Factors influencing mortality in atrial fibrillation. Post hoc analysis of an observational study in outpatients
Abstract
Background Whether patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have an increased mortality compared with the general population is controversially assessed.Methods The mortality of 409 outpatients with AF (36% female, mean age 62 years, 39% paroxysmal AF, 27% lone AF), who were included in a prospective observational study, was compared with the mortality of the general population.Results The mortality was 4%/year and constant during the 10 years of follow-up. Age (p<0.0001), heart failure (p=0.0013) and echocardiographically detected reduced left ventricular systolic function (p=0.0353) were independent predictors. The mortality of AF patients was 1.4-fold higher than in the general population, of female 1.5 and of male 1.3. Patients with permanent AF had a 1.5-fold higher and patients with heart failure a 1.7-fold higher mortality than the general population. Patients with lone AF did not differ in the mortality from the general population. The mortality of AF patients was not influenced by the duration of atrial fibrillation.Conclusion The prognosis of AF patients is dependent on the cardiovascular co-morbidity, especially the presence or absence of heart failure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women have a longer QTc interval than men.
“Animal models are consistent with electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings from healthy individuals demonstrating that women have a longer QTc interval than men.158”
From Atrial fibrillation in women: epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and prognosis (2016) · cites this paper as [158]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Stöllberger, C., Winkler-Dworak, M., Finsterer, J., Hartl, E., & Chnupa, P.
- Affiliations
- Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung der Stadt Wien (AT)
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (SK)
- Corresponding author
- Stöllberger, Claudia
- Venue
- International Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 140-144
- ISSN
- 0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163176054
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, mortality, heart failure, left ventricular systolic function, lone atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, permanent atrial fibrillation, age, cardiovascular comorbidity, prognosis, outpatients
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Atrial Fibrillation, Austria, Echocardiography, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review