Using personalized support & school-based study groups to increase teachers’ participation in MOOCs: Findings from two European pilot projects
Open accessAbstract
There is little doubt that online training formats and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in particular have the potential to increase accessibility for training educators and address some challenges reported by teachers in being able to access relevant professional development (OECD, 2019). However, pre-pandemic data shows that participation in online training is not yet widespread amongst teachers (OECD, 2019). This paper therefore explores two mechanisms that could potentially increase teachers’ participation in MOOCs: an offer of personalized support during a MOOC and the provision of school-based study groups. Evidence of the implementation of a personalized support in field trials has demonstrated substantial impact on teachers’ participation in MOOCs, with 42% of the test group completing a series of MOOCs versus only 32% of the control group. Results from a small pilot program focusing on the use of school-based study groups are more tentative but suggest that a school-based blended learning model that makes use of study groups has the potential to increase participation in MOOCs by engaging teachers who would not have previously considered enrolling to a MOOC and building teachers’ competence and confidence levels so that they are able to start and complete a MOOC.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper examines two mechanisms for increasing teachers’ participation in MOOCs: personalized support during courses and school-based study groups. Personalized support showed a substantial completion effect in field trials, while the school-based study-group pilot gave tentative evidence of increased participation and confidence.
Key findings
- In the TeachUP field trials, the personalized support offer increased the likelihood of enrolled teachers completing an online course by 10 percentage points: 42% of the treatment group completed the TeachUP courses versus 32% of the control group. For student teachers, the support increased completion only for those with prior experience in online courses, and no effect was observed in Turkey.
- Very few participants accepted the offer of a one-to-one online session: 57 in total.
- In the Teacher Academy study-group pilot, 8 teachers organized school-based study groups; group sizes varied from 5 to 30 teachers, and among teachers who attended the first study group session, between 80% and 100% also attended the last session and completed the associated MOOC.
- The pilot teachers reported four key findings: peer support and fixed timing were major benefits; study groups built confidence to engage in the online course community; they built confidence to take further online courses; and they generated a school learning community that extended beyond the MOOC.
Methods
- TeachUP policy experimentation: during the 2018/2019 school year, personalized support was tested in field trials across four scalable online courses in 10 countries (Austria, Hungary, Greece, Estonia, Malta, Lithuania, Portugal, Spain, Slovakia, Turkey). Participants were 4,090 randomly sampled lower-secondary in-service teachers (2,192) and student teachers (1,898). The study compared a test group receiving personalized emails and an offer of support with a control group, using baseline and follow-up surveys, short post-course surveys, course platform data, and qualitative feedback from stakeholders and focus groups.
- Teacher Academy school-based study groups pilot: launched in 2019 with 8 teachers from across Europe, who organized study groups in their schools alongside a Teacher Academy MOOC. Teachers recorded planning and observations via an action plan template and learning diaries, prepared an online publication, and were interviewed; no systematic evaluation of study group participants themselves was undertaken.
Limitations
- Stated for the study-group pilot: the evidence is limited by the low number of cases, lack of representativeness, and limits in the research design. The paper also states that no systematic evaluation of study group participants was undertaken and that it is unclear to what extent collaboration was maintained longer term.
- Stated for personalized support: it is not possible to provide a conclusive answer to how the support offer actually worked; it did not work for everyone; future research is needed on contextual and learner characteristics; and any support offered entirely online may not reach teachers who do not register for MOOCs or lack basic digital competences.
- Evident from the text: the study-group findings rely on pilot teachers’ diaries, online publications, interviews, and participant quotes rather than a controlled comparison, and the TeachUP effects were heterogeneous across groups and countries.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
8 of 28 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The pilot findings on peer support correspond with literature conclusions about the importance of creating community support infrastructures to mitigate the isolation felt by many teachers in purely online courses.
