Cited by 18Vibrio bacteria research studiesInfections and bacterial resistanceBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Rapidly developing and fatal Vibrio vulnificus wound infection

Open access
Baker-Austin, Craig, Oliver, James D.·2016·IDCases

Abstract

A 59 year old male presented at a hospital in September 2013 with a painful blister and significant associated erythema on his right ankle (Fig. 1). The patient complained of an acute burning sensation emanating from his lower ankle. The patient attributed the infection to a possible insect bite, which had subsequently been exposed to seawater during a fishing excursion in the Gulf of Mexico, USA. The infection rapidly progressed (4 h and 15 min between panel A and B), with extensive swelling and erythema of the lesion evident. The patient’s condition subsequently deteriorated, with a rapid and progressive spreading of fluid-filled bullae over the majority of his body surface. Despite aggressive treatment with the antibacterial agents doxycycline, ceftazimide, and clindamycin the patient succumbed to the infection approximately 28 h after admission to hospital. The Gram-negative bacterium Vibrio vulnificus was subsequently isolated. It should be noted that the individual did not have obvious underlying medical conditions, which make this a particularly noteworthy and unusual case.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.idcr.2016.07.014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • V. vulnificus is considered one of the most dangerous foodborne pathogens for humans.

    “Due to its capacity to cause rapid death among high-risk populations, V. vulnificus is considered one of the most dangerous foodborne pathogens for humans (Baker-Austin & Oliver, 2016;Oliver, 2005).”

    From <i>Vibrio vulnificus</i>in aquariums is a novel threat to marine mammals and public health (2018) · cites this paper as Baker-Austin & Oliver, 2016

    The paper’s discussion (page unavailable) reports that V. vulnificus wound infections can progress rapidly, have approximately 20% mortality, and warrant particular attention in patients with diabetes, immune disorders, or liver dysfunction. It does not describe V. vulnificus as a foodborne pathogen or rank it among the most dangerous foodborne pathogens for humans. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker-Austin, C., & Oliver, J. D.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Venue
IDCases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016
Volume
6
Pages
13
ISSN
2214-2509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2513538461
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IDCases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Vibrio bacteria research studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Infections and bacterial resistance
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
Vibrio vulnificus, wound infection, necrotizing fasciitis, bullae, insect bites, seawater exposure, Gulf of Mexico, doxycycline, clindamycin, fatal outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review