CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 237Vascular Procedures and ComplicationsCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity

Yoo, Byung-Su, Yoon, Junghan, Ko, Ji-Yean, Kim, Jang-Young, Lee, Seung-Hwan, Hwang, Sung-Oh, Choe, Kyung-Hoon·2005·International Journal of Cardiology
DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.061
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background The radial artery is currently regarded as a useful vascular access site for coronary procedures. Adequate anatomical information of the radial artery should be helpful in performing the transradial coronary procedure. Therefore, we tried to evaluate the size of radial artery, the incidence and clinical significance of anomalous branching patterns and tortuosity of the radial artery related with transradial coronary procedure.Materials and method In 1191 cases, mean radial arterial diameter (RAD) was measured before and after the procedure using a two-dimensional ultrasound and retrograde radial artery angiography was performed before the transradial coronary procedure in all patients. Branching anomaly, tortuosity of the radial artery and procedural characteristics including procedure times and local vascular complications were analyzed.Results The mean RAD was 2.60 +/- 0.41 mm by two-dimensional ultrasound: 2.69 +/- 0.40 mm in men and 2.43 +/- 0.38 mm in women (p < 0.001). Radial artery occlusion occurred in 0.6% in coronary angiography and 1.4% in coronary intervention. In multivariate analysis, coronary intervention was significantly related to the radial artery occlusion (p = 0.048). Anomalous branching of upper extremity artery was found in 38 cases (3.2%); high origin of the radial artery was most frequent in 28 cases (2.4%). Tortuosity of radial and brachial artery was found in 67 of 50 cases (4.2%). Most common forms of tortuosity were S-shape in 21 cases (31.3%) and Omega-shape in 21 cases (31.3%). And most common site of radial artery tortuosity was proximal third of antecubital fossa (35 cases, 52.2%). Prolonged procedure times and cross-overs to other arteries were related with tortuosity of the radial artery, but not with anomalous branching.Conclusion In our study, radial artery diameter was larger than the outer diameter of 5Fr sheath in 82.7% for transradial coronary procedure. Radial artery occlusion was associated with coronary intervention using larger size sheath than diagnostic angiography using 5Fr sheath. The incidence in branching anomaly and tortuosity of radial artery was not rare in our study. Radial artery tortuosity was associated with old age and prolonged procedure time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.061

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

2 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–236 of 236

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Yoo, B.-S., Yoon, J., Ko, J.-Y., Kim, J.-Y., Lee, S.-H., Hwang, S.-O., & Choe, K.-H.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
421-427
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.061
OpenAlex
W2065778099
Cited by
237
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Keywords
radial artery, transradial access, coronary intervention, coronary angiography, arterial diameter, radial artery occlusion, vascular complications, antecubital fossa, procedure time, sex differences
MeSH terms
Catheterization, Peripheral, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of Results, Coronary Angiography, Myocardial Ischemia, Radial Artery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review