The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of edible insect proteins in food: Challenges and issues related to their functional properties
Abstract
Abstract Over the past decade, the potential of edible insects as a novel ingredient in high value-added products has been investigated to find alternatives to conventional protein sources that are expensive, over-exploited and harmful to the environment. This review assesses the state of insects as an alternative protein source from production to consumption. More specifically, this review details the conventional procedures related to the production of insect flours as well as insect-derived ingredients such as protein concentrates and isolates. As a source of alternative protein in food ingredient formulations, the available data on the functionalities of edible insect ingredients is also examined and compared to conventional animal- and plant-based protein sources. Finally, the major challenges facing entomophagy in the mainstream food industry are explored. This review highlights the fact that insect proteins can serve as functional ingredients in food preparation. However, additional comparative studies are required to assess the functionality of various insect proteins compared to conventional proteins, regardless of processing method. To be incorporated into large scale industries, more research is needed to optimize processing methods to obtain the best compromise between cost-effectiveness, functionality, tastiness and sustainability, while ensuring consumer safety.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abeyrathne, E. D. N. S., Lee, H. Y., & Ahn, D. U. (2013) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2013-03391 · Cited by 532
Kramer, R. M., Shende, V. R., Motl, N., Pace, C. N., & Scholtz, J. M. (2012) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2012.01.060 · Cited by 418
Sarwar, G. (1997) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/127.5.758 · Cited by 205
Cited by
Current insights into protein solubility: A review of its importance for alternative proteins
Grossmann, L., & McClements, D. J. (2023) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108416 · Cited by 367
Abedini, A., Sohrabvandi, S., Sadighara, P., Hosseini, H., Farhoodi, M., Assadpour, E., Alizadeh Sani, M., Zhang, F., Seyyedi-Mansour, S., & Jafari, S. M. (2024) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2024.103181 · Cited by 71
Gürbüz, B. N., Pastrana, L. M., Pereira, R. N., & Cerqueira, M. A. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14030498 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Gravel, A., & Doyen, A.
- Venue
- Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 102272
- ISSN
- 1466-8564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991676845
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of edible insect proteins in food: Challenges and issues related to their functional properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102272
- The paper
- Gravel, A., & Doyen, A. (2020). The use of edible insect proteins in food: Challenges and issues related to their functional properties. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.