interiors of Uranus and Neptune, the conductivity of the gas envelope increases with depth and is determined by the conductivity of hydrogen and water ice.
“In the interior of Uranus and Neptune, the conductivity of the gas envelope likewise increases with depth and is determined by the conductivity of hydrogen and water ice (Nellis et al. 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nellis et al. 1997 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBy choosing drag formulations that differ from planet to planet, better fits to observations could be obtained.
“By choosing drag formulations that differ from planet to planet, better fits to observations could be obtained (cf.section 4d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The solar optical properties of the giant planet atmospheres are not well constrained.
“The solar optical properties of the giant planet atmospheres are not well constrained.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Prandtl numbers for dry convection are usually greater than zero.
“Prandtl numbers for dry convection are usually greater than zero”
The paper relies on this without support.
The drag formulation at the artificial lower boundary of the GCM is poorly constrained by data or physics.
“However, the drag formulation at the artificial lower boundary of the GCM is poorly constrained by data or physics.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The convection scheme assumes a convective Prandtl number of zero (does not transport momentum).
“The convection scheme does not transport momentum; that is, it assumes a convective Prandtl number of zero.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Linear (Rayleigh) drag acts near the GCM's lower boundary, but only outside an equatorial latitude band.
“We assume linear (Rayleigh) drag acts near the GCM's lower boundary, but only outside an equatorial latitude band (see SL09 and section 5d).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The drag formulation represents the MHD drag the flow experiences in the interior of the planets.
“It represents the MHD drag the flow experiences in the interior of the planets.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alternating jets on gas giant planets are either shallow, existing above about 10 bars, or deep, extending to tens of thousands of bars.
“on one hand, the alternating jets on gas giant planets are 'shallow', existing above 10 bars or so [15-17]; on the other hand, zonal jets are 'deep', extending to tens of thousands of bars [18-22].”
From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation is attached to the deep-jet clause, not the shallow-jet clause. The Conclusions (page not provided) say zonal jets should extend to the depth where drag acts, and the General circulation model section places the proposed deep drag at pressures above about 10^5 bar. The paper presents this depth as an inference rather than an observed extent, and it does not give the claimed figure of tens of thousands of bars. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe latitudinal difference in jet and vortex structure is likely driven by the topographical beta effect, which is stronger near the equator and promotes axisymmetric jets, while at higher latitudes the beta effect decreases and the system approaches a rotating plane layer where giant vortices are favored.
“This is likely driven by the topographical β effect, due to the spherical shell geometry, which is stronger near the equator, promoting strong axisymmetric jets, while, at higher latitudes, the β -effect decreases and the system approaches a rotating plane layer where the formation of giant vortices is favored”
From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Cites
Quasi-geostrophic motions in the equatorial area.
Matsuno, T. (1966) · Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser II · doi:10.2151/jmsj1965.44.1_25 · Cited by 2,724 · see citing works
Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere
Charney, J. G., & Drazin, P. G. (1961) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jz066i001p00083 · Cited by 1,689 · see citing works
Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics: Fundamentals and Large-scale Circulation
Vallis, G. K. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790447 · Cited by 1,599 · see citing works
Available potential energy and the maintenance of the general circulation.
Lorenz, E. N. (1955) · Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography · doi:10.3402/tellusa.v7i2.8796 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Emanuel, K. A. (1994) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195066302.001.0001 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
Peixoto, J. P., Oort, A. H., Covey, C., & Taylor, K. E. (1992) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2809772 · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
The emergence of isolated coherent vortices in turbulent flow.
Mcwilliams, J. C. (1984) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112084001750 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
Non-linear properties of thermal convection
Busse, F. H. (1978) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/41/12/003 · Cited by 960 · see citing works
The Maximum Intensity of Hurricanes
Emanuel, K. (1988) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
An exact theory of nonlinear waves on a Lagrangian-mean flow
Andrews, D., & McIntyre, M. E. (1978) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112078002773 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
The interiors of giant planets: Models and outstanding questions.
