Cited by 0SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchEvolution and Genetic DynamicsSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mutational and evolutionary dynamics of non-structural and spike proteins from variants of concern (VOC) of SARS-CoV-2 in India

Open access
Chaudhuri, Ankur, Das, Subhrangshu, Chakrabarti, Saikat·2024·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Monitoring the genetic diversity and emerging mutations in SARS-CoV-2 remains crucial for understanding its evolution, given the virus's persistence in India. This study analyzes lineage dynamics, mutation screening, structural analysis, and phylodynamics of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) in India from October 2020 to September 2023. The predominant variants identified were alpha, beta, delta, and omicron, with delta and omicron making up 76.05 % of sequenced genomes. The B.1.617.2 lineage of the delta variant was the major contributor to COVID-19 cases before the rise of omicron. Mutation screening of non-structural proteins (NSPs) and spike proteins revealed distinct profiles for each VOC. Co-mutation patterns were analyzed, showing structural and energetic alterations. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that nsp1, nsp3, nsp4, nsp13, and nsp14 were strongly associated with increased mutation load. The study also highlighted that nsp14 and spike have similar mutability patterns, underscoring nsp14's critical role in SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and persistence. This research provides a comprehensive view of SARS-CoV-2's evolution and persistence in India.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137154

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Gorbalenya, 2020, The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2, nature, Microbiology, 5, 536
  2. Arya, 2021, Structural insights into SARS-CoV-2 proteins, J. Mol. Biol., 433, 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.11.024 · DOI
  3. R. Gorkhali, P. Koirala, S. Rijal, A. Mainali, A. Baral, H.K. Bhattarai, Structure and function of major SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV proteins, Bioinformatics and Biology Insights. 15 (2021) 117793222110258.doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/11779322211025876. · DOI
  4. Poonam, 2021, Coronavirus: history, Genome Structure and Pathogenesis, Coronaviruses., 2, 325
  5. Yadav, 2021, Role of structural and non-structural proteins and therapeutic targets of SARS-CoV-2 for COVID-19, Cells, 10, 821, 10.3390/cells10040821 · DOI
  6. Satarker, 2020, Structural proteins in severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2, Arch. Med. Res., 51, 482, 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.05.012 · DOI
  7. Volz, 2021, Assessing transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England, Nature, 593, 266, 10.1038/s41586-021-03470-x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Tegally, 2021, Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa, Nature, 592, 438, 10.1038/s41586-021-03402-9 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Faria, 2021, Genomics and epidemiology of the P.1 SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus, Brazil, Science, 372, 815, 10.1126/science.abh2644 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Maheshwari, 2023, A comprehensive review on COVID-19 variant: Delta plus and omicron variant, International Journal of Pharma Professional’s Research (IJPPR)., 14, 55, 10.48165/ijppronline.2023.14205 · DOI
  11. Burki, 2022, Omicron variant and booster COVID-19 vaccines, Lancet Respir. Med., 10, 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00361-7 · DOI
  12. Saxena, 2022, Characterization of the novel SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of concern and its global perspective, J. Med. Virol., 94, 1738, 10.1002/jmv.27524 · DOI
  13. Sheward, 2023, Sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 variant to prevailing neutralising antibody responses, Lancet Infect. Dis., 23, e462, 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00588-1 · DOI
  14. Uriu, 2023, Transmissibility, infectivity, and immune evasion of the SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 variant, Lancet Infect. Dis., 23, e460, 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00575-3 · DOI
  15. J.N. Faraone, P. Qu, N. Goodarzi, Y.-M. Zheng, C. Carlin, L.J. Saif, E.M. Oltz, K. Xu, D. Jones, R.J. Gumina, S.-L. Liu, Immune evasion and membrane fusion of SARS-CoV-2 XBB subvariants EG.5.1 and XBB.2.3, Emerging Microbes & Infections.12 (2023).doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2270069. · DOI