“These findings correspond with the conclusions found in the literature about the importance to create community support infrastructures to mitigate the isolation felt by many teachers in purely online courses (Hoffmann-Dumienski, 2016;Hramiak, 2010;Trust & Horrocks, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Hoffmann-Dumienski, 2016 source
The “Support and the importance of online participation” section says the facilitators’ online community reduced feelings of remoteness and isolation. The “Implications and recommendations” section suggests this may inform online professional development elsewhere, but the study concerns facilitators in blended-learning settings on remote South Pacific islands, not teachers in purely online courses generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Hramiak, 2010 source
- cites Trust & Horrocks, 2017 source
- Findingown data
The personalized support offer increased the likelihood of enrolled teachers to complete an online course by ten percentage points.
“One key finding was that the personalized support offer increased the likelihood of enrolled teachers to complete an online course by ten percentage points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For student teachers, the support offer increased the likelihood to complete the courses only for those with prior experience in online courses (completed more than one online course per year in the past three years).
“For student teachers, the support offer increased the likelihood to complete the courses only for those with prior experience in online courses (i.e. completed more than one online course per year in the past three years).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The personalized support offer increased completion: 42% of the test group completed a series of MOOCs versus 32% of the control group.
“Evidence of the implementation of a personalized support in field trials has demonstrated substantial impact on teachers' participation in MOOCs, with 42% of the test group completing a series of MOOCs versus only 32% of the control group.”
- Also stated in: § 2.3. TeachUP findings · plain
“42% in the treatment group completed the TeachUP courses, compared to 32% in the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 2.3. TeachUP findings · plain
- Findingown data
No effect of personalized support on completion was observed for teachers and student teachers in Turkey.
“No effect could be observed for teachers and student teachers in Turkey.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingnone given
Evidence from the implementation of personalized support in field trials has demonstrated substantial impact on teachers' participation in MOOCs.
“Evidence of the implementation of a personalized support in field trials has demonstrated substantial impact on teachers' participation in MOOCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Based on participant feedback, the added value of the study groups came more from the peer support offered during the sessions and the fixed date and time reserved for work on the MOOC than from other aspects.
“Based on the feedback provided, the added value to the participants seems to have come more from the peer support offered during the sessions as well as the fixed date and time reserved for the work on the MOOC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Collaboration extended beyond the study group sessions, for example resulting in open door lessons where study group participants were invited to drop in to each other's lessons for observation.
“Furthermore, collaboration extended beyond the study group sessions, for example resulting in “open door lessons” where study group participants were invited to drop-in to each other's lessons for observation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A major benefit to study group participants was the ability to take the MOOC together during the study group sessions.
“A major benefit to the participants of the study groups was the ability to take the MOOC together during the study group sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Study group participants reported that the language and technical support offered by their peers made them more confident to post online.
“Study group participants reported that the language and technical support offered by their peers made them more confident to post online -for example by demonstrating how to use Google Translate or proof-reading a post before publication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Study group participants reported that as a result of their participation they felt more confident to participate in other online courses.
“Study group participants reported that as a result of their participation they felt more confident to participate in other online courses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participation in the study group sessions gave participants confidence to engage in the online discussions and exchanges taking place in the course community.
“The participation in the study group sessions gave participants confidence to engage in the online discussions and exchanges that were taking place in the course community.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is likely that what made the difference was the fact that messages were personalized by including information about participants' profile and progress.
“It is likely that what made the difference was the fact that messages were personalized by including information about participants' profile and progress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
External factors such as lack of time, unexpected events, and distractions affect course completion.
“Course completion is also affected by external factors that participants need to navigate in order to succeed; for example, lack of time, unexpected events and distractions (Kember, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kember, 1995
- Interpretationown data
A personalized support offer can increase teachers' participation in MOOCs.
“In conclusion, a personalized support offer can increase teachers' participation in MOOCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Participation in online training is not yet widespread amongst teachers (pre-pandemic).
“However, prepandemic data shows that participation in online training is not yet widespread amongst teachers (OECD, 2019).”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“However, pre-pandemic data shows that participation in online training is not yet widespread amongst teachers (OECD, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OECD, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Interpretationcitation
Qualitative evidence suggests that a set of different dynamics was at play in how the personalized support worked.
