Blended teacher professional development: A synthesis of three program evaluations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Blended learning designs mean that professional development programs for teachers can be integrated into the local context of their school.
“Blended learning designs mean that professional development programs for teachers can be integrated into the local context in which teachers work, their school (Owston et al., 2008).”
From Using personalized support & school-based study groups to increase teachers’ participation in MOOCs: Findings from two European pilot projects (2021) · cites this paper as Owston et al., 2008
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · see citing works
Gibbs, G. (2007) · doi:10.4135/9781849208574 · Cited by 4,299 · see citing works
Strong community, deep learning: exploring the link
Chapman, C., Ramondt, L., & Smiley, G. (2005) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/01587910500167910 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hertz, B., & Engelhardt, K. (2021) · IUL Research · doi:10.57568/iulres.v2i3.123 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Owston, R., Wideman, H., Murphy, J., & Lupshenyuk, D.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Owston, Ron
- ORCID
- Owston, Ron
- Venue
- The Internet and Higher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 201-210
- ISSN
- 1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118980726
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 21.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Internet and Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- blended learning, teacher professional development, program evaluation, situated design, teacher collaboration, teacher practice change, learning outcomes, on-the-job learning, teacher communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
