Cited by 63Microbial Inactivation MethodsPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics

Effect of high-pressure carbon dioxide on the aggregation and conformational changes of polyphenol oxidase from apple (Malus domestica) juice

Murtaza, Ayesha, Iqbal, Aamir, Linhu, Zhu, Liu, Yan, Xu, Xiaoyun, Pan, Siyi, Hu, Wanfeng·2019·Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of different states of CO2 on the activity and structural modification of purified polyphenol oxidase (PPO) from apple juice. CO2 in critical and supercritical states strongly inhibited the PPO activity up to 64.88% and 3.20%, respectively. Dynamic light scattering analysis showed that the two peaks depolymerised into three peaks in the critical state, demonstrating the dissociation and aggregation of small particles. Circular dichroism analysis revealed that the secondary structure deformed because of the loss of α-helix contents in the critical and super critical CO2 states. Fluorescence intensity dramatically decreased to 251.3 (λmax 312) in the critical state, showing unfolding of PPO molecules thereby resulting in quenching and blue shifting of λmax. Electrophoresis indicated that large molecular aggregates did not run into the gel at supercritical state. Hence, HP-CO2 treatment in critical and super critical states could induce the aggregation, deformation and structural changes which might be the causes of PPO inactivation.“Polyphenol oxidation (PPO) is the enzyme that initiates the browning reaction and deteriorates the quality of fruit juices”. High pressure carbon dioxide (HP-CO2) technology is a promising technique to obtain high quality apple juices with low enzyme activity. This study analyzed the effects of different states of carbon dioxide gases under HPCD on the activity, aggregation, deformation and structural changes of PPO from apple juice. Available findings provided in this study will benefit the food industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.03.001

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murtaza, A., Iqbal, A., Linhu, Z., Liu, Y., Xu, X., Pan, S., & Hu, W.
Affiliations
Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Hu, Wanfeng
Venue
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
54
Pages
43-50
ISSN
1466-8564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922059589
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University (2662018JC018)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401507)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Keywords
polyphenol oxidase, high-pressure CO2, supercritical carbon dioxide, enzyme inactivation, protein aggregation, protein conformational change, apple juice, browning reaction, protein unfolding, alpha-helix loss, fluorescence quenching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review