“However, qualitative evidence, for example from focus groups carried out in the field trials countries, suggests that a set of different dynamics was at play (Livingston, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Livingston, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Any support as part of a course will not reach teachers who do not register to online courses in the first place.
“Any support as part of a course will however not reach teachers that do not register to online courses in the first place, for example because they are not convinced of their usefulness or do not think of themselves as capable of succeeding at online learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The fact that the personalized support did not work for everyone points to the likely importance of background profiles, patterns of course participation, institutional setting and implementation processes.
“The fact that the personalized support did not work for everyone points to the likely importance of background profiles, patterns of course participation, institutional setting and implementation processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A blended approach in TPD can address the perceived shortcoming of fully online TPD, namely the creation of a sense of community among teachers.
“Many articles show how a blended approach in TPD can address one of the perceived shortcomings of fully online TPD, namely the creation of a sense of community among teachers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Help-seeking, an important component of self-regulated learning competence, seems to have been successfully activated through participation in the study groups.
“This suggests that an important component of self-regulated learning competence, help-seeking, seems to have been successfully activated through the study group participation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
School-based study groups that work alongside a MOOC have the potential to increase enrolment, starting and completion numbers for teachers on MOOCs.
“The 4 findings outlined above highlight how school-based study groups that work alongside a MOOC have the potential to increase enrolment, starting and completion numbers for teachers on MOOCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The nature of the evidence presented in the study groups pilot is limited due to the low number of cases, lack of representativeness, and limits in the research design applied.
“While these results seem promising, the nature of the evidence presented is limited due to the low number of cases, lack of representativeness, and limits in the research design applied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By strengthening participants' confidence and their ability to help themselves, and by offering fixed times to work on a MOOC, the study groups are likely to increase the likelihood of participants starting and completing a MOOC.
“Furthermore, by strengthening participants' confidence, their ability to help themselves, and by offering fixed times to work on a MOOC, the study groups are likely to increase the likelihood of participants starting and completing a MOOC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The pilot finding on confidence to engage online supports Chase et al. (2019)'s conclusion that participating in a blended model of learning with a MOOC can positively impact the wider course community by empowering learners who might not have engaged to start engaging with it.
“This finding supports the conclusions of Chase et al. (2019) that participating in a blended model of learning with a MOOC can have a positive impact on the wider course community as it empowers learners who might not have engaged in the online community to start engaging with it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chase et al. (2019)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The finding that study groups generated a learning community at school highlights the potential of a school-based blended learning model with MOOCs as an effective TPD format.
“This finding highlights the potential of a school-based blended learning model with MOOCs as an effective TPD format.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Teachers' communities that can offer support on an ongoing basis in a local context are an important component of impactful teacher professional development.
- Interpretationreasoning
The personalized support offer and the school-based blended learning model could complement each other well in addressing teachers' participation in MOOCs.
“To address teachers' participation in MOOCs, both mechanisms could complement each other well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 36
- May combine two claims. 21
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe importance of teachers building community as part of any TPD experience is acknowledged by most of the literature.
“The importance of teachers to build community as part of any TPD experience is acknowledged by most of the literature (Anderson, Boaler, & Dieckmann, 2018, Schleicher, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRobust evidence on what works for online support is limited and is not specifically focused on teachers.
“However, robust evidence on what works is limited and is not specifically focused on teachers (Kizilcec et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kizilcec et al., 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe plan making intervention increased short-term persistence but did not increase course completion.
“While this intervention increased shortterm persistence, it did not increase course completion, which was previously found (Yeomans and Reich, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationImpacts of such interventions could be highly heterogeneous across contexts and participant types, and support interventions should be targeted.
“Overall, the authors conclude that the impacts of such interventions could be highly heterogeneous across contexts, type of participants and that support interventions should be targeted and take those factors in due account.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kizilcec et al., 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe value-relevance intervention increased completion rates only in a subset of courses carried out in developing countries.
“This second intervention was found to increase completion rates only in a subset of courses carried out in developing countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kizilcec et al., 2020 source
The Results section reports increased completion for students in less-developed countries, but only in courses with a global achievement gap. The claim incorrectly describes the courses, rather than the students, as being in developing countries; our copy provides no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe mental contrasting with implementation intentions intervention increased completion rates only for students in individual countries.
