Cited by 96Cardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Inadequate consultation behavior modulates the relationship between Type D personality and impaired health status in chronic heart failure

Pelle, Aline J., Schiffer, Angélique A., Smith, Otto R., Widdershoven, Jos W., Denollet, Johan·2010·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Psychological risk factors for impaired health outcomes have been acknowledged in chronic heart failure (CHF), with Type D personality being such a risk factor. Inadequate consultation behavior, a specific aspect of self-management, might be one mechanism in explaining the adverse effect of Type D on health outcomes. In this study we examined the relationship between Type D personality, impaired disease-specific health status, and inadequate consultation behavior.Methods and results CHF outpatients (n=313) completed the Type D Scale (DS14) at baseline, and the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale (EHFScBS) and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) at 6-month follow-up. Type D personality independently predicted inadequate consultation behavior (OR=1.80, 95%CI [1.03-3.16], p=.04) and impaired health status (OR=3.61, 95%CI [1.93-6.74], p<.001) at 6-month follow-up, adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. Inadequate consultation behavior (OR=1.80, 95%CI [1.11-2.94], p=.02) and NYHA-class (OR=2.83, 95%CI [1.17-4.71], p<.001) were associated with impaired health status, after controlling for demographics, clinical variables, and Type D personality. Post-hoc multivariable analysis pointed out that Type D patients who displayed inadequate consultation behavior were at a 6-fold increased risk of reporting impaired health status, compared to the reference group of non-Type D patients who displayed adequate consultation behavior (OR=6.06, 95%CI [2.53-14.52], p<.001).Conclusions These findings provide evidence for inadequate behavior as a mechanism that may explain the link between Type D personality and impaired health status. Future studies are warranted to elaborate on these findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.12.086

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 96

Authors
Pelle, A. J., Schiffer, A. A., Smith, O. R., Widdershoven, J. W., & Denollet, J.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL)
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
142
Issue
1
Pages
65-71
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964658073
Cited by
96
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
Type D personality, chronic heart failure, health status, heart failure self-management, psychological risk factors, NYHA functional class
MeSH terms
Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Inventory, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Behavior Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review