Guillot, T. (2005) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120325 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
The Planetary Scientist’s Companion
Lodders, K., & Fegley, B. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195116946.001.0001 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Cassini Imaging of Jupiter's Atmosphere, Satellites, and Rings
Porco, C. C., West, R. A., McEwen, A. S., C, A. D. D. G., Ingersoll, A. P., Thomas, P. C., Squyres, S. W., Luke Dones, B., Murray, C. D., Johnson, T. V., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1079462 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
A Comparison of Breeding and Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter Ensemble Forecast Schemes
Wang, X., & Bishop, C. (2003) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Jovian atmospheric dynamics: an update after Galileo and Cassini
Vasavada, A. R., & Showman, A. P. (2005) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/8/r06 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
A comparison of the interiors of Jupiter and Saturn
Guillot, T. (1999) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/s0032-0633(99)00043-4 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
How well do we understand the dynamics of stratospheric warmings?
McIntyre, M. E. (1982) · Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser II · doi:10.2151/jmsj1965.60.1_37 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Multiple Jets as PV Staircases: The Phillips Effect and the Resilience of Eddy-Transport Barriers
Dritschel, D. G., & McIntyre, M. E. (2008) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/2007jas2227.1 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Improving the Anelastic Approximation
Durran, D. R. (1989) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Simulation of equatorial and high-latitude jets on Jupiter in a deep convection model
Heimpel, M., Aurnou, J., & Wicht, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04208 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
A simple model of convection in the Jovian atmosphere
Busse, F. H. (1976) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(76)90053-1 · Cited by 278 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…models posit as the driver of the flow either the differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere (e.g., Williams 1979, 2003b) or the intrinsic heat fluxes emanating from the deep interior (e.g., Busse 1976; Heimpel et al. 2005; Aurnou et al. 2007; Chan and Mayr 2008; Kaspi et al. 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialAtreya, S. K., Wong, M. H., Owen, T., Mahaffy, P. R., Niemann, H., de Pater, I., Drossart, P., & Encrenaz, T. A. (1999) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/s0032-0633(99)00047-1 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Jupiter’s Great Red Spot and other vortices.
Marcus, P. S. (1993) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002515 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Observation of moist convection in Jupiter's atmosphere
Gierasch, P. J., Ingersoll, A. P., Banfield, D., Ewald, S. P., Helfenstein, P., Simon, A. A., Vasavada, A. R., Breneman, H. H., Senske, D. A., & Galileo Imaging Team (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001017 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Constraints on deep seated zonal winds inside Jupiter and Saturn.
LIU, J., GOLDREICH, P., & STEVENSON, D. (2008) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.11.036 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationAtmospheric Dynamics of the Outer Planets
Ingersoll, A. P. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.248.4953.308 · Cited by 199 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…observed temperature contrast near the emission level (Ingersoll et al. 1976; Ingersoll 1990; Ingersoll et al. 2004; Simon-Miller et al. 2006).4 In the Saturn simulation, the equator-topole brightness temperature contrast is 7 K, consistent with observations (Ingersoll 1990; Fletcher et al. 2007).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInteraction of eddies and mean zonal flow on Jupiter as inferred from Voyager 1 and 2 images.
Ingersoll, A. P., Beebe, R. F., Mitchell, J. L., Garneau, G. W., Yagi, G. M., & Müller, J. (1981) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/ja086ia10p08733 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Turbulent diffusion in the geostrophic inverse cascade
Smith, K. S., Boccaletti, G., Henning, C. C., Marinov, I., Tam, C., Held, I. M., & Vallis, G. K. (2002) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112002001763 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Interior structure of Neptune: Comparison with Uranus.
Hubbard, W. B., Nellis, W. J., Mitchell, A. C., Holmes, N. C., Limaye, S. S., & McCandless, P. C. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5020.648 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Moist convection as an energy source for the large-scale motions in Jupiter's atmosphere
Ingersoll, A. P., Gierasch, P. J., Banfield, D., Vasavada, A. R., & Galileo Imaging Team (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001021 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Numerical simulation of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot.