“This intervention increased completion rates only for students in individual countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kizilcec et al., 2020 source
The Interventions and Prior Results section reports that earlier MCII trials increased completion for students in individualistic countries. But the Results section says this effect did not replicate in the present study, and an exploratory analysis found an increase for a different subgroup. The claim omits the prior-study qualification and overstates the effect as exclusive to that group. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBenefits of blended learning include the possibility to develop more meaningful activities because of the location within the site of professional practice.
“The benefits of blended learning therefore also include the possibility to develop more meaningful activities (Herrington et al., 2003) because of the location within the site of their professional practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Herrington et al., 2003 source
The ‘Authentic activities in learning environments’ section says that realistic, context-rich online tasks benefit learners, supporting the point that such activities can be more meaningful than decontextualised exercises. It does not establish this as a benefit of blended learning or attribute it to learners being located at a site of professional practice; the paper describes online environments that resemble real-world contexts. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe few questions put forward by participants regarded practical aspects of the courses rather than course contents.
“The few questions put forward by participants regarded practical aspects of the courses rather than course contents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVery few teachers and student teachers accepted the offer for an online 1:1 session (57 in total), and few replied to the more general offer of support.
“This impact was observed even though very few teachers and student teachers accepted the offer for an online 1:1 session (57 in total), and also few replied to the more general offer of support made in all personalized support emails.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAmongst teachers who came to the first study group session, between 80% and 100% also attended the last study group session and completed the MOOC the study group was associated with.
“Amongst those teachers who came to the first study group session, between 80% and 100% also attended the last study group session and completed the MOOC that the study group was associated with.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPilot teachers reported that exchanges amongst study group participants regularly addressed issues unrelated to the MOOC and that a key benefit of organizing the study groups was the collaborative culture it generated amongst school colleagues.
“Pilot teachers reported that exchanges amongst study group participants regularly addressed issues that were unrelated to the MOOC and that one of the key benefits of organizing the study groups had been the collaborative culture it generated amongst the school colleagues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe support study group teachers provided each other was focused particularly on language issues, although technical issues were also mentioned.
“Interestingly, the support the teachers provided each other was focused particularly on language issues, although technical issues were also mentioned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn the Teacher Academy study groups pilot, the study groups varied in size from 5 to 30 teachers.
“The study groups varied in size from 5 to 30 teachers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe increased confidence to take further online courses was primarily due to increased confidence in dealing with language issues and a better understanding of how an online course worked.
“According to the feedback received this was primarily due to increased confidence in dealing with language issues as well as a better understanding of how an online course worked.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBecause of the cross-curricular topics addressed by the MOOCs, the study groups included colleagues from different subject areas and facilitated exchange between them, which was far from common in many pilot schools.
“Due to the cross-curricular topics addressed by the MOOCs, the study groups included colleagues from different subject areas and facilitated an exchange between them -something that was far from common in many pilot schools.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLow expectations and lack of motivation affect completion rate in online courses.
“Studies often highlight the importance of a participant's low expectations (Pursel et al., 2016a) and a lack of motivation that affects their completion rate in online courses (Osborn, 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pursel et al., 2016a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Osborn, 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThere is little research available on the factors that affect teachers' enrolment, starting and completion of MOOCs or online learning in general.
“There is little research available on the factors that affect teachers' enrolment, starting and completion of MOOCs or online learning in general.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnline training formats and MOOCs have the potential to increase accessibility for training educators and address challenges reported by teachers in accessing relevant professional development.
“There is little doubt that online training formats and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in particular have the potential to increase accessibility for training educators and address some challenges reported by teachers in being able to access relevant professional development (OECD, 2019).”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
“There is little doubt that online training formats and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in particular have the potential to increase accessibility of training for teachers and address some of the challenges reported by teachers in being able to access relevant professional development (OECD, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OECD, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenLearners' participation in online courses could be potentially increased by improved instructional design and support mechanisms in online courses.
