Cited by 43Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersVestibular and auditory disordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Short-term evolution of vasovagal syncope: Influence on the quality of life

Barón-Esquivias, Gonzalo, Gómez, Silvia, Aguilera, Almudena, Campos, Ana, Romero, Nieves, Cayuela, Aurelio, Valle, Juan I., Redondo, Mercedes +4 more·2005·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

To evaluate the short-term evolution and changes in the quality of life (QoL) of patients suffering from vasovagal syncope (VVS) by the application of the Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) that was prospectively administrated to all consecutive patients with syncope and abnormal response to head-up tilt test. We included 167 patients (55.7% women, median age 42 years old). During a 6-month follow-up, recurrence was observed in 33 patients (19.8%). The mean recurrence-free time was 6.2+/-0.34 months. Among those patients with and without relapses, there were only differences in the previous number of syncopes (6 vs. 3, p=0.0051). Of them, 19 (11%) only presented 1 syncopal relapse and 14 (8.2%) presented more than 1. There were differences in the time until the first relapse [4 months (2.3-5.4) vs. 1.6 months (0.8-3.3), p=0.002] and an inverse correlation between the time until the appearance of recurrences and their number (r2 Spearman=-0.54, p=0.002). In just 6 months, those patients who had recurrence had a worse QoL than those who did not, in 7 dimensions of the SF-36 questionnaire. In the short-term, one in every five patients with VVS had at least 1 relapse, and if it is very early, it can recur in up to 8% of them. The QoL of these patients is correlated with the appearance of relapses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.10.019

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barón-Esquivias, G., Gómez, S., Aguilera, A., Campos, A., Romero, N., Cayuela, A., Valle, J. I., Redondo, M., Pedrote, A., Burgos, J., Martínez, Á., & Errázquin, F.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
315-319
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031335970
Cited by
43
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
vasovagal syncope, quality of life, syncope recurrence, short-term follow-up, head-up tilt, SF-36, time to recurrence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Posture, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Incidence, Disease-Free Survival, Syncope, Vasovagal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review