Marcus, P. S. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/331693a0 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Formation of Jets and Equatorial Superrotation on Jupiter
Schneider, T., & Liu, J. (2008) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/2008jas2798.1 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationA hexagonal feature around Saturn's north pole
Godfrey, D. A. (1988) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(88)90075-9 · Cited by 156 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The undulation is reminiscent of the nearly stationary wavenumber-6 pattern (“polar hexagon”) observed in Saturn’s polar atmosphere at 76◦N planetocentric latitude (Godfrey 1988; Allison et al. 1990; Fletcher et al. 2008).”
BackgroundSchneider, T., & Walker, C. C. (2006) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/jas3699.1 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationThe deep wind structure of the giant planets: Results from an anelastic general circulation model
Kaspi, Y., Flierl, G. R., & Showman, A. P. (2009) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.03.026 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
The Galileo Probe Doppler Wind Experiment: Measurement of the deep zonal winds on Jupiter.
Atkinson, D. H., Pollack, J. B., & Seiff, A. (1998) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/98je00060 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Hanel, R., Conrath, B. J., Herath, L. W., Kunde, V. G., & Pirraglia, J. A. (1981) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/ja086ia10p08705 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Temperature and Composition of Saturn's Polar Hot Spots and Hexagon
Fletcher, L. N., Irwin, P. G. J., Orton, G. S., Teanby, N. A., Achterberg, R. K., Bjoraker, G. L., Read, P. L., Simon-Miller, A. A., Howett, C., de Kok, R., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1149514 · Cited by 125 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The undulation is reminiscent of the nearly stationary wavenumber-6 pattern (“polar hexagon”) observed in Saturn’s polar atmosphere at 76◦N planetocentric latitude (Godfrey 1988; Allison et al. 1990; Fletcher et al. 2008).”
BackgroundJupiter’s atmospheric temperatures: From Voyager IRIS to Cassini CIRS.
SIMONMILLER, A., CONRATH, B., GIERASCH, P., ORTON, G., ACHTERBERG, R., FLASAR, F., & FISHER, B. (2006) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.07.019 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Interaction between eddies and mean flow in Jupiter’s atmosphere: Analysis of Cassini imaging data.
Salyk, C., Ingersoll, A. P., Lorre, J., Vasavada, A., & Del Genio, A. D. (2006) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.08.007 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Heimpel, M., & Aurnou, J. (2007) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.10.023 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Generation of equatorial jets by large-scale latent heating on the giant planets
Lian, Y., & Showman, A. P. (2009) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.10.006 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Albedo, internal heat flux, and energy balance of Saturn
Hanel, R., Conrath, B. J., Kunde, V. G., Pearl, J. C., & Pirraglia, J. A. (1983) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(83)90147-1 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Metallization and electrical conductivity of hydrogen in Jupiter.
Nellis, W. J., Weir, S. T., & Mitchell, A. C. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5277.936 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
The effects of vigorous mixing in a convective model of zonal flow on the ice giants.
Aurnou, J., Heimpel, M., & Wicht, J. (2007) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.02.024 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Rhines, P. B. (1994) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.166011 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Galileo Probe measurements of thermal and solar radiation fluxes in the Jovian atmosphere.
