Cited by 32Proteins in Food SystemsFood and Agricultural SciencesPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics

Structural modification of plum (Prunus domestica L) kernel protein isolate by supercritical carbon-dioxide treatment: Functional properties and in-vitro protein digestibility

Sheikh, Mohd Aaqib, Saini, Charanjiv Singh, Sharma, Harish Kumar·2023·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Abstract

The effect of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO 2) treatment at different processing temperatures (30-70 °C) on the physico-functional properties, structural features, and in-vitro digestibility (IVPD) of plum kernel protein isolates (PKPI) was examined. The results revealed remarkable changes in the secondary structures of SC-CO 2-treated PKPIs, including a decrease in α-helix proportion, a concomitant increase in β-sheet content, and a considerable variation in random coils and β-turn structures. The temperature rise increased the negative zeta potential to a maximum of 31.35 mV at 60 °C, exhibiting the colloidal stability of PKPI dispersions. SDS-PAGE analysis showed variations in the intensities of protein bands, indicating denaturation and aggregation at higher temperatures. These structural and molecular changes improved water-binding capacity (1.22-fold) and oil binding capacity (1.11-fold), wettability (1.12-fold), and the highest value in all the properties was recorded at 60 °C. Moreover, the highest IVPD value (21.58 %) and a distinguishable colour difference (∆E) of 8.11 was also obtained at 60 °C of the processing temperature. Therefore, SC-CO 2 treatment-induced modification of PKPI contributed to the enhanced digestibility and techno-functional properties, which offered new prospects to extend its use in food applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.123128

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheikh, M. A., Saini, C. S., & Sharma, H. K.
Affiliations
  • Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology (IN)
  • National Institute of Technology Agartala (IN)
Corresponding author
Sheikh, Mohd Aaqib
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
230
Pages
123128
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313559546
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indian Council of Medical Research (2019-5058)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Keywords
plum, supercritical carbon dioxide treatment, protein structure modification, in vitro protein digestibility, protein secondary structure, zeta potential, colloidal stability, water holding capacity, oil absorption capacity, wettability, processing temperature
MeSH terms
Prunus domestica, Carbon Dioxide, Hot Temperature, Temperature, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review