“Research findings acknowledge that learners' participation in online courses could be potentially increased by improved instructional design and support mechanisms in online courses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe face-to-face part of blended learning offers advanced interactive experiences that can better engage learners.
“Other researchers see the face-to-face part of blended learning as offering advanced interactive experiences that can better engage the learners (Mironov et al., 2014, p. 228).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mironov et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningResearch on general online courses offers an idea of the specific factors that are also likely to affect teachers.
“While the contexts, settings and populations explored by this research cannot be easily compared to the situation for teachers, it does offer an idea of the specific factors that are also likely to affect teachers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe school-based blended learning model may offer a bridge to online learning especially for teachers less prone to try out online courses on their own or lacking essential digital or other competences.
“The school-based blended learning model to be discussed in the next section may offer a bridge to online learning especially for teachers that are less prone to try out online courses on their own or may lack essential digital or other competences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThere are a few studies that examine the use of MOOCs for blended learning.
“There are also a few studies that examine the use of MOOCs for blended learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe messages may have also served as guidance, as they entailed concrete useful information.
“The messages may have also served as guidance, as they entailed concrete useful information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLeveraging predictive data analytics on factors like digital skills, self-regulated learning, previous experience has the potential to improve targeting and providing learners with personalized support.
“Leveraging predictive data analytics on such factors has the potential to improve targeting and providing learners with personalized support (Briggs and Spaulding, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Briggs and Spaulding, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThere are no studies that explore the specific combination of school-based blended learning model in the context of MOOCs.
“There are no studies that explore this specific combination of blended learning, but the literature does address the benefits of blended learning in teacher professional development (TPD) including when the onsite element of blended learning happens in school.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTeachers participating in MOOCs report challenges grouped into language barriers, technical issues, time pressures, workload, and issues linked to online collaboration with peers.
“For example, O'Shea and Bulceag report about challenges faced by teachers participating in MOOCs, which can be grouped into the following general categories: language barriers, technical issues, time pressures, workload and issues linked to online collaboration with peers (Majella & Bulceag, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Majella & Bulceag, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataFor some teachers, the messages may have acted as simple reminders to do certain things, such as to start the course.
“For some teachers, the messages may have acted as simple reminders to do certain things, such as to start the course.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenExtensive research exists looking at the factors that lead to completion of online courses.
“However, extensive research exists looking at the factors that lead to completion of online courses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenFor any support offered entirely online, an inherent limitation is that it may not reach teachers lacking basic digital competences.
“For any support offered entirely online, an inherent limitation is, that it may not reach teachers that lack basic digital competences to successfully navigate a course.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe effect of low expectations and lack of motivation on completion is likely due to the self-directed nature of online courses.
“This is likely due to the self-directed nature of online courses (Bawa, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bawa, 2016 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationBlended learning designs mean that professional development programs for teachers can be integrated into the local context of their school.
“Blended learning designs mean that professional development programs for teachers can be integrated into the local context in which teachers work, their school (Owston et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Owston et al., 2008 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIt is not possible to provide a conclusive answer to how the personalized support offer actually worked.
“It is not possible to provide a conclusive answer to how the personalized support offer actually worked.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere is a positive correlation between degree of action and interaction during online orientation courses and enrolment in university programs.
“They confirmed a positive correlation between the degree of action and interaction during online orientation courses and the enrolment in university programs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kai et al., 2017
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningFinding effective measures to support teachers in addressing challenges has the potential to increase overall participation of teachers in MOOCs.
“While there may be other reasons why overall teachers' participation in online training and MOOCs in particular remains below its potential, finding effective measures to support teachers in addressing these types of challenges surely has the potential to increase overall participation of teachers in MOOCs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExamples from post-secondary distance education may provide valuable lessons learned for online teacher training.
“In this section we look at some examples tested in post-secondary distance education settings, as we argue that they may provide valuable lessons learned for online teacher training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe findings offer two examples of promising mechanisms that can be implemented by course providers and schools to help more teachers benefit from the TPD opportunities offered by MOOCs.
