Authenticity, relevance, and connectedness: Graduate students' learning preferences and experiences in an online reading education course
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authentic and practical activities and relevant commenting fostered participation and commitment to the task.
“authentic and practical activities (Satar and Akcan 2018;Swaggerty and Broemmel 2017;Yeh 2010) as well as relevant commenting (Tang and Lam 2014;Vinagre 2017) fostered participation and commitment to the task.”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Swaggerty and Broemmel 2017
Cites
Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6 · Cited by 6,619 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 · Cited by 1,019 · see citing works
A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
- Authors
- Swaggerty, E. A., & Broemmel, A. D.
- Affiliations
- East Carolina University (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Swaggerty, Elizabeth A.
- Venue
- The Internet and Higher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 80-86
- ISSN
- 1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2534431861
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Internet and Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- online learning, graduate students, reading instruction, learning styles, teacher action research, social learning, online learning communities, synchronous and asynchronous interaction, course effectiveness, online course design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