  16. John, 2023, XBB.1.16 omicron subvariant rise to a variant of interest: implications for global alertness and preparedness, Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences., 18, 1285, 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.05.013 · DOI
  17. Lei, 2018, Nsp3 of coronaviruses: structures and functions of a large multi-domain protein, Antivir. Res., 149, 58, 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.11.001 · DOI
  18. Lavigne, 2021, SARS-CoV-2 Nsp3 unique domain SUD interacts with guanine quadruplexes and G4-ligands inhibit this interaction, Nucleic Acids Res., 49, 7695, 10.1093/nar/gkab571 · DOI
  19. Chen, 2021, Overview of antiviral drug candidates targeting coronaviral 3C-like main proteases, FEBS J., 288, 5089, 10.1111/febs.15696 · DOI
  20. Kirchdoerfer, 2019, Structure of the SARS-CoV nsp12 polymerase bound to nsp7 and nsp8 co-factors, Nat. Commun., 10, 10.1038/s41467-019-10280-3 · DOI
  21. Wang, 2020, Structural basis for RNA replication by the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase, Cell, 182, 417, 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.034 · DOI
  22. Tanner, 2003, The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus NTPase/helicase belongs to a distinct class of 5′ to 3′ viral helicases, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 39578, 10.1074/jbc.C300328200 · DOI
  23. Lee, 2010, Cooperative translocation enhances the unwinding of duplex DNA by SARS coronavirus helicase nsP13, Nucleic Acids Res., 38, 7626, 10.1093/nar/gkq647 · DOI
  24. Yuan, 2020, Nonstructural protein 1 of SARS-CoV-2 is a potent pathogenicity factor redirecting host protein synthesis machinery toward viral RNA, Mol. Cell, 80, 1055, 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.034 · DOI
  25. Ma, 2021, Structure and function of N-terminal zinc finger domain of SARS-CoV-2 NSP2, VirologicaSinica, 36, 1104
  26. Q. Zhong, Faculty Opinions recommendation of Mammalian hybrid pre-autophagosomal structure HyPAS generates autophagosomes., Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature. (2021). doi:https://doi.org/10.3410/f.741116278.793589974. · DOI
  27. Laiton-Donato, 2021, Characterization of the emerging B.1.621 variant of interest of SARS-CoV-2, Infect. Genet. Evol., 95, 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105038 · DOI
  28. Saito, 2021, Enhanced fusogenicity and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Delta P681R mutation, Nature, 602, 300, 10.1038/s41586-021-04266-9 · DOI
  29. Zhang, 2021, Furin cleavage of the SARS-CoV-2 spike is modulated by O-glycosylation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 118, 10.1073/pnas.2109905118 · DOI
  30. Sanda, 2021, N- and O-glycosylation of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, Anal. Chem., 93, 2003, 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03173 · DOI
  31. Edgar, 2004, MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 1792, 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kumar, 2018, MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms, Mol. Biol. Evol., 35, 1547, 10.1093/molbev/msy096 · DOI
  33. Backeljau, 1996, Multiple UPGMA and neighbor-joining trees and the performance of some computer packages, Mol. Biol. Evol., 13, 309, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025590 · DOI
  34. Robinson, 2016, Phylo.io: interactive viewing and comparison of large phylogenetic trees on the web, Mol. Biol. Evol., 33, 2163, 10.1093/molbev/msw080 · DOI
  35. Goluch, 2020, VisualTreeCmp: comprehensive comparison of phylogenetic trees on the web, Methods Ecol. Evol., 11, 494, 10.1111/2041-210X.13358 · DOI
  36. Letunic, 2016, Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees, Nucleic Acids Res., 44, W242, 10.1093/nar/gkw290 · DOI
  37. Saito, 2012, A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins, Nat. Methods, 9, 1069, 10.1038/nmeth.2212 · DOI
  38. J.L. Sussman, D. Lin, J. Jiang, N.O. Manning, J. Prilusky, O. Ritter, E.E. Abola, Protein data Bank (PDB): database of three-dimensional structural information of biological macromolecules, ActaCrystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography. 54 (1998) 1078–1084. doi:https://doi.org/10.1107/s0907444998009378. · DOI
  39. Eswar, 2008, Protein structure modeling with MODELLER, 145, 10.1007/978-1-60327-058-8_8 · DOI
  40. Shen, 2006, Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures, Protein Sci., 15, 2507, 10.1110/ps.062416606 · DOI
