Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 96

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Formation of Phobos and Deimos via a giant impact

Citron, Robert I., Genda, Hidenori, Ida, Shigeru·2015·Icarus

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.02.011

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Agnor, 2004, Accretion efficiency during planetary collisions, Astrophys. J., 613, L157, 10.1086/425158 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Andert, 2010, Precise mass determination and the nature of Phobos, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09202, 10.1029/2009GL041829 · doi:10.1029/2009gl041829
  3. Andrews-Hanna, 2008, The Borealis basin and the origin of the martian crustal dichotomy, Nature, 453, 1212, 10.1038/nature07011 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Benz, 1986, The origin of the Moon and the single-impact hypothesis. I, Icarus, 66, 515, 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90088-6 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Benz, 1987, The origin of the Moon and the single-impact hypothesis. II, Icarus, 71, 30, 10.1016/0019-1035(87)90160-6 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Benz, 1989, The origin of the Moon and the single impact hypothesis. III, Icarus, 81, 113, 10.1016/0019-1035(89)90129-2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bottke, 2000, Interpreting the elliptical crater populations on Mars, Venus, and the Moon, Icarus, 145, 108, 10.1006/icar.1999.6323 · DOI
  8. Burns, 1978, On the orbital evolution and origin of the martian moons, Vistas Astron., 22, 193, 10.1016/0083-6656(78)90015-6 · DOI
  9. Cameron, 1997, The origin of the Moon and the single impact hypothesis. V, Icarus, 126, 126, 10.1006/icar.1996.5642 · DOI
  10. Cameron, 1991, The origin of the Moon and the single impact hypothesis. IV, Icarus, 92, 204, 10.1016/0019-1035(91)90046-V · DOI · Paper page
  11. Canup, R.M., Salmon, J., 2014. On an impact origin of Phobos-Deimos. In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, vol. 46 (abstract).
  12. Canup, 2001, A scaling relationship for satellite-forming impacts, Icarus, 150, 288, 10.1006/icar.2000.6581 · DOI
  13. Craddock, 2011, Are Phobos and Deimos the result of a giant impact?, Icarus, 211, 1150, 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.10.023 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cuk, 2012, Making the Moon from a fast-spinning Earth: A giant impact followed by resonant despinning, Science, 338, 1047, 10.1126/science.1225542 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gault, 1974, Impact cratering, Primer Lunar Geol., 137
  16. Gault, D.E., Wedekind, J.A., 1977. Experimental hypervelocity impact into quartz sand – II: Effects of gravitational acceleration. In: Impact and Explosion Cratering: Planetary and Terrestrial Implications; Proceedings of the Symposium on Planetary Cratering Mechanics, pp. 1231–1244.
  17. Genda, 2012, Merging criteria for giant impacts of protoplanets, Astrophys. J., 744, 137, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/137 · DOI
  18. Giuranna, 2011, Compositional interpretation of PFS/MEx and TES/MGS thermal infrared spectra of Phobos, Planet. Space Sci., 59, 1308, 10.1016/j.pss.2011.01.019 · DOI
  19. Ida, 1997, Lunar accretion from an impact-generated disk, Nature, 389, 353, 10.1038/38669 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Marinova, 2008, Mega-impact formation of the Mars hemispheric dichotomy, Nature, 453, 1216, 10.1038/nature07070 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Monaghan, 1992, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., vol. 30 (A93-25826 09-90), 30, 543, 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Murchie, 1991, Color heterogeneity of the surface of PHOBOS – Relationships to geologic features and comparison to meteorite analogs, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 5925, 10.1029/90JB02354 · doi:10.1029/90jb02354
  23. Nimmo, 2008, Implications of an impact origin for the martian hemispheric dichotomy, Nature, 453, 1220, 10.1038/nature07025 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pätzold, 2014, Phobos: Observed bulk properties, Planet. Space Sci., 102, 86, 10.1016/j.pss.2014.01.004 · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.01.004
  25. Reese, 2011, Impact megadomes and the origin of the martian crustal dichotomy, Icarus, 213, 433, 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.03.028 · DOI
  26. Richardson, 2002, Gravitational aggregates: Evidence and evolution, Asteroids III, 501, 10.2307/j.ctv1v7zdn4.38 · DOI
  27. Rosenblatt, 2011, The origin of the martian moons revisited, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 19, 1, 10.1007/s00159-011-0044-6 · DOI
  28. Rosenblatt, 2012, On the formation of the martian moons from a circum-martian accretion disk, Icarus, 221, 806, 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.09.009 · DOI
  29. Schultz, 1982, The structure and evolution of ancient impact basins on Mars, Int. Colloq. Mars, 87, 9803
  30. Strom, 1992, The martian impact cratering record, Mars, 383
  31. Tillotson, 1962, Metallic Equations of State for Hypervelocity Impact, General Atomic Rept. GA-3216, 1
  32. Witasse, 2014, Mars express investigations of Phobos and Deimos, Planet. Space Sci., 102, 18, 10.1016/j.pss.2013.08.002 · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2013.08.002

Cited by

See all 96

Metadata

Authors
Citron, R. I., Genda, H., & Ida, S.
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
252
Pages
334-338
ISSN
0019-1035
Cited by
96
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • NSF’s East Asia and Pacific Summer Institute
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science’s Summer Science Program

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formation of Phobos and Deimos via a giant impact. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.02.011
The paper
Citron, R. I., Genda, H., & Ida, S. (2015). Formation of Phobos and Deimos via a giant impact. Icarus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.02.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.