Cited by 16Surgical Sutures and AdhesivesPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Metal-crosslinked ɛ-poly-L-lysine tissue adhesives with high adhesive performance: Inspiration from mussel adhesive environment

Li, Sidi, Chen, Ning, Li, Yang, Li, Xueping, Zhan, Qi, Ban, Jiamin, Zhao, Jin, Hou, Xin +1 more·2020·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Abstract

Strong glue of mussels has long been considered as an ideal model to design synthetic bio-adhesives but the adhesive strength of metal-crosslinked mussel-inspired glues is not often satisfactory. Herein, inspired by the adhesive environment of mussels, we obtained metal-crosslinked ε-poly-L-lysine adhesives with high adhesive performance by introducing the elements of suitable adhesive environment (SAE) into the adhesives. The elements of SAE were clarified as weak alkaline conditions (pH ∼ 7.4) and low Fe 3+ contents. The adhesive strength (∼105 kPa) of the metal-crosslinked adhesives endowed with the elements of SAE (PL-Cat/Fe-SAE) was about 8 times higher than that of fibrin glues. The high adhesive strength was found to originate from distinctive interfacial adhesion and cohesion strength of PL-Cat/Fe-SAE. PL-Cat/Fe-SAE showed strong interfacial adhesion capacity and nearly comparable cohesion strength to those PL-Cat/Fe adhesives with higher Fe 3+ contents. The nearly comparable cohesion strength of PL-Cat/Fe-SAE was then found to be due to more amount of stable tris-complex existed in PL-Cat/Fe-SAE. In addition, PL-Cat/Fe-SAE was able to efficiently close the full thickness skin incisions. The study highlighted the importance of introducing SAE elements into the design of tissue adhesives and provided a facile and efficient strategy for constructing tissue adhesives with high adhesive performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.257

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Li and coworkers developed a Fe3+-crosslinked catechol-modified ε-polylysine adhesive hydrogel; by rationally tuning the pH and Fe3+ content in the gelation condition, the resultant adhesive hydrogels exhibited high adhesive strength.

    “For example, Li and coworkers developed a Fe3+-crosslinked catechol-modified ε-polylysine adhesive hydrogel. By rationally tuning the pH and Fe3+ content in the gelation condition, the resultant adhesive hydrogels exhibited high adhesive strength [65].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, S., Chen, N., Li, Y., Li, X., Zhan, Q., Ban, J., Zhao, J., Hou, X., & Yuan, X.
Affiliations
Tianjin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Jin
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
153
Pages
1251-1261
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991217264
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51103095, 51673144)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
ε-poly-L-lysine, tissue adhesives, mussel-inspired adhesives, adhesion strength, tris-complexes, interfacial adhesion, cohesive strength, skin closure
MeSH terms
Adhesiveness, Animals, Iron, Polylysine, Rheology, Tissue Adhesives, Biomimetics, NIH 3T3 Cells, Bivalvia, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review