  41. Holm, 2022, Dali server: structural unification of protein families, Nucleic Acids Res., 50, W210, 10.1093/nar/gkac387 · DOI
  42. Van Der Spoel, 2005, GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free, J. Comput. Chem., 26, 1701, 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI
  43. Wang, 2004, Development and testing of a general amber force field, J. Comput. Chem., 25, 1157, 10.1002/jcc.20035 · DOI
  44. Mark, 2001, Structure and dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E water models at 298 K, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 9954, 10.1021/jp003020w · DOI
  45. Makov, 1995, Periodic boundary conditions in ab initio calculations, Phys. Rev. B, 51, 4014, 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.4014 · DOI
  46. Meza, 2010, Steepest descent, WIREs, Comput. Stat., 2, 719
  47. Lemak, 1994, On TheBerendsen thermostat, Mol. Simul., 13, 177, 10.1080/08927029408021981 · DOI
  48. Martoňák, 2003, Predicting crystal structures: the Parrinello-Rahman method revisited, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.075503 · DOI
  49. Petersen, 1995, Accuracy and efficiency of the particle mesh Ewald method, J. Chem. Phys., 103, 3668, 10.1063/1.470043 · DOI
  50. Hess, 1997, LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations, J. Comput. Chem., 18, 1463, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  51. Humphrey, 1996, VMD: Visual molecular dynamics, J. Mol. Graph., 14, 33, 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Pettersen, 2004, UCSF chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis, J. Comput. Chem., 25, 1605, 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  53. DeLano, 2002, Pymol: an open-source molecular graphics tool, CCP4 Newsl.Protein Crystallogr., 40, 82
  54. Kabsch, 1983, Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features, Biopolymers, 22, 2577, 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Abdi, 2010, Principal component analysis, WIREs, Comput. Stat., 2, 433
  56. Egloff, 2004, The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus replicative protein nsp9 is a single-stranded RNA-binding subunit unique in the RNA virus world, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 101, 3792, 10.1073/pnas.0307877101 · DOI
  57. Biswas, 2021, Genomic surveillance and Phylodynamic analyses reveal the emergence of novel mutations and co-mutation patterns within SARS-CoV-2 variants prevalent in India, Front. Microbiol., 12, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.703933 · DOI
  58. Kannan, 2020, Infectivity of SARS-CoV-2: there is something more than D614G?, J. NeuroImmune Pharmacol., 15, 574, 10.1007/s11481-020-09954-3 · DOI
  59. Pachetti, 2020, Emerging SARS-CoV-2 mutation hot spots include a novel RNA-dependent-RNA polymerase variant, J. Transl. Med., 18, 10.1186/s12967-020-02344-6 · DOI
  60. Biswas, 2021, Structural and drug screening analysis of the non-structural proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus extracted from Indian coronavirus disease 2019 patients, Front. Genet., 12, 10.3389/fgene.2021.626642 · DOI
  61. Goldswain, 2023, The P323L substitution in the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase (NSP12) confers a selective advantage during infection, Genome Biol., 24, 10.1186/s13059-023-02881-5 · DOI
  62. Kim, 2023, SARS-CoV-2 variants with NSP12 P323L/G671S mutations display enhanced virus replication in ferret upper airways and higher transmissibility, Cell Rep., 42, 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113077 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chaudhuri, A., Das, S., & Chakrabarti, S.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Chaudhuri, Ankur
  • Chakrabarti, Saikat
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
282
Issue
Pt 4
Pages
137154
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403966378
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (BT/PR40137/BTIS/137/35/2022)
  • CSIR - Indian Institute of Chemical Biology
  • Indian Council of Medical Research (BMI/11(55)2022)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, variants of concern, non-structural proteins, spike protein, viral mutations, co-mutation patterns, nsp14, phylodynamics, Omicron variant, Delta variant, India, viral evolution
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, India, Mutation, Phylogeny, Genome, Viral, Viral Nonstructural Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review