Cited by 24Vibrio bacteria research studiesAquaculture disease management and microbiotaInfections and bacterial resistance

Vibrio vulnificus in aquariums is a novel threat to marine mammals and public health

Open access
Li, Meng, Zhao, Lin, Ma, Jiajun, Zhao, Na, Luo, Jing, Wang, Chengmin, Chen, Lin, Ma, Guoyao +2 more·2018·Transboundary and Emerging Diseases

Abstract

Vibrio vulnificus is a Gram-negative, curved, obligate halophilic marine bacterium that exclusively exists in coastal seawaters. Previous studies revealed that V. vulnificus is one of the most dangerous foodborne zoonotic pathogens for human beings. However, it remains unknown whether marine mammals can be infected by V. vulnificus. In May 2016, a captive spotted seal (Phoca largha) died due to septicemia induced by V. vulnificus. Upon post-mortem examination, V. vulnificus was isolated, identified, and named as BJ-PH01. Further analysis showed that BJ-PH01 belongs to biotype 1 and the Clinical genotype. Furthermore, we performed an epidemiological investigation of V. vulnificus in six aquariums in northern China. As a result, V. vulnificus was successfully isolated from all investigated aquariums. The positive rates ranged from 20% to 100% in each investigated aquarium. During the investigation, 12 strains of V. vulnificus were isolated, and all 12 isolates were classified into biotype 1. Eleven of the 12 isolates belonged to the Clinical genotype, and one isolate belonged to the Environmental genotype. All 12 isolated V. vulnificus strains showed limited antibiotic resistance. Overall, our work demonstrated that V. vulnificus is frequently distributed in aquariums, thus constituting a threat to captive marine mammals and to public health.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A captive spotted seal died from *Vibrio vulnificus* septicemia, and subsequent sampling found *V. vulnificus* in all six investigated aquariums in northern China. The authors conclude that aquarium *V. vulnificus* poses a threat to captive marine mammals and public health.

Key findings

  • A captive spotted seal (*Phoca largha*) died in May 2016 due to septicemia induced by *V. vulnificus*; the isolate BJ-PH01 was recovered from fester, blood, lung, liver, intestine, and spleen, and no known viral pathogens were detected.
  • In six aquariums in northern China, *V. vulnificus* was isolated from all six; among 54 samples, the average positive rate was 44.4%, ranging from 20% to 100% per aquarium, and 12 strains were isolated.
  • All 12 isolates were biotype 1; 11 of 12 belonged to the Clinical genotype and 1 to the Environmental genotype; all were positive for *ary*, *mtlABC*, and *nanA*, and all were sensitive to levofloxacin, tetracycline, piperacillin, and gentamicin, with no drug-resistant isolates.
  • In mice, the median lethal dose of BJ-PH01 was 3.16 × 10⁵ CFU; infected mice showed severe hemorrhage, lung and intestinal edema/hemorrhage, and *V. vulnificus* was re-isolated from dead mice.

Methods

  • Post-mortem and microbiological analysis of the dead seal: tissue samples cultured on blood, MacConkey, chocolate, and TCBS agar; colonies identified by 16S rDNA sequencing, BD Phoenix system, and species-specific PCR; viral PCR tested for type A influenza virus, phocine distemper virus, coronavirus, and rotavirus.
  • Epidemiological investigation: 54 water and animal body-surface swab samples from six aquariums in northern China, with freshwater samples as negative controls; processed per FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual using APW enrichment, blood agar culture, *vvhA* PCR, 16S rDNA sequencing, and BD Phoenix.
  • Isolate characterization: biotyping by biochemical tests; genotyping by PCR for *vcg*, *serE*, *cps*, *bt2*, *ary*, *mtlABC*, and *nanA*; antibiotic susceptibility by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion; mouse infection with BJ-PH01 via intraperitoneal or intramuscular injection in 6-week-old female BALB/c mice (n = 4 per group).

Limitations

  • Stated: the authors could not perform Koch’s postulates because they could not confirm infection using a healthy seal; typical clinical manifestations in infected seals are poorly understood, and diagnosis relied mainly on detection/isolation from visceral tissues and blood.
  • Stated: risk assessment is difficult because *V. vulnificus* is opportunistic and requires predisposing factors, the minimum infectious dose is poorly understood even in humans, and the interface between *V. vulnificus* and wild marine mammals has never been studied.
  • Evident from the text: the epidemiological sample is small (54 samples, 12 isolates) and geographically limited to six aquariums in northern China; no marine mammal challenge experiment was performed, and the mouse model may not fully reflect seal or human disease.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tbed.12967

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

10 of 18 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Oral ingestion of contaminated raw or uncooked seafood mainly leads to primary septicemia.