Sromovsky, L. A., Collard, A. D., Fry, P. M., Orton, G. S., Lemmon, M. T., Tomasko, M. G., & Freedman, R. S. (1998) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/98je01048 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Solar heating and internal heat flow on Jupiter
Ingersoll, A. P., & Porco, C. C. (1978) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(78)90058-1 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
A Wave Dynamical Interpretation of Saturn's Polar Hexagon
Allison, M., Godfrey, D. A., & Beebe, R. F. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4946.1061 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Characterising Saturn's vertical temperature structure from Cassini/CIRS
FLETCHER, L., IRWIN, P., TEANBY, N., ORTON, G., PARRISH, P., DEKOK, R., HOWETT, C., CALCUTT, S., BOWLES, N., & TAYLOR, F. (2007) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.02.006 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Coordinated 1996 HST and IRTF Imaging of Neptune and Triton
Sromovsky, L. A., Fry, P. M., Dowling, T. E., Baines, K. H., & Limaye, S. S. (2001) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.2000.6564 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Deep jets on gas-giant planets
Lian, Y., & Showman, A. P. (2007) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.10.014 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Mapping potential vorticity dynamics on saturn: Zonal mean circulation from Cassini and Voyager data
Read, P. L., Conrath, B. J., Fletcher, L. N., Gierasch, P. J., Simon-Miller, A. A., & Zuchowski, L. C. (2009) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2009.03.004 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Read, P. L., Gierasch, P. J., Conrath, B. J., Simon, A. A., Fouchet, T., & Yamazaki, Y. H. (2006) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1256/qj.05.34 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
New Measurements of the Winds of Uranus
Hammel, H. B. (2001) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.2001.6689 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
JONES, C. A., Kuzanyan, K. M., & Mitchell, R. H. (2009) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112009007253 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Jovian Dynamics. Part III: Multiple, Migrating, and Equatorial Jets
WILLIAMS, G. P. (2003) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2003)60 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
A strong decrease in Saturn's equatorial jet at cloud level
Sánchez-Lavega, A., Pérez-Hoyos, S., Rojas, J. F., Hueso, R., & French, R. G. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01653 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Nellis, W. J., Holmes, N. C., Mitchell, A. C., Hamilton, D. C., & Nicol, M. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.475200 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Equatorial superrotation in shallow atmospheres
SCOTT, R. K., & Polvani, L. M. (2008) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2008gl036060 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Saturn eddy momentum fluxes and convection: First estimates from Cassini images.
DELGENIO, A., BARBARA, J., FERRIER, J., INGERSOLL, A., WEST, R., VASAVADA, A., SPITALE, J., & PORCO, C. (2007) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.02.013 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Pioneer 10 and 11 observations and the dynamics of Jupiter's atmosphere
Ingersoll, A. P. (1976) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(76)90052-x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Uranus in 2003: Zonal winds, banded structure, and discrete features
Hammel, H. B., de Pater, I., Gibbard, S. G., Lockwood, G. W., & Rages, K. A. (2005) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.11.012 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Levine, J. S., Kraemer, D. R. B., & Kuhn, W. R. (1977) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(77)90076-8 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Rhines scale and spectra of the β-plane turbulence with bottom drag
Danilov, S. D., & Gurarie, D. (2002) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.65.067301 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The three-dimensional structure of Saturn’s equatorial jet at cloud level.
Sánchez-Lavega, A., Hueso, R., & Pérez-Hoyos, S. (2007) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.10.022 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The altitude of Neptune cloud features from high-spatial-resolution near-infrared spectra
Gibbard, S. G., de Pater, I., Roe, H. G., Martin, S. C., Macintosh, B., & Max, C. E. (2003) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.07.006 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Hadley circulations and Kelvin wave–driven equatorial jets in the atmospheres of Jupiter and Saturn.
Yamazaki, Y. H., Read, P. L., & Skeet, D. R. (2005) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2004.03.009 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
O’Gorman, P. A., & Schneider, T. (2008) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/2007jas2280.1 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationA shallow convective model for Jupiter's alternating wind bands
Chan, K. L., & Mayr, H. G. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2008je003124 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Emanuel (1983) · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111
Held (1975) · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032
Haynes (1991) · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048
Williams (1979) · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036
Sobel (2001) · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058
Charney (1963) · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global climate modeling of Saturn’s atmosphere. Part I: Evaluation of the radiative transfer model
Guerlet, S., Spiga, A., Sylvestre, M., Indurain, M., Fouchet, T., Leconte, J., Millour, E., Wordsworth, R., Capderou, M., Bézard, B., et al. (2014) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.010 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn
Yadav, R. K., & Bloxham, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2000317117 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, J., & Schneider, T.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Schneider, Tapio
- Venue
- Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2010-11-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3652-3672
- ISSN
- 0022-4928 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0469
- OpenAlex
- W2141312495
- Semantic Scholar
- 69700378f3de4f941b1eae9ab39590467d490132
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts
- AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #42
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX10AQ05G)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
- Keywords
- giant planet atmospheres, equatorial jet, convection, Rossby waves, baroclinic eddies, vertical shear, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, global climate models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review