Cited by 106Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing SystemsIndustrial Automation and Control SystemsDigital Transformation in Industry

A methodology for the selection of industrial robots in food handling

Open access
Bader, Farah, Rahimifard, Shahin·2020·Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

Abstract

As the global population continues to rise and consumer demand for a wider variety of food products increases, food manufacturers are exploring various strategies, methods and tools to change and adapt. Furthermore, restriction in access to low-cost labour and introduction of more stringent legislation are forcing the food industry to update their production processes. Industrial robots, a pillar of Industry 4.0, promises many benefits to the food manufacturing industry, especially in responding to these new challenges. The integration of such automation into food manufacturing has been a slow process in comparison to other manufacturing sectors and has largely been limited to packaging and palletising. This research aims to improve the application of industrial robots within food manufacturing through definition of a methodology for the identification of a flexible automation solution for a specific production requirement. The paper explores the four steps within the Food Industrial Robot Methodology (FIRM), through which users define, classify and identify their foodstuff and automation solution. The application of FIRM is exemplified through an industrial case study to support food manufacturers investigating the potential benefits of utilising industrial robots within their production systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102379

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This work also identified many factors that should lay the groundwork for future research in the application of industrial robots within food manufacturing.

    “This work also identified many factors that should lay the groundwork for future research in the application of industrial robots within food manufacturing.”
  • The FIRM presented in this paper outlined the ability to classify industrial robot capabilities and match them to specific characteristics of foodstuffs and requirements for their processing based on four steps that navigate eight tasks.

    “The FIRM presented in this paper outlined the ability to classify industrial robot capabilities and match them to specific characteristics of foodstuffs and requirements for their processing based on four steps that navigate eight tasks.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Alcácer, V., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2019). Scanning the industry 4.0: A literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 22(3), 899-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.006. · DOI
  2. Bader, F., & Rahimifard, S. (2018). Challenges for industrial robot applications in food manufacturing. Proceedings ISCSIC'18 (pp. 1-8). ACM Digital Library. https://doi. org/10.1145/3284557.3284723. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Blanes, C., Mellado, M., Ortiz, C., & Valera, A. (2011). Review. Technologies for robot grippers in pick and place operations for fresh fruits and vegetables. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(4), 1130. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/20110904-501-10. · DOI
  4. Caldwell, D. G. (2013). Robotics and automation in the food industry. In S. Whitworth (Ed.). Robotics and automation in the food industry(1st ed.). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857095763.2.267. · DOI
  5. Chua, P., Ilschner, T., Caldwell, D., et al. (2003). Robotic manipulation of food products - a review. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 30(4), 345-354. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/01439910310479612. · DOI
  6. Demartini, M., Pinna, C., Tonelli, F., Terzi, S., Sansone, C., & Testa, C. (2018). Food industry digitalization: From challenges and trends to opportunities and solutions. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1371-1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08. 337. · DOI
  7. Groover, M. P. (2016). In S. Holly, & R. Sandra (Eds.). Automation, production systems, and computer-integrated manufacturing(4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.
  8. Iqbal, J., Khan, Z. H., & Khalid, A. (2017). Prospects of robotics in food industry. Food Science and Technology, 37(2), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.14616. · DOI
  9. Jazar, R. N. (2007). Theory of applied robotics; kinematics, dynamics, and control (1st ed.). Springer UShttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68964-7. · DOI
  10. Li, P., & Liu, X. (2019). Common sensors in industrial robots: A review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series AIACTIOP Publishinghttps://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1267/1/ 012036. · DOI
  11. Lien, T. K. (2013). Gripper technologies for food industry robots. Robotics and Automation in the Food Industry, 143-170. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857095763.1.143. · DOI
  12. Mueller, M., Kuhlenkoetter, B., & Nassmacher, R. (2014). Robots in food industry chal- lenges and chances. ISR/Robotik 2014 (pp. 232-238). Berlin: VDE VERLAG GMBH.
  13. Nayik, G. A. (2015). Robotics and food technology: A mini review. Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences, 5(4), https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9600.1000384. · DOI
  14. Rachana, K., Polson, R., & Saraswathy, K. (2017). Robotics and automation in meat processing. International Journsl of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 7(9), Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d682/ 6ea59db46a98d335ee14359a17e414b495f2.pdf.
  15. Salvietti, G., Iqbal, Z., Malvezzi, M., Eslami, T., & Prattichizzo, D. (2019). Soft hands with embodied constraints: The soft ScoopGripper. Proceedings -IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2019-May(May) (pp. 2758-2764). . https:// doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793563. · DOI
  16. Wilson, M. (2010). Developments in robot applications for food manufacturing. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 37(6), 498-502. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 01439911011081632. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bader, F., & Rahimifard, S.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bader, Farah
Venue
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
64
Pages
102379
ISSN
1466-8564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024930237
Cited by
106
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
industrial robots, food handling, food manufacturing, flexible automation, Industry 4.0, food packaging automation, cheap labor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review