The DOI matches its Crossref record; 203 of the 208 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microalgae starch: A promising raw material for the bioethanol production
Abstract
Ethanol is currently the most successful biofuel and can be produced from microalgal biomass (third-generation). Ethanol from microalgal biomass has advantages because it does not use arable land and reduces environmental impacts through the sequestration of CO 2 from the atmosphere. In this way, micro and macroalgal starch, which is structurally similar to that from higher plants can be considered a promise raw material for the production of bioethanol. Thus, strategies can be used to intensify the carbohydrate concentration in the microalgal biomass enabling the production of third-generation bioethanol. The microalgae biomass can be destined to biorefineries so that the residual biomass generated from the extraction processes is used for the production of high value-added products. Therefore, the process will have an impact on reducing the production costs and the generation of waste. In this context, this review aims to bring concepts and perspectives on the production of third-generation bioethanol, demonstrating the microalgal biomass potential as a carbon source to produce bioethanol and supply part of the world energy demand. The main factors that influence the microalgal cultivation and fermentation process, as well as the processes of transformation of biomass into the easily fermentable substrate are also discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The high cost of producing biofuels and bioenergy from microalgae still poses a barrier in the efficient development of this sector [151,172,174,176].”
From Emerging Applications of Chlorella sp. and Spirulina (Arthrospira) sp. (2023) · cites this paper as [174]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Items 201–203 of 203
Fukuda, A., Kuriya, Y., Konishi, J., Mutaguchi, K., Uemura, T., Miura, D., & Okamoto, M. (2018) · Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering · doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.10.020 · Cited by 9
Pinnola, A., Formighieri, C., & Bassi, R. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_436-3 · Cited by 7
Patel, P., Patel, S., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2016) · Cited by 4
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 208 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Kalia, 2017, vol. 1
- Freitas, 2019, Novel foods: a meal replacement shake and a high-calorie food supplemented with Spirulina biomass, Int. Food Res. J., 26, 59
- Mardiah, 2017, Growth optimization of microalgae Chlorella vulgaris to increase glucose content for bioethanol feedstock, Res J Pharm Biol. Chem. Sci, 8, 293
- Margarites, 2014, Increment of carbohydrate concentration of Chlorella minutissima microalgae for bioethanol production, Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., 4, 80
- Chandel, 2011, Bioconversion of pentose sugars into ethanol: a review and future directions, Biotechnol, Mol. Biol. Rev., 6, 8
- Martin, 2013, Optimal engineered algae composition for the integrated simultaneous production of bioethanol and biodiesel, AICHE J., 59, 2872, 10.1002/aic.14071 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Daneshvar, E., Wicker, R. J., Show, P.-L., & Bhatnagar, A. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.130884 · Cited by 501
Algal Biomass Valorization for Biofuel Production and Carbon Sequestration: A Review
Sarwer, A., Hamed, S. M., Osman, A. I., Jamil, F., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., Alhajeri, N. S., & Rooney, D. W. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01458-1 · Cited by 380
Zhao, K., Jia, C., Li, Z., Du, X., Wang, Y., Li, J., Yao, Z., & Yao, J. (2023) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128913 · Cited by 221
Microalgae-based carbohydrates: A green innovative source of bioenergy
Silvello, M. A. D. C., Gonçalves, Í. S., Azambuja, S. P. H., Costa, S. S., Silva, P. G. P., Santos, L. O., & Goldbeck, R. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126304 · Cited by 196
Prasad, B. R., Padhi, R. K., & Ghosh, G. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-022-04252-2 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Maia, J. L. D., Cardoso, J. S., Mastrantonio, D. J. D. S., Bierhals, C. K., Moreira, J. B., Costa, J. A. V., & Morais, M. G. D.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Morais, Michele Greque de
- Venue
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- Pt B
- Pages
- 2739-2749
- ISSN
- 0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093703411
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 208
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Keywords
- third-generation bioethanol, microalgal biomass, biofuels, carbohydrate concentration, biorefinery, fermentation, microalgae cultivation, CO2 sequestration, biomass pretreatment
- MeSH terms
- Ethanol, Carbon, Fermentation, Starch, Biomass, Biofuels, Bioengineering, Microalgae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review