    “Oral ingestion mainly leads to primary septicemia when people consume contaminated raw or uncooked seafood (Kim, Bae, Ma, & Kim, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kim, Bae, Ma, & Kim, 2015 source

      The Background reports severe septicemia after the patient ingested raw seafood, supporting the link between ingestion and septicemia. It does not say that oral ingestion mainly leads to primary septicemia; the Conclusions describe this patient's peritonitis as preceding her septicemia. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The ary gene is associated with virulence of clinical strains by providing sulfur within the host, thus providing an immune evasion approach.

    “The ary gene has been demonstrated to be associated with virulence of clinical strains by providing a pathogen with sulfur within the host, thus providing an immune evasion approach (Morrison et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Morrison et al., 2012 source

      The Results and Discussion section, under “Arylsulfatases” (page unavailable), reports that an arylsulfatase gene cluster distinguishes clinical C-genotype from environmental E-genotype strains and that the enzymes release sulfate. It suggests the cluster may aid survival in the sulfur-limited human gut, but does not demonstrate that it causes virulence or describe immune evasion. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    V. vulnificus can survive under nutrient starvation in seawater for years without losing its pathogenic potential for animals and humans.

    “Previous studies have demonstrated that V. vulnificus can survive under nutrient starvation in seawater for years without losing its pathogenic potential for animals and humans (Marco-Noales, Biosca, & Amaro, 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marco-Noales, Biosca, & Amaro, 1999 source
  • Findingown data

    BJ-PH01 grew opaque colonies on blood agar.

    “As shown in Figure 2b, the V. vulnificus isolate BJ-PH01 grew opaque colonies on blood agar.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    BJ-PH01 belongs to the Clinical genotype.

    “Further analysis showed that BJ-PH01 belongs to biotype 1 and the Clinical genotype.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
  • May combine two claims. 4
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wound infection is generally acquired through exposure of a preexisting wound to contaminated seawater or shellfish, resulting in fulminant necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections.

    “Wound infection is generally acquired through the exposure of a preexisting wound to contaminated seawater or shellfish, resulting in fulminant necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (Huang et al., 2016;Kotton, Soboh, & Bisharat, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Huang et al., 2016 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says V. vulnificus in seawater can cause necrotizing infections following traumatic injuries and describes necrotizing skin and soft-tissue infections as fulminant. It identifies shellfish as a habitat for the bacterium, but describes contaminated-oyster exposure through ingestion, not through contact with a preexisting wound. It also does not establish that wound infection is generally acquired by the route claimed. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Kotton, Soboh, & Bisharat, 2015 source

      The Introduction says wound infections follow injury before or during exposure to seawater or marine animals, and that necrotizing fasciitis can be a rapidly progressive complication. The claim narrows the injury to a preexisting wound and implies that wound infection results in necrotizing infection, whereas the source says necrotizing fasciitis can occur. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    V. vulnificus is considered one of the most dangerous foodborne pathogens for humans.

    “Due to its capacity to cause rapid death among high-risk populations, V. vulnificus is considered one of the most dangerous foodborne pathogens for humans (Baker-Austin & Oliver, 2016;Oliver, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Baker-Austin & Oliver, 2016 source

      The paper’s discussion (page unavailable) reports that V. vulnificus wound infections can progress rapidly, have approximately 20% mortality, and warrant particular attention in patients with diabetes, immune disorders, or liver dysfunction. It does not describe V. vulnificus as a foodborne pathogen or rank it among the most dangerous foodborne pathogens for humans. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Oliver, 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Males are more susceptible to V. vulnificus than females.

    “Moreover, males are more susceptible than females (Ito et al., 2012), perhaps due to the role of estrogen in protecting against the bacterium's endotoxins (Miyamoto et al., 1999;Soucy, Boivin, Labrie, & Rivest, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ito et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several other risk factors contribute to the high pathogenicity of V. vulnificus in humans, such as capsule, iron, and the vcg gene.

    “Several other risk factors contribute to the high pathogenicity of V. vulnificus in humans, such as capsule, iron, and the vcg gene (Jones & Oliver, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jones & Oliver, 2009 source

      The opening overview identifies capsular polysaccharide expression and iron acquisition as virulence factors, and IRON ACQUISITION describes the association between serum iron and disease. BIOTYPES AND GENOTYPES calls vcg a “virulence-correlated gene” whose variants correlate with clinical versus environmental isolation; it does not establish that the gene itself contributes to pathogenicity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The nanA gene is involved in sialic acid metabolism and is essential for V. vulnificus virulence.

    “The nanA gene has been demonstrated to be involved in sialic acid metabolism and is essential for V. vulnificus virulence (Kim, Hwang, Kim, & Choi, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kim, Hwang, Kim, & Choi, 2011 source

      The Results identify NanA as involved in catabolic degradation of Neu5Ac, a sialic acid. The paper’s introductory passage (page unavailable) reports that a V. vulnificus nanA mutant had significantly diminished virulence in a mouse model, but that does not establish that nanA is essential for virulence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The median lethal dose of BJ-PH01 in mice was 3.16 × 10^5 CFU.

    “In our research, we found that the median lethal dose of isolated V. vulnificus BJ-PH01 was 3.16 × 10 5 CFU.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    V. vulnificus causes human infection through oral ingestion and wound infection.

    “Vibrio vulnificus causes human infection through oral ingestion and wound infection (Kashimoto et al., 2015;Madiyal et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kashimoto et al., 2015 source
    • cites Madiyal et al., 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Patients with underlying chronic diseases including alcoholism, diabetes, cancer, or renal diseases are more susceptible to V. vulnificus.

    “As mentioned previously, patients with underlying chronic diseases, including alcoholism, diabetes, cancer, or renal diseases, are more susceptible to V. vulnificus (Bross, Soch, Morales, & Mitchell, 2007a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bross, Soch, Morales, & Mitchell, 2007a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The identification of V. vulnificus was confirmed by 16S rDNA sequencing, vvhA gene-specific PCR, BD Phoenix system, and SEM analysis.

    “The result was confirmed by 16S rDNA sequencing, V. vulnificus vvhA (cytolysin/hemolysin) gene-specific PCR amplification (Figure 2c), the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System, and electron scanning microscope (SEM) analysis (Figure 2d).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The typical clinical manifestations of V. vulnificus infected seals are poorly understood due to limited background information.

    “Due to limited background information, the typical clinical manifestations of V. vulnificus infected seals are poorly understood.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Susceptibility tests were conducted by the Kirby-Bauer method according to NCCLS recommendations.

    “Susceptibility tests were conducted by the Kirby-Bauer method according to the recommendations of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (M45)(Clinical & institute, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Clinical & institute, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    It is difficult to eliminate V. vulnificus without scientific measures.

    “Thus, it is difficult to eliminate V. vulnificus without scientific measures, and it is necessary to take measures to control the water quality in aquariums.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The study used FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual procedures for sample examination.

    “All samples were examined using procedures in the Bacteriological Analytical Manual of The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Kaysner & DePaola, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kaysner & DePaola, 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

    “This study was evaluated and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
14 of 14
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    V. vulnificus can only affect humans and other primates.

    “Previous reports indicated that V. vulnificus can only affect humans and other primates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is an overlap in the distributions of V. vulnificus and marine mammals.

    “There is an overlap in the distributions of V. vulnificus and marine mammals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No evidence has shown that marine mammals can be infected by V. vulnificus.

    “No evidence has shown that marine mammals can be infected by V. vulnificus; however, the concerns cannot be excluded.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Possession of an antiphagocytic capsule is one of the absolute requirements for V. vulnificus virulence.

    “Possession of an antiphagocytic capsule is one of the absolute requirements for virulence.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Encapsulated V. vulnificus cells produce opaque colonies, and only opaque cells are able to utilize transferrin-bound iron.

    “Encapsulated cells produce opaque colonies, and only opaque cells are able to utilize transferrin-bound iron.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    V. vulnificus is an opportunistic pathogen, and one or more predisposing factors are required to initiate disease.

    “V. vulnificus is an opportunistic pathogen, and one or more predisposing factors are required to initiate disease;”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The minimum dose for V. vulnificus to cause an infection is poorly understood, even in humans.

    “the minimum dose for V. vulnificus to cause an infection is poorly understood, even in humans;”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The interface between V. vulnificus and marine mammals in the wild has never been studied.

    “the interface between V. vulnificus and marine mammals in the wild has never been studied.”
8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Ornithine decarboxylase results are described as positive but tabulated as negative

    Major

    The results text says every tested strain was positive, while the corresponding Table 3 row shows a minus sign for every strain.

  • BJ-PH01 is assigned conflicting genotypes

    Major

    The figure caption identifies BJ-PH01 as vcgE, whereas the genotype table assigns it vcg C.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bross, 2007b, Vibrio vulnificus infection: diagnosis and treatment, Diabetes, 35, 20

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Zhao, L., Ma, J., Zhao, N., Luo, J., Wang, C., Chen, L., Ma, G., Wang, Y., & He, H.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • National Animal Husbandry Service (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Hongxuan
Venue
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-26
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
1863-1871
ISSN
1865-1674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883127692
Cited by
24
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transboundary and Emerging Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • State Forestry Administration
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CZBZX-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Vibrio bacteria research studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Infections and bacterial resistance
Keywords
Vibrio vulnificus, aquariums, captive marine mammals, spotted seal, Phoca largha, septicemia, biotype 1, antibiotic resistance, zoonotic pathogens, public health risk, mariculture
MeSH terms
Waterborne Diseases, Animals, Animal Diseases, Animals, Zoo, China, Fishes, Genotype, Mammals, Public Health, Vibrio Infections, Water Microbiology, Vibrio vulnificus, Seals, Earless

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review