“The findings in this paper offer two examples of promising mechanisms that can be implemented by course providers and schools to help more teachers benefit from the TPD opportunities offered by MOOCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataNo systematic evaluation of the participants of the study groups themselves was undertaken; the pilot teachers conducted reflection activities with study group participants during the last session.
“No systematic evaluation of the participants of the study groups themselves was undertaken but the pilot teachers conducted reflection activities with the study group participants during the last study group session.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThrough the trusted peer support they offer and their success in building participants' confidence and a learning community at school level, the study groups could drive interest and enrolment in MOOCs among teachers who might not normally have considered it.
“Through the trusted peer support such study groups offer as well as by the nature of their success in building confidence in the participants and a learning community at school level, the study groups could drive interest and enrolment in MOOCs of teachers who might not normally have considered it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLearning in an online or blended environment with familiar colleagues present was perceived to be of key importance to participating teachers and enabled different support mechanisms, including peer support.
“Furthermore, Philipsen et al.'s findings show that learning in an online or blended environment with familiar colleagues present, was perceived to be of key importance to the participating teachers and enabled different support mechanisms, including peer support (Philipsen et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Philipsen et al., 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIt is not clear to what extent the collaboration generated by the study groups was maintained for a longer period after the study groups ended.
“It is however not clear to what extent this type of collaboration was maintained for a longer period after the study groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe pilot findings support Philipsen et al. (2019)'s finding that working with known colleagues in online or blended courses was preferred by teachers and enabled different kinds of peer support.
“It also supports the finding of Philipsen et al. (2019) that working with known colleagues in online or blended courses was preferred by teachers and enabled different kinds of peer support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Philipsen et al. (2019) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe few studies that examine blended MOOCs in the context of TPD offer mixed results on their effectiveness.
“The few studies that examine blended MOOCs in the context of TPD offer mixed results on their effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe massiveness of MOOCs presents challenges for creating conditions necessary for learning because the educator cannot provide individual feedback to each learner.
“The massiveness of MOOCs presents challenges for creating the conditions necessary for learning insofar as the educator cannot provide individual feedback to each learner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIntegration into school could offer better opportunities for applying to practice what was learned and to develop school-based learning communities.
“This could offer better opportunities for applying to practice what was learned and to develop school-based learning communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe infrastructures required for the two mechanisms differ substantially: the personalized support offer requires a centralized technical infrastructure providing the data for personalization, while the school-based blended model requires a distributed and local network of collaborators in schools.
“The personalized support offer requires a centralized technical infrastructure that offers the data for the personalization to be possible, while the school-based blended model requires a distributed and local network of collaborators in schools.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMOOCs can be made more accessible to different teacher profiles, although this does not mean that MOOCs are a suitable TPD format for all teachers regardless of the support mechanisms on offer.
“While this does not mean that MOOCs -regardless of the support mechanisms on offer -are a suitable TPD format for all teachers, it does suggest that MOOCs can be made more accessible to different teacher profiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenResearch on blended MOOCs for TPD is gradually emerging.
“Research on blended MOOCs for TPD is gradually emerging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningA blended MOOC design has advantages of compensating for perceived weaknesses of the MOOC model.
“A blended MOOC design has the advantages of compensating for the perceived weaknesses of the MOOC model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe personalized support offer targets teachers who have already enrolled and coaxes them towards starting and completing a course through psychological effects and direct guidance, whereas the school-based blended learning model has a stronger potential to reach teachers who would never have considered enrolling in a MOOC.
“While the personalized support offer targets those teachers who have already made the first step of enrolling on a course and then coaxes them towards starting and completing a course through a mix of psychological effects and direct guidance, the school-based blended learning model has a stronger potential to reach those teachers who would never have considered enrolling to a MOOC in the first”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Gynter (2016), educators were in many cases unfamiliar with the MOOC concept and were therefore likely to reproduce what had been taught online rather than support students in more meaningful ways, which might explain the negative feedback of participants.
“Educators in the study were in many cases unfamiliar with the MOOC concept and were therefore likely to reproduce what had been taught online rather than support students in more meaningful ways, which might explain the negative feedback of participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gynter, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Teachers who have been skeptical about participating in online training formats and have shunned them are more likely to change their mind if they see others succeeding.
“Furthermore, teachers who have been skeptical about participating in online training formats at first glance and have therefore shunned them are more likely to change their mind if they see others succeeding.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Through participation in a school-based blended learning approach, teachers might feel more empowered to also participate in MOOC courses that do not offer such school-based infrastructure in the future.
“Through the participation in this blended learning approach, teachers might feel more empowered to also participate in MOOC courses that do not offer such schoolbased infrastructure in the future.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Little research is yet available that looks specifically at teachers, as opposed to factors affecting participation in online courses in general.
“While previous studies have identified factors that affect participation in online courses in general, little research is yet available looking at teachers specifically.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Teachers' communities that can offer support on an ongoing basis in a local context are an important component of impactful teacher professional development.
“Considering that the literature identifies teachers' communities which can offer support on an ongoing basis in a local context as an important component of impactful TPD.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Mironov study has conflicting publication years
MinorThe text cites Mironov et al. as a 2014 study, but the corresponding reference lists it as published in 2012.
“Mironov et al., 2014, p. 228”
“MIRONOV, C., BORZEA, A., & CIOLAN, L. (2012). Blended-learning -an effective tool for the professional development of higher education teachers.”
Cites
A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 · Cited by 3,807 · see citing works
Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587910500081269 · Cited by 1,219 · see citing works
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education
Li, Y., & Powell, S. (2013) · e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) · doi:10.13140/2.1.5072.8320 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
A review of online course dropout research: implications for practice and future research
Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y · Cited by 747 · see citing works
Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments
Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1701 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition
Jordan, K. (2015) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Retention in Online Courses: Exploring Issues and Solutions—A Literature Review
Bawa, P. (2016) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244015621777 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L. (2006) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
The Use of ICT in Education: a survey of schools in Europe
Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., et al. (2013) · doi:10.1111/ejed.12020 · Cited by 357
(1995) · eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Teaching Excellence through Professional Learning and Policy Reform: Lessons from around the World
Schleicher, A. (2016) · International Summit on the Teaching Profession · doi:10.1787/9789264252059-en · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Holder, B. A. (2007) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.002 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Understanding MOOC students: motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion
Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12131 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Scaling up behavioral science interventions in online education
Kizilcec, R. F., Reich, J., Yeomans, M., Dann, C., Brunskill, E., Lopez, G., Turkay, S., Williams, J. J., & Tingley, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921417117 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Pre-entry Variables Related to Retention in Online Distance Education
Dupin-Bryant, P. A. (2004) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1804_2 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Identifying at‐risk students in videoconferencing and web‐based distance education
Osborn, V. (2001) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923640109527073 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Blended teacher professional development: A synthesis of three program evaluations
Owston, R., Wideman, H., Murphy, J., & Lupshenyuk, D. (2008) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.07.003 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Machine learning approaches to predict learning outcomes in Massive open online courses
Al-Shabandar, R., Hussain, A. J., Laws, A., Keight, R., Lunn, J., & Radi, N. (2017) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2017.7965922 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
A Comparative Study of Dropout Rates and Causes for Two Different Distance Education Courses
Pierrakeas, C. J., Xeno, M., Panagiotakopoulos, C. T., & Vergidis, D. (2004) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.183 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Achieving Elusive Teacher Change through Challenging Myths about Learning: A Blended Approach
Anderson, R., Boaler, J., & Dieckmann, J. (2018) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci8030098 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
‘Just enough to make you take it seriously’: exploring students’ attitudes towards peer assessment
McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9570-z · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Persistence and the Adult Learner
Castles, J. (2004) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787404043813 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Preparing for Distance Learning: Designing an Online Student Orientation Course
Bozarth, J., Chapman, D. D., & LaMonica, L. (2004) · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Trust, T., & Horrocks, B. (2017) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1233507 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Castaño‐Muñoz, J., Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., & Punie, Y. (2018) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2018.1528997 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Improving Undergraduate Online Retention through Gated Advisement and Redundant Communication
Clay, M., Rowland, S., & Packard, A. L. (2008) · Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice · doi:10.2190/cs.10.1.g · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Incorporating Self and Peer Assessment in Reflective Teaching Practices.
Ratminingsih, N. M., Artini, L., & Padmadewi, N. (2017) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.12973/iji.2017.10410a · Cited by 64 · see citing works
An exploration of learner progress and drop‐out in Korea National Open University
Shin, N., & Kim, J. (1999) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/0158791990200107 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Planning prompts increase and forecast course completion in massive open online courses
Yeomans, M., & Reich, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference · doi:10.1145/3027385.3027416 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Voogt, J. M., Almekinders, M. P., van den Akker, J., & Moonen, B. H. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.003 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Connections Matter: How Interactive Peers Affect Students in Online College Courses
Bettinger, E., Liu, J., & Loeb, S. (2016) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.21932 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Gynther, K. (2016) · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning · Cited by 51 · see citing works
The Effects of Hands-On Experience On Students' Preferences for Assessment Methods
Struyven, K., Dochy, F. J. R. C., & Janssens, S. (2008) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487107311335 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Online learning community development with teachers as a means of enhancing initial teacher training
Hramiak, A. (2010) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/14759390903579265 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Catie: A Blended Approach to Situated Professional Development
Holmes, A., Polhemus, L., & Jennings, S. (2005) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/f97w-quj4-g7yg-fpxc · Cited by 29 · see citing works
(2017) · Educational Data Mining · Cited by 22 · see citing works
King, M., Luan, B., & Lopes, E. (2018) · Open Praxis · doi:10.5944/openpraxis.10.3.840 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Kennedy, E., Moghli, M., Chase, E. S., et al. (2019) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Hoffmann-Dumieński, K. (2016) · Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning · doi:10.61468/jofdl.v20i2.278 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
BLENDED-LEARNING - AN EFFECTIVE TOOL FOR THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION TEACHERS
Mironov, C., popovici, A. B., & Ciolan, L. I. (2012) · eLearning and Software for Education · doi:10.12753/2066-026x-12-036 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Survey of Schools: ICT in Education
Schoolnet, E., & University of Liege Psychology and Education (2013) · DSpace repository (University of Tartu) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- O'SHEA, M., & BULCEAG, I. (2020). The impact of participation in Teacher Academy online courses on the practice and identity of teachers: a research study. https://www.schooleducationgateway.eu/downloads/webinars/PAB%20Online %20Event/Teacher%20Academy_Research%20Report_2020_Final.pdf OECD (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I). OECD (2021). The State of School Education -One Year into the COVID Pandemic (Issue March). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/the-state-of- school-education_201dde84-en?_ga=2.239989002.809511923.1621141738- 1025739882.1621141738
- ÖZKAN, Y., & KURTULDU, E. PRE-SERVICE LANGUAGE TEACHERS'REFLECTIONS ON PEER ASSESSMENT IN MICRO TEACHING SESSIONS OF A METHODOLOGY COURSE. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(4), 276-284.
- PURSEL, B. K., ZHANG, L., JABLOKOW, K. W., CHOI, G. W., & VELEGOL, D. (2016b). Understanding MOOC students: Motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12131 · DOI
- YUKSELTURK, E., & BULUT, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Educational Technology and Society, 10(2), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.10.2.71 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pinweha, S. (2025) · PASAA · doi:10.58837/chula.pasaa.70.6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hertz, B., & Engelhardt, K.
- Affiliations
- European Schoolnet
- ORCID
- Katja Engelhardt
- Venue
- IUL Research
- Publisher
- IUL Research
- Published
- 2021-07-17
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2723-9586 (ISSN-L)
- 2724-3915
- OpenAlex
- W4289539632
- Semantic Scholar
- e83550cd70ad8a1825fce5218d06f799c12b2c11
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- IUL Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- MOOCs, teacher participation, individualized support, teacher professional development, online teacher training, blended learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-12.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review