Cited by 83Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Predictors of compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction among emergency nurses: A cross-sectional survey

Yu, Hairong, Qiao, Anhua, Gui, Li·2021·International Emergency Nursing

Abstract

Background Challenging emergency caring situations can contribute to compassion fatigue and burnout among emergency nurses. These variables have been widely researched, although not among Chinese nurses. Pertinent findings will extend the international literature in this domain. Aims This study aimed to develop and test a model that delineates the predictive relationship that empathy, self-compassion, job satisfaction, individual and work-related factors share with compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction. Methods A cross-sectional survey design was adopted. Data were collected from 186 emergency nurses recruited from eight hospitals across six cities in China. Descriptive statistics were computed, and univariate and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted. Results Empathy, job satisfaction, and self-compassion explained a substantial proportion of the variance in compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction. Factors related to life disruption and traumatic memories significantly predicted compassion fatigue and burnout. The final model included the following predictors: prior history of a severe illness, perspective taking, compassionate care, employee engagement, mindfulness, self-judgement, and over-identification. Conclusions Stress involved in providing emergency care may increase emotional and work-related burden among emergency nurses. Organisations should design interventions that nurture empathy, promote self-compassion, a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100961

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, H., Qiao, A., & Gui, L.
Affiliations
Second Military Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gui, Li
Venue
International Emergency Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
55
Pages
100961
ISSN
1755-599X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120790367
Cited by
83
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6
FWCI
13.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Emergency Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Youth Programme of National Natural Science Foundation of China (71904199)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
compassion fatigue, burnout, compassion satisfaction, emergency department nurses, empathy, self-compassion, job satisfaction, life disruption, traumatic memory, perspective taking, compassionate care, employee engagement, mindfulness, self-judgment, over-identification, occupational stress, Chinese nurses
MeSH terms
Compassion Fatigue, Burnout, Professional, Cross-Sectional Studies, Empathy, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Nurses, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review