CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 123Occupational Health and BurnoutHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patient safety and job-related stress: A focus group study

Open access
Berland, Astrid, Natvig, Gerd Karin, Gundersen, Doris·2008·Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
DOI 10.1016/j.iccn.2007.11.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study focused on work-related stress among nurses working with critically ill patients. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of work-related stress with regard to patient safety. The study uses a qualitative design based on focus group interviews with nurses who work with acute, critically ill patients in hospitals. Two regional hospitals were chosen. Inclusion criteria for the focus group panels included the following: nurses with advanced training in anesthesiology, intensive care, or operating-room nursing. Twenty-three nurses were chosen and they were divided into four groups. This study shows that a demanding work environment together with minimal control and social support from colleagues results in increased stress that can often have an effect on patient safety.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.iccn.2007.11.001

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 35 references

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–123 of 123

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Berland, A., Natvig, G. K., & Gundersen, D.
Affiliations
  • Høgskolen Stord/Haugesund (NO)
  • Fonna Hospital Trust (NO)
Corresponding author
Berland, Astrid
Venue
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
90-97
ISSN
0964-3397 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.iccn.2007.11.001
OpenAlex
W2029076153
Cited by
123
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Intensive and Critical Care Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
patient safety, occupational stress, nurses, critically ill patients, critical care nursing, anaesthetic nursing, operating room nursing, work environment, perceived control
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Burnout, Professional, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Health Facility Environment, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interprofessional Relations, Job Satisfaction, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Patient Advocacy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Nursing Methodology Research, Professional Autonomy, Focus Groups, Safety Management, Nurse's Role, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review