Cited by 6,939Focus Groups and Qualitative MethodsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsDelphi Technique in Research

Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.

Open access
Kitzinger, Jenny·1995·BMJ

Abstract

This paper introduces focus group methodology, gives advice on group composition, running the groups, and analysing the results. Focus groups have advantages for researchers in the field of health and medicine: they do not discriminate against people who cannot read or write and they can encourage participation from people reluctant to be interviewed on their own or who feel they have nothing to say.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interviews and focus groups foster collaboration and inclusivity, especially when paired with critical assessment frameworks that emphasize equity and representation.

    “Such methods foster collaboration and inclusivity (Kitzinger, 1995), especially when paired with critical assessment frameworks that emphasize equity and representation.”

    From Beyond Numbers (2025) · cites this paper as Kitzinger, 1995

  • The 'educational alliance' conceptual model describes a supportive educational relationship upheld by the alignment of values and learning intentions.

    “The ' educational alliance ' conceptual model describes a supportive educational relationship upheld by the alignment of values and learning intentions. 33”
  • The learner's perception of the educational relationship between the educator and the learner is the key determinant of the educational alliance's success.

    “The learner's perception of the educational relationship between the educator and the learner is the key determinant of the educational alliance's success . 32-34”
  • Using the framework of the 'educational alliance,' Telio et al conceptualize feedback as a process of 'negotiation' within which both parties share a mutual understanding of the learner's goals as well as an agreement on responsibilities for reaching those goals.

    “Using the framework of the ' educational alliance, ' they conceptualize feedback as a process of 'negotiation' within which both parties share a mutual understanding of the lear ner's goals as well as an agreement on responsibilities for reaching those goals. 33”
  • Core principles from the therapeutic alliance form the educational alliance and are underpinned by a mutual understanding of purpose.

    “Core principles from the therapeutic alliance form the educational alliance and are underpinned by a mutual understanding of purpose. 33,45”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitzinger, J.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Kitzinger, Jenny
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1995-07-29
Volume
311
Issue
7000
Pages
299-302
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2104971230
Cited by
6,939
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 312 · 2025: 279 · 2024: 328 · 2023: 295 · 2022: 286 · 2021: 361 · 2020: 401 · 2019: 385 · 2018: 329 · 2017: 367 · 2016: 361 · 2015: 366 · 2014: 370 · 2013: 331 · 2012: 371
FWCI
103.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
focus groups, group composition, group facilitation, qualitative data analysis, health research, medical research, participant recruitment
MeSH terms
Communication, United Kingdom, Group Processes, Health